Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey lads, i just have a question about cylinder compression,

depending on what power your making will the cylinder compression be different?

FOR EXAMPLE if a r33 skyline is making 400rwkw will the compression in each cylinder be higher than one making 200rwkw? or should it be the same...

i really dont know anything about this so its probably a stupid question and obvious answer....

I have a 1994 R33 GTS25T making 209.8kw atw @12psi:

the compression test was as follows:

-----Leak Down--------Compression

1.-----15%----------------125psi

2.-----15%----------------125psi

3.-----15%----------------125psi

4.-----15%----------------125psi

5.-----15%----------------125psi

6.-----15%----------------130psi

may car had travvelled 123,500kms when this test was done.... and now only has 126,200kms on it

is this a good result or not so good result, please.... any advice would be much appreciated.

Beef

Edited by Beef
  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The compression ratio is a physical property of the engine. Broadly think of the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at bottom dead centre & compare that to the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at top dead centre. You (for an Rb) will get a number about 8.5 to 1 or slightly higher depending on which Rb variant you have.

with compression tests there are a number of things to look for...one is the total variance between highest to lowest. Your results look good in that regard.

However the "stock compression" from memory is 175/180 in a R33GTST...when I had mine tested my results were in the 165 bracket and its done about 100k. I was very happy with that.

I would be suggesting your figures are low...however the total variance is well within range.

Not being an expert though. some1 else might have a better analysis

The compression ratio is a physical property of the engine. Broadly think of the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at bottom dead centre & compare that to the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at top dead centre. You (for an Rb) will get a number about 8.5 to 1 or slightly higher depending on which Rb variant you have.

excellent description of what "compression" actually is, but it fails to answer both my questions:

1. higher output engine = higher compression per cylinder?

2. are my results of my compression test good, average or bad?

Beef

Edited by Beef
with compression tests there are a number of things to look for...one is the total variance between highest to lowest. Your results look good in that regard.

However the "stock compression" from memory is 175/180 in a R33GTST...when I had mine tested my results were in the 165 bracket and its done about 100k. I was very happy with that.

I would be suggesting your figures are low...however the total variance is well within range.

Not being an expert though. some1 else might have a better analysis

ok, so what does it mean.... lower compression more worn engine?

is there any way to make the compression higher if it gets a bit low.... for example, is there any way to get the compression back up to 170psi from 125psi like my engine currently is?

Beef

ok, so what does it mean.... lower compression more worn engine?

Yes.

is there any way to make the compression higher if it gets a bit low.... for example, is there any way to get the compression back up to 170psi from 125psi like my engine currently is?

No. You basically have to rebuild the motor.

To answer the question implicit in your original post:

Testing a modded (Stock internal) motor for compression should give the same numbers as an unmodified motor.

BUT

When operating at full output the BMEP of the modded motor will obviously be higher.

Yes.

No. You basically have to rebuild the motor.

To answer the question implicit in your original post:

Testing a modded (Stock internal) motor for compression should give the same numbers as an unmodified motor.

BUT

When operating at full output the BMEP of the modded motor will obviously be higher.

cheers DJR.... makes sense now, but to thebest of my knowledge my engine was rebuilt in 2004 at about 80,000kms.... and im not sure if the compression test was done before or after... maybe i should get another one done, how much do they cahrge approx for it...

Beef

15% leakage coupled with the low comp suggests it's just a reasonably tired motor. but nothing to worry about too much as they are all fairly even, albeit at the lower limit of acceptable compression.

ahh, if the engine was rebuilt that changes things. does it have forged pistons?

how does it make any difference... i dont think it has forged pistons.... no..

so what does this mean now?

Edited by Beef

It makes a difference on two counts:

1. If the pistons are not standard they may have a different compression ratio and also the new engine may have a thicker head gasket (to give but two examples) In short the number shown in the Nissan manual may no longer apply.

2. If it is only two years old it should still have good compression.

Your first post read like the test was done only recently on this motor.

But then you have said that you are not sure which motor it was done on?

If you are having problems with the motor (Are you?) then it sounds like you need another test done as the numbers are indicative of an old, tired motor. What I cannot explain is why the numbers are so close together. Usually the lower they are the further apart (cylinder to cylinder) they get....

sorry beef i asked for the reasons djr81 posted. also some engine builder may use a larger piston to bore clearance when cold which if the test was done on a cold motor (shouldn't have been) you would get a very low reading like you have there.

yeah any1 who has done a compression test knows to warm the car...so i assume that was done properly...125 is very low IMO...and you are right it seems wierd cos usually one or two cyl. are llower than the rest...from my experience anyway

without factoring in the rebuild..mine is a 94, 101,000km and was in the 160s-165s as above...this is the origional engine...mainly stock. Just as a reference.

If one cyl. is a bit low this can be put down to carbon bulid up etc...but not that low...

125psi is pretty low.

ive rebuilt my motor with standard internals and im getting 125psi BEFORE the run in.

go get another comp test done.

the figures seem TOO close together. if they were that low i would think there would be small variances of 3-5psi between them at least. thats my opinion rather than expert advice so just get another one done somewhere else.

ok, well it looks like im gona need to get another one from a different person.....

what is the process of a compression test.... like how do they do it?

just by comptuer testing through the console or what....?

and also what does it roughly cost to get one done?

Beef

no need to answer those questions:

1. how do they do it:

first they take off the coil packs and remove the spark plugs and test it that way.... that way i can get my coil packs and plugs looked at at the same time....

2. i can get one done by a genuine nissan dealer for $40

sound good?

Beef

hey all,

just another question, its booked in to have another compression test done this afternoon, but if it turns out the same results...

what does that mean?

is there any real worry.... if i drive it normally is there going to be any detrimental effects?

is it going to have any bad repocussions?

please advise...

Tim

it's no big worry mate. just keep an eye on the oil level to make sure it's not using oil too much (and if it is just keep topping it up). it wont cause you any major problems, it's just symptom of a tired engine with worn rings. it may cost you a little power but if you cant afford the rebuild now dont worry about it, just start saving for when you can rebuild it.

it's no big worry mate. just keep an eye on the oil level to make sure it's not using oil too much (and if it is just keep topping it up). it wont cause you any major problems, it's just symptom of a tired engine with worn rings. it may cost you a little power but if you cant afford the rebuild now dont worry about it, just start saving for when you can rebuild it.

ok well thats good to hear, so what your saying is that there is no huge risk and if i drive it nice and steady adn normal, there will be nothing to worry about?

Beef

it's no big worry mate. just keep an eye on the oil level to make sure it's not using oil too much (and if it is just keep topping it up). it wont cause you any major problems, it's just symptom of a tired engine with worn rings. it may cost you a little power but if you cant afford the rebuild now dont worry about it, just start saving for when you can rebuild it.

as for teh oil, it doesnt use any.....

its last service was on 123,500 and now its 126,700 and it hasnt used a drop.....

so there is nothing to worry about there, and it doesnt blow smoke or anythign.... it goes good.....

so yeah.... maybe its not as bad as i first thought..

Beef

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My goals for it atm are to get it registered, respray and some mild power gains eventually... I picked up the car from an elderly gentleman near the border of NSW and VIC, its honestly a bit rough and looks like its been driven on a farm (because there was so much dirt underneath). Last week I dropped the subframe and emptied the old fuel out + added a new fuel pump (think the old one went bad from old fuel). Now I'm onto fixing a coolant leak at the rear of the engine + adding a new radiator as the old one is corroded. After that i have a new bumper, coils (as the old were leaking) and lots more
    • Welcome buddy! Plenty on here and YouTube. What are your plans for it? Good luck with the Rwc and Rego bud!
    • Love this so much! Please post a photo when you have a bike on the trailer.  I was a little bit worried about having a tow bar on the Skyline, but having it hidden behind the number plate is genius
    • Came here to say, put all the wiring from the new motor and gearbox in that you can, then throw the stock ECUs in the bin, and get an aftermarket ECU. Should be pretty easy if you can use a multimeter and read a wiring diagram to then use a PNP aftermarket ECU to suit the motors wiring loom, and make the minimal changes you will to get it to work in with the body loom (If any). This will mean you can very easily circumvent/bypass the Park/Neutral start disable switch, and get everything running really easy!
    • If the roof is dual skinned the whole way, IE, there's a "top" metal piece, and a "bottom" metal piece, to slow it down as much as you practically can, you should be able to get an attachment for a spray can/your spray gun, where it is a long, thin flexible hose, and when you're "spraying" it is spraying it in every direction possible. The I'd get that, and feed it through the roof as much and as far as you can. It's basically like fish oiling the car, but you're soaking it in rust converter. Then do the fix like Murray has described having cleaned up the existing metal as much as you humanly can. I'd also throw as much rust converter on that exposed metal before putting the fibreglass/metal filler over everything.   As for welding a replacement in. I've owned my own MIG welder for about 10 years. I've also worked in an industry doing MIG welding for a job for about 3 months dead straight, and we were doing 11.5 hour work days 5 days a week, plus a Saturday 6 hour day. (I then moved over to running the massive CNC plasma as I could understand the technology, and work with the main guy out there). I also f**k around with my welders a bit at home. So what I'm saying here is, I've probably got more hours on a MIG gun than you'll manage to get under your sleeve doing home sorts of jobs over the next 5 years. I also have an ACDC TIG that I got myself a year or two back. I've got a short amount of experience on the TIG only. My home MIG is also presently setup for doing thin sheet metal. Unless I didn't care about how that roof looked, and I just wanted a functional metal roof, and it being out of alignment, warped, and bowed, I would NOT attempt a roof replacement UNLESS I could do it as a whole panel like Murray described where the spot welds were.  Welding has this REALLY annoying thing, where if you want something to be perfectly square, unless you can clamp that thing to damn perfection (Welding fixture table), it is NOT going to be square, so you start to learn, the type of metal you're working with, how thick it is etc, and weld in VERY specific ways, and by knowing how YOU are as a welder, so that as the welds cool, the metal work pulls itself into place. If you want to see some cool tricky shit done, Bennets Customs is an Aussie guy, and he mentions a guy a lot call "Kyle", who is from "Make It Kustom". Watch some of their welding videos, especially on sheet metal. You can use the welder to shrink the steel in, and you can also use the welder to stretch the panel out. When you have the skill level that I have, you can shrink the metal in and out... But never on purpose like those two guys do. You just manage to f**k it all up. Then I smack it around with a hammer till it sits lower than I will want it too, then I shove filler on top and then pray to deitys that I can sand it into some form of sane shape that doesn't look like a dog has taken a shit, after eating a tonne of pumice stone... I'm all for DIY, and for learning, and please, feel free to give it a go, but be aware, you need to live with the consequences of how time consuming it is to do, AND that it's going to look no where near as good as what you can make it look with just some filler now. Oh AND, even once you replace it, it's like to still rust away again eventually, because you'll have missed putting primer and paint on some part of the newly welded in sheet metal, or against part of the existing metal you couldn't get to...   Oh, and to weld all that in, you will need to pull the window out, and strip at least the roof and A Pillars of interior trim and wiring. You'll then need things like the big fire proof/weld spatter proof mats to lay down, OR you'll end up needing to strip the ENTIRE interior to avoid sending it all up in a ball of flames. If you want to see how annoying sheet metal is to weld, head to bunnings, buy there 600x600 1.6mm mild steel (Not GAL!) sheet, and cut a few pieces, and try and weld them together. Then understand, 1.6mm sheet is nearly 50 to 100% THICKER than the cars sheet metal.   The photos I posted before, I'm replacing with 1.2mm thick mild sheet, and it's very easy to blow through both the original steel (Especially if I hit an area that should have probably been cut out a bit more) or straight through the new sheet metal. And I'm doing the floor, which can be hidden easily, and doesn't matter how pretty I make it, as long as it's damn strong! I'm also doing it in a 4WD, that has seen many off road trails, and doesn't need to look that pretty ever
×
×
  • Create New...