Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No worries Biz , actually I stuffed up earlier on and was thinking RB20 .

The real GT3071R is shown on the turbobygarrett site , you need to have a look at the turbo comparison sheet by clicking on the lower RHS of the small or medium or large frame turbo list boxes . Its the last of three and the table quotes 450Hp compared to 420 for the two victim versions .

I looked at the maps for 71mm 56T in .50AR TO4E cover (GT3071R) and 76mm 56T in .60AR TO4E cover (GT3076R/GT30R) . While the maximum or choke flow is not too different the compressor speed lines are .

The GT30R gets to ~ 50lbs air at approx 60% efficiency and a little over 115,000 rpm and 1 bar boost . The GT3071R just gets there at 2.2 bar (positive) and up around 145,000 rpm .

So you can see that the 3071R is really spinning its tits off at twice the positive pressure to move the air .

To me it seems that the 71mm or GT35 compressor is at its end in the TO4E series comp cover which was originally intended for 76mm compressors . The 76mm or GT37 compressor (GT30R/GT3076R/GT3037) would probably do a similar thing if used in a TO4S cover designed for 76 and 82mm wheels .

Its difficult to make a direct comparison of the GT30R and GT3071R because they give different results based on comp diametre , trim size and comp cover series and AR ratio .

The best results I've heard of on an SR20 was using a HKS GT3037 in 52 compressor trim/.50AR TO4E comp cover and HKS's .73AR non gated T28 flanged GT30 style turbine housing . I think it came on boost at 2500 rpm and made around 400 ponies at the wheels of a Sentra SE/R . It could have been an old article from the American site Nissan Performance Magazine . By best I mean usable on the street , don't know about the front wheel drive though . O/T but its far far simpler , and cheaper , to fit a GT28RS on the GTiR exhaust manifold for ~ 300 at the wheels - assumes early high port head . Its what I'd do for a road car because larger turbos raise the state of tune enough to make them tiresome to live with .

Also the GTiR's quad throttle inlet system fits the early head . I'd do this because it fits in with the more flow and power for less boost . Factory engineering is hard to beat when they've developed homologation special performance bits .

Cheers A .

Hmm... Since the HKS T300 is rated at 450hp im not really sure anymore if it would be worthwhile upgrading to a new one, getting new piping etc made. The T300 started making boost from memory at 3300ish and full boost by around 4000-4200rpm, if possible i could get some input on modifying that.

I've gotten some measurements off it, but are unsure of the trim as i havent pulled the housings off it:

Compressor

a/r .60

Inducer 53mm

Turbine

a/r: .63

Exducer 57mm

Its also due for a service, as whoever owned it before didnt look after it, and has some shaft play, and has damage to the compressor wheel from running no air filter. So i guess my questions are:

If the turbo is rated at 450hp, tuned correctly and everything being normal, should it be making more than 270rwkw?

If it is at the limits of the turbo, when i change the cams/valvetrain apart from the usual power advantages, the rev limit can be raised from the 7300rpm its at now to 9000rpm. Will the current turbo have a boost drop and suffocate the engine at that high rpm?

Would say changing to a bigger exhaust housing fix that?

Cheers - i know this isnt skyline/RB related and might irritate some people, so thanks for the input

Lets see. 450hp = ~330kw flywheel style. So you would estimate around 270-280rwkw would be expected.

By putting a bigger exhaust housing you can probably pick up another 10rwkw but it really depends on whats holding you back. Is the compressor is at max flow or is the turbine choking the engine? Probably the former. Or both.

So, if the turbo is limiting the engine, raising the rev limit will do nothing. On the dyno you'd probably see the power just fall away as the revs rise past the power peak. If the turbo had more steam in her, the power would continue rising.

So yeah, you need a bigger turbo to reach your goals. A turbo rated at least 500hp to get comfortably over 300rwkw.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • Those above shitboxes, mediocre and above usually have a turbo strapped to them, hence the slightly higher octane is required.  
    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
×
×
  • Create New...