Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey lads, i just have a question about cylinder compression,

depending on what power your making will the cylinder compression be different?

FOR EXAMPLE if a r33 skyline is making 400rwkw will the compression in each cylinder be higher than one making 200rwkw? or should it be the same...

i really dont know anything about this so its probably a stupid question and obvious answer....

I have a 1994 R33 GTS25T making 209.8kw atw @12psi:

the compression test was as follows:

-----Leak Down--------Compression

1.-----15%----------------125psi

2.-----15%----------------125psi

3.-----15%----------------125psi

4.-----15%----------------125psi

5.-----15%----------------125psi

6.-----15%----------------130psi

may car had travvelled 123,500kms when this test was done.... and now only has 126,200kms on it

is this a good result or not so good result, please.... any advice would be much appreciated.

Beef

Edited by Beef
  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The compression ratio is a physical property of the engine. Broadly think of the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at bottom dead centre & compare that to the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at top dead centre. You (for an Rb) will get a number about 8.5 to 1 or slightly higher depending on which Rb variant you have.

with compression tests there are a number of things to look for...one is the total variance between highest to lowest. Your results look good in that regard.

However the "stock compression" from memory is 175/180 in a R33GTST...when I had mine tested my results were in the 165 bracket and its done about 100k. I was very happy with that.

I would be suggesting your figures are low...however the total variance is well within range.

Not being an expert though. some1 else might have a better analysis

The compression ratio is a physical property of the engine. Broadly think of the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at bottom dead centre & compare that to the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at top dead centre. You (for an Rb) will get a number about 8.5 to 1 or slightly higher depending on which Rb variant you have.

excellent description of what "compression" actually is, but it fails to answer both my questions:

1. higher output engine = higher compression per cylinder?

2. are my results of my compression test good, average or bad?

Beef

Edited by Beef
with compression tests there are a number of things to look for...one is the total variance between highest to lowest. Your results look good in that regard.

However the "stock compression" from memory is 175/180 in a R33GTST...when I had mine tested my results were in the 165 bracket and its done about 100k. I was very happy with that.

I would be suggesting your figures are low...however the total variance is well within range.

Not being an expert though. some1 else might have a better analysis

ok, so what does it mean.... lower compression more worn engine?

is there any way to make the compression higher if it gets a bit low.... for example, is there any way to get the compression back up to 170psi from 125psi like my engine currently is?

Beef

ok, so what does it mean.... lower compression more worn engine?

Yes.

is there any way to make the compression higher if it gets a bit low.... for example, is there any way to get the compression back up to 170psi from 125psi like my engine currently is?

No. You basically have to rebuild the motor.

To answer the question implicit in your original post:

Testing a modded (Stock internal) motor for compression should give the same numbers as an unmodified motor.

BUT

When operating at full output the BMEP of the modded motor will obviously be higher.

Yes.

No. You basically have to rebuild the motor.

To answer the question implicit in your original post:

Testing a modded (Stock internal) motor for compression should give the same numbers as an unmodified motor.

BUT

When operating at full output the BMEP of the modded motor will obviously be higher.

cheers DJR.... makes sense now, but to thebest of my knowledge my engine was rebuilt in 2004 at about 80,000kms.... and im not sure if the compression test was done before or after... maybe i should get another one done, how much do they cahrge approx for it...

Beef

15% leakage coupled with the low comp suggests it's just a reasonably tired motor. but nothing to worry about too much as they are all fairly even, albeit at the lower limit of acceptable compression.

ahh, if the engine was rebuilt that changes things. does it have forged pistons?

how does it make any difference... i dont think it has forged pistons.... no..

so what does this mean now?

Edited by Beef

It makes a difference on two counts:

1. If the pistons are not standard they may have a different compression ratio and also the new engine may have a thicker head gasket (to give but two examples) In short the number shown in the Nissan manual may no longer apply.

2. If it is only two years old it should still have good compression.

Your first post read like the test was done only recently on this motor.

But then you have said that you are not sure which motor it was done on?

If you are having problems with the motor (Are you?) then it sounds like you need another test done as the numbers are indicative of an old, tired motor. What I cannot explain is why the numbers are so close together. Usually the lower they are the further apart (cylinder to cylinder) they get....

sorry beef i asked for the reasons djr81 posted. also some engine builder may use a larger piston to bore clearance when cold which if the test was done on a cold motor (shouldn't have been) you would get a very low reading like you have there.

yeah any1 who has done a compression test knows to warm the car...so i assume that was done properly...125 is very low IMO...and you are right it seems wierd cos usually one or two cyl. are llower than the rest...from my experience anyway

without factoring in the rebuild..mine is a 94, 101,000km and was in the 160s-165s as above...this is the origional engine...mainly stock. Just as a reference.

If one cyl. is a bit low this can be put down to carbon bulid up etc...but not that low...

125psi is pretty low.

ive rebuilt my motor with standard internals and im getting 125psi BEFORE the run in.

go get another comp test done.

the figures seem TOO close together. if they were that low i would think there would be small variances of 3-5psi between them at least. thats my opinion rather than expert advice so just get another one done somewhere else.

ok, well it looks like im gona need to get another one from a different person.....

what is the process of a compression test.... like how do they do it?

just by comptuer testing through the console or what....?

and also what does it roughly cost to get one done?

Beef

no need to answer those questions:

1. how do they do it:

first they take off the coil packs and remove the spark plugs and test it that way.... that way i can get my coil packs and plugs looked at at the same time....

2. i can get one done by a genuine nissan dealer for $40

sound good?

Beef

hey all,

just another question, its booked in to have another compression test done this afternoon, but if it turns out the same results...

what does that mean?

is there any real worry.... if i drive it normally is there going to be any detrimental effects?

is it going to have any bad repocussions?

please advise...

Tim

it's no big worry mate. just keep an eye on the oil level to make sure it's not using oil too much (and if it is just keep topping it up). it wont cause you any major problems, it's just symptom of a tired engine with worn rings. it may cost you a little power but if you cant afford the rebuild now dont worry about it, just start saving for when you can rebuild it.

it's no big worry mate. just keep an eye on the oil level to make sure it's not using oil too much (and if it is just keep topping it up). it wont cause you any major problems, it's just symptom of a tired engine with worn rings. it may cost you a little power but if you cant afford the rebuild now dont worry about it, just start saving for when you can rebuild it.

ok well thats good to hear, so what your saying is that there is no huge risk and if i drive it nice and steady adn normal, there will be nothing to worry about?

Beef

it's no big worry mate. just keep an eye on the oil level to make sure it's not using oil too much (and if it is just keep topping it up). it wont cause you any major problems, it's just symptom of a tired engine with worn rings. it may cost you a little power but if you cant afford the rebuild now dont worry about it, just start saving for when you can rebuild it.

as for teh oil, it doesnt use any.....

its last service was on 123,500 and now its 126,700 and it hasnt used a drop.....

so there is nothing to worry about there, and it doesnt blow smoke or anythign.... it goes good.....

so yeah.... maybe its not as bad as i first thought..

Beef

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the territory of the "Stage 1/2/3 Golf GTI/R" or otherwise off the shelf tune with (relative to before) minor mods. It's easier now. Downpipe and Tune and boom, big increases. Stage 1 OEM+ is where it's at. This is where the niche evolved into and it's really easy to see why. It's rare to even NEED to consider changing turbos or going to aftermarket ECU's or building bottom ends for more power. Stage 1-2-3 will get you a LONG WAY. Civic Type R turbo GR Yaris/Corolla Anything with B58 (MKV Supra/x40i) Anything BMW in General Anything Audi in General Any turbo AMG RenaultSport Turbo offerings Korean Elantra N/I30N Ecoboost Mustangs Focus RS? List goes on. I would argue in the future it won't even need to go on... M3P is pretty rapid out of the box...
    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
×
×
  • Create New...