Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Peeps,

I have done a bit of reading and i have a few mixed opions on adjusting a

aftermarket bov ,now i know how to but where is the "sweet spot",

now i have read that some people run it so that it wont open and until

positive boost is reached, others before. now the first i think is the right idea

and you woundt get really and compressor surge ,just seeing what we all think.

Regards Lee :/

It depends on your setup really.

If the bov vents to atmosphere then it absolutely has to stay seated until you acheive positive pressure or you will run into stalling problems.

If the bov is plumbed back then you can get away with it being open at idle as there is vacuum in the plenum sucking it open, provided that boost pressure isn't also forcing it open at partial and full throttle and so wasting the turbos effort.

I still like mine to be completely closed until it sees boost though, even though it's plumbed back.

you dont want either of your two options. if it open when positive boost is achieved then you will just be venting boost everytime your turbo spools up. if it's open whilst under vacuum then it will be leaking all the time whilst you are off the throttle/part throttle. it should only vent when there is a pressure differential between the intercooler piping and the plenum (post throttle). the area post throttle is under vacuum and the area pre throttle will be under a temporary pressure spike, this is when the bov opens and vents the excess boost. as soon as this differential is reduced it will (should) snap shut.

..provided that boost pressure isn't also forcing it open at partial and full throttle and so wasting the turbos effort.

this *shouldnt* actually happen because both sides of the diaphragm will be seeing the same boost pressure. although a pressure loss through the IC may give a difference between the boost on the vacuum feed and the boost on the IC pipe that the BOV is on, if its mounted before the IC.

even though my BOV is also plumbed back, i still get a drop in revs below idle sometimes when i get off the throttle sharply :D

i dont think there is any sweet spot so to speak either, but then it just goes back to the age old argument of how a bov really affects your cars performance, if you think the 'unloaded' compressor surge on closed throttle causes damage or slows your car down, then adjust the bov so it opens asap without causing stalling issues. if your a believer of the other side of the fence, which i am, you can set it at a higher point so that it only opens when you hit high boost.

Edited by mokompri

I knew someone would have something to say. Thats waht happens when you have to rush a response :D

I should clarify. I was mainly refering to throttle closed situations, not throttle open situations.

When throttle is closed on gear change, you only want it venting when there is positive pressure in front of the bov, not everytime the throttle is closed.

What you want is the spring to be stiff enough that it is only opening when you are making positive pressure as you change gear, if you know what i mean, or it will be open as you slow to idle and cause stalling problems.

Partial throttle situations where you are making boost will cause a pressure differential if you have a slight lift off, which i also don't like

Edited by BHDave

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...