Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I currently have a stock R33 S2. So stock suspension and 16 alloys. I plan to get some 18" with 235/18/40 rubber. Now this will make my car, as is, look quite high and silly, correct?

So i will need to do some adjustments with suspension? What are my options? Now please remember, i am not interested in racing, i doubt i will ever take my car to a track, its an everyday normal car but fun and for my to enjoy. I frequent quite bumpy roads, so i do NOT want my car to be really firm and stiff like alot of people's. I do want decent handling but dont want to feel every bump so my dash rattles and my arse bruises. This is important. I want a relatively smooth ride.

And i dont want to spend alot of money.

One option i am aware of is just getting some Tomei progressive springs ($500 fitted) and dropping the car say an inch or so. But yeah how the car handles bumps is my biggest concern.

What can i do?

Edited by Xizor
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/122181-smooth-ride-with-18s-possible/
Share on other sites

I'm afraid not much, the lower the profile the more of the bumps you can feel, and to makes things more bumpy lowering it on aftermarket springs which are always stiffer than factory.

If your after comfort, stock wheels, stock springs, new shocks are the way to go.

Its not impossible, but its going to be very difficult. Which means it will cost a fair amount.

So you're going to have to choose when it comes to the cost / benefit ratio, which side you're going to err on if you can't have them both.

Unfortunately most people will take the supposed handling benefits of ultra-stiff suspension or the look of lowered springs over comfort, so there's very little advice from other owners that have achieved what you're after.

Progressive springs are a good start, but you'll need to find shocks that match. Its not impossible, but since no-one else we know of has done it you'll have to figure it out yourself. Which means trial-and-error with various combos until you find something good. Hence the cost, unless you settle for something that's merely OK.....

If Bilstein or Eibach offer something for the R33 they'd be a good start. The Europeans understand the fact that ultra-stiff suspension does not a good handling road car make.

Just been out to a few tyre and rim places... there isnt really jack shit in 17's out there. They are all narrow rims except for 2 sets of Lenso's i didnt mind, but that was it. And to be honest i didnt like them THAT much because they were polished metal/silver or something... looked pretty average compared to shadow chrome. Oh well, might have to just get 18's after all!!!

What he wants;

1. 18" wheels, that means low profile tyres

2. Slightly lower ride height

3. Good ride comfort

4. Not overly concerned with handling

My advice via PM was....... the most effective way to lower it, retain acceptable ride comfort and achieve superior handling is by changing the shocks. The Bilsteins in the Group Buy come with additional circlip grooves which enable you to lower it using the standard springs. Around 24 mm lowering (from standard) works very well, and is the most I would suggest.

I post this up for the benefit of others in similar situations.

:P cheers ;)

Just been out to a few tyre and rim places... there isnt really jack shit in 17's out there. They are all narrow rims except for 2 sets of Lenso's i didnt mind, but that was it. And to be honest i didnt like them THAT much because they were polished metal/silver or something... looked pretty average compared to shadow chrome. Oh well, might have to just get 18's after all!!!

Do some shopping on the web the range of 17" rims is far greater than 18's. What you see in tyre shops is what the manager likes, not necessarily what you like.

:P cheers ;)

Been around to stores and online, almost everything in 17" are only 7-7.5 wide... i want wider. Find the odd 8 wide rim but not found any i like. Only ones that i have are expensive import rims which are definitely way outside the budget. Will contemplate finances and whether i can plunge into 18's that i like and new shocks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...