Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This thread has definately brought out some good reading.

Back to the Lean Out issue.

Because No. 6 cylinder is so far from the cooling system pump, We have fitted some extra plumbing into the cooling system to remove the steam out of the engine. Has enybody done the same to thier RB engine?

:thumbsup:

Yes

Guys; sharing is good :D can you post some pics please and a description of what you did? I've long held an interest in cooling systems and elimination of temp differential in blocks - this is an often overlooked area because it's not 'visible'. If only the horrors of some cooling systems were more widely known...interestingly I see the previous edition of HPI has a Jun 2.7 on the cover built by CRD that has a 3 take off points for the cooling system in the head. Now that's what Im talking about. Some say it's only good for big kw engines but I'm not convinced, I experimented with a simple de aeration tank and some other minor mods on a 440 ci Chrysler and the difference was amazing.

Regards

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have got a pic of the setup on our engine that I'll post shortly.

I guess its all about balance and with the goal in mind being the ideal charge air temp ACROSS all cylinders.

If you have No.1 cylinder head temp is running cooler than No.6 cylinder head temp, it must have an effect on the density/velocity of the air that travells across the chamber.

It's my way of thinking that you should have your charge air temp TO the cylinders at the same temp as the water that exits the cylinder head, about 60 - 80*C. May sound strange to some but the air changes its speed with temperature changes. Also at this temp the air is still reasonably dense, if you go below 60 it moves too slow, if you go above it looses density.

In a low HP engine it's not a real problem but for an engine developing 300 od HP per litre, if its not right you loose an engine.

Doing this also reduces the stress of developing horsepower, the engine is more relaxed or more dynamically balanced.

Anyway enough crap from me.

Later.

Last time I posted these pics it was greeted with a touch of cynicism.. perhaps in the context of this discussion it will make more sense to people now..

I've seen that style of setup on many many RB motors of good power.

Thats half way there that is what the japs refere to as the gt head cooling kit, basically there is a water chanber that catches the water that circulates around the inlet manifold, there is water around this to help cold start and emmsions control on cold start. This is the highest point of the gtr cooling system and you will see a bleed valve fitted from the factory for this. The chmaber collect at three points the in the example provided they have simply removed the catch chamber and made pickup point that direct the water straight into a catch can this stops air buble ie steam whic is hoter than water building up and causing uneven cooling of the head. I would also loose the chamber on the underside of the plenum that runs forward and lets the water out of the head at the front of the head where the radiator hose connects. Lose this chamber and tap 3 dash 12 fitting in hear that go straight into you radiator in conjunction with the header tank and you will have a bloody good system!!

Thats half way there that is what the japs refere to as the gt head cooling kit, basically there is a water chanber that catches the water that circulates around the inlet manifold, there is water around this to help cold start and emmsions control on cold start. This is the highest point of the gtr cooling system and you will see a bleed valve fitted from the factory for this. The chmaber collect at three points the in the example provided they have simply removed the catch chamber and made pickup point that direct the water straight into a catch can this stops air buble ie steam whic is hoter than water building up and causing uneven cooling of the head. I would also loose the chamber on the underside of the plenum that runs forward and lets the water out of the head at the front of the head where the radiator hose connects. Lose this chamber and tap 3 dash 12 fitting in hear that go straight into you radiator in conjunction with the header tank and you will have a bloody good system!!

Almost as good as the standard one.

:D cheers :D

haha! Nothing like really!!

Your directing the water straight out of the head into the radiator not allowing it to gather and wait around the bottom of the head till water ahead of it is moved. plus this way increases volume and cooling effeciency as the lines can be kept away from the engine again staying cooler!! The standard sytem is ok but it has its limits and drawback the main one it was designed with cold starts and emissions in mind as well as effiecency. As we are all building race cars (haha) we can get rid of 2 parts of the equation and concentrate on the most important thing cooling of the engine in particular common rb or straight 6 problems of the back of the head heating up air bubbles in the cooling system!

Cheers

I guess theres pros and cons for doing it that way though it would possibly be simpler to retain the std manifold (water collector wise) and run some small bore lines to a header tank at the highest point to prevent buildup of steam pockets . Manufacturers go to a bit of trouble to make cooling systems work because if they don't the business fails .

I agree that having inlet manifolds water heated helps with emissions ( and warm up , and cruise comsumption , and iceing) particularly at small openings but you can get around this to a degree with cooler thermostats if performance is the no 1 priority .

Gary may have asked before but did the GMS cars use all std inlet manifold bits coolant wise ?

Cheers A .

I guess theres pros and cons for doing it that way though it would possibly be simpler to retain the std manifold (water collector wise) and run some small bore lines to a header tank at the highest point to prevent buildup of steam pockets . Manufacturers go to a bit of trouble to make cooling systems work because if they don't the business fails .

I agree that having inlet manifolds water heated helps with emissions ( and warm up , and cruise comsumption , and iceing) particularly at small openings but you can get around this to a degree with cooler thermostats if performance is the no 1 priority .

Gary may have asked before but did the GMS cars use all std inlet manifold bits coolant wise ?

Cheers A .

Hi A, no the Gibson cars had the radiator lowered so that the ambient air inlet and the air filters for the turbos could go above the radiator. Since the radiator was lower, the filler on the header tank was no longer the high point, so it wouldn't collect the air. So they had a aluminium collector mounted up near the brake master cylinders, as it is the high point in the engine bay. It had 3 small hoses so the air could travel up to it, hence eliminating the chance of any trapped air bubbles.

I have posted pictures in the Group A Skylines thread.

:D cheers :D

Manufacturers go to a bit of trouble to make cooling systems work because if they don't the business fails .

Cheers A .

Yes but there's 'work' and 'work'. Does it work when it doesn't puke coolant everywhere in summer and the temp gauge looks good - oem consideration - or does it work when apart from that the front to rear block temp distribution is even and this means all cyl can run on greatest efficiency with no hot spots?

In my BB Chry with cooling mods the temp went up but remained rock solid in all ambient temps under all conditions. Hotter but more constant engine temp with less chance of internal boiling meant greater efficiency, more economy, more driveability and power. I'm not tryng to compare the Chry and the car it was in - recipe for boiling for a lot of reasons - with the RB26 as the GTR even has, heaven forbid, a proper cooling system bleeder stock.

Most of us would agree that a large temp difference between 1 and 6 in an RB26 would not be a good thing, and we'd also agree that a difference must exist. But does anyone know what it is - circumstance dependant of course? Hands down SK. I'm trying to find out if anyone else knows, to see how prevalent the knowledge is of something that we see every time we look under the bonnet but never really see if you know what I mean.

Regards

OK SK, how much is it?

Edited by Scooby
Yes but there's 'work' and 'work'. Does it work when it doesn't puke coolant everywhere in summer and the temp gauge looks good - oem consideration - or does it work when apart from that the front to rear block temp distribution is even and this means all cyl can run on greatest efficiency with no hot spots?

In my BB Chry with cooling mods the temp went up but remained rock solid in all ambient temps under all conditions. Hotter but more constant engine temp with less chance of internal boiling meant greater efficiency, more economy, more driveability and power. I'm not tryng to compare the Chry and the car it was in - recipe for boiling for a lot of reasons - with the RB26 as the GTR even has, heaven forbid, a proper cooling system bleeder stock.

Most of us would agree that a large temp difference between 1 and 6 in an RB26 would not be a good thing, and we'd also agree that a difference must exist. But does anyone know what it is - circumstance dependant of course? Hands down SK. I'm trying to find out if anyone else knows, to see how prevalent the knowledge is of something that we see every time we look under the bonnet but never really see if you know what I mean.

Regards

OK SK, how much is it?

The issue here is the drag racing guys don't really care, the run is too short for it to be an issue. If they have huge power, they concrete or expoxy fill the block, which changes the fluid flow dramatically.

Only the ciruit racing guys really experience temperature differential over time. We don't go much over 650 bhp as the additional lag at that power level makes the car slower. Hence we don't see large temperature differences, it is only on the engine dyno that I have been able to measure it with any accuracy. One day I will stick a temp probe under each spark plug washer (like we do on the karts) and measure it during a race. But it honestly, so far has not been an issue for us, so it's not high on the priority list.

;) cheers :)

You're kind of right with the drag race engine, but this subject on the No. 6 lean out interested me enough to setup the engine/trans in our race car to be capable of running longer before a run than usual.

1 reason so as not to get burnt down on the start line and second reason was to keep all the temperatures up and stable for the run down the strip.

Back to that water setup, I cant post the photo from our web site so I'll explain it a little.

TurboX has used a Diesel fuel filter housing turned upside down with the drain vent to the top placed near the brake booster (filter removed). All the small water hoses for the intake manifold stay in the stock position but are 'T'd off to the housing where the steam is released.

You can check it out at Turboclub.com just look up for the Skyline GTS4 RB20DET mods.

It's a great idea of His, but such a pain in the neck to fit hoses to with that modified intake plenum.

Cheers.

If fuel pressure is a factor why not turn the fuel rail around so that the inlet is at the front and the pressure reg is at the back? if the leaning out issue is tranfered to the front cylinder you then know that fuel pressure is a factor.

just a thought

Just to clarify the fuel rail pressure drop, in hydrualics if you have 2 cylinders on the same line the furthermost will rise first and the closest will extend last, to get even pressure on both you use a regulator block to split it evenly. If you put a Y piece in the results vary but is a more even rise but for accuracy is useless.

Just to put a different spin on it, you guys explained it well but even I got a bit lost there LOl.

The issue here is the drag racing guys don't really care, the run is too short for it to be an issue. If they have huge power, they concrete or expoxy fill the block, which changes the fluid flow dramatically.

Only the ciruit racing guys really experience temperature differential over time. We don't go much over 650 bhp as the additional lag at that power level makes the car slower. Hence we don't see large temperature differences, it is only on the engine dyno that I have been able to measure it with any accuracy. One day I will stick a temp probe under each spark plug washer (like we do on the karts) and measure it during a race. But it honestly, so far has not been an issue for us, so it's not high on the priority list.

:) cheers :P

I guess temp is not the only determinant of pocket boiling in a pressurised system, the presence of air plays a major - if not the major - part also. Even if there is a relatively consistent temp front to rear, cavitation caused by the pump, or insufficent bleeding will produce air in the system so eventually the water will boil where the air is - for example it will even boil where the engine 'seen' temp is coolest if there is air in the system at that point. So consistent front to rear temp would be great, as long as we can make sure that the air is out.

Cheers

Edited by Scooby

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...