Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

What the hell is this topic about?

Drag car engines? The rb26 Vs the jz. Both these motors are the wrong weapon of choice to build an outright drag car around for the sake of drag racing, doing low times and nothing else. I'll have one of those sainty 3 valve topfuel engines thanks.

There are plenty of different categories in drag racing and to each his own. Each type offers a different experience and cost. People who try to drag race 4wd skylines in the pure sense of drag racing are up against it. Clearly these people enjoy the challenge to see how fast they can get a a rather difficult drivetrain config to go in a drag racing environment. It would be far easier to just ditch the IRS, full chasis and tub a GTR to go much faster but, thats not what these people are about. I think perhaps they enjoy the added thrill of having the front driven wheels trying to pull them into the concrete barriers.

Now for the same wierd reasons people in these GTR's with Rb26's might like to retain that particular motor in the spirit of all things nissan. Hence they tend not to take them out to put JZ series engines in, which to be honest isn't the best choice for a power upgrade if that was the aim.

What the hell is this topic about?

Drag car engines? The rb26 Vs the jz. Both these motors are the wrong weapon of choice to build an outright drag car around for the sake of drag racing, doing low times and nothing else. I'll have one of those sainty 3 valve topfuel engines thanks.

There are plenty of different categories in drag racing and to each his own. Each type offers a different experience and cost. People who try to drag race 4wd skylines in the pure sense of drag racing are up against it. Clearly these people enjoy the challenge to see how fast they can get a a rather difficult drivetrain config to go in a drag racing environment. It would be far easier to just ditch the IRS, full chasis and tub a GTR to go much faster but, thats not what these people are about. I think perhaps they enjoy the added thrill of having the front driven wheels trying to pull them into the concrete barriers.

Now for the same wierd reasons people in these GTR's with Rb26's might like to retain that particular motor in the spirit of all things nissan. Hence they tend not to take them out to put JZ series engines in, which to be honest isn't the best choice for a power upgrade if that was the aim.

its a thread that was started cause a moderator didnt like the other thread which should have been locked or deleted to have a slow death, but instead singled out my post to start yet another dumb arse thread.

I took it off this morning, had a little revamp. Sly ones from you!!!hahaha

We blew that photo up and made a banner out of it for his 21st it was golden!!

Send me a pm talked to ray bout the stoode, there will need to be a lot of sacrifices I will fill in the details later.

I think fair example might be Rockos performance rx7, standard 2j, runs mid 8s, tough, even though its in a Mazda, just gos to show that the straight sixes are gaining respect from the drag racing community that was prodominantly v8s and rotarys.

hang on, are we talking about head flow or capacity or turbo size or fuel or 4wd or rwd?

titan runs their equivlient of sport rwd if you read the NHRA sport compact rule book, their rules are the same as the ones we play by, as our rule book is a direct copy of theirs. so is it an even footing, maybe not but they have the same opporunities within the rules. theo runs the same turbo as the titan supra a t88 38gk the supra doesnt run a Gt55, their pro rwd scion and celica run Gt55 according to the titan website

post-20078-1153192777.jpg

Edited by BezerkR32
I think fair example might be Rockos performance rx7, standard 2j, runs mid 8s, tough, even though its in a Mazda, just gos to show that the straight sixes are gaining respect from the drag racing community that was prodominantly v8s and rotarys.

and its only a 2jzge N/A motor not a turbo motor.

so its runs high compression and no oil squirters like its GTE cousin.

What the hell is this topic about?

Drag car engines? The rb26 Vs the jz. Both these motors are the wrong weapon of choice to build an outright drag car around for the sake of drag racing, doing low times and nothing else. I'll have one of those sainty 3 valve topfuel engines thanks.

There are plenty of different categories in drag racing and to each his own. Each type offers a different experience and cost. People who try to drag race 4wd skylines in the pure sense of drag racing are up against it. Clearly these people enjoy the challenge to see how fast they can get a a rather difficult drivetrain config to go in a drag racing environment. It would be far easier to just ditch the IRS, full chasis and tub a GTR to go much faster but, thats not what these people are about. I think perhaps they enjoy the added thrill of having the front driven wheels trying to pull them into the concrete barriers.

Now for the same wierd reasons people in these GTR's with Rb26's might like to retain that particular motor in the spirit of all things nissan. Hence they tend not to take them out to put JZ series engines in, which to be honest isn't the best choice for a power upgrade if that was the aim.

Exactly. Very well said. If only I could go back 5 years with what I now know! The problem with many "drag cars" is that they start out as nice street cars & somewhere the line between street & drag becomes blurred.

I have a very tidy R33 GTR that has only 20,000 genuine kms & was a beautiful streetable 10 sec car. I had "old shcool" drag cars in the past & got out of them because I couldn't use them on the street & was at the mercy of the local track's schedule. My GTR is now totally unusable as a street car, has been off the road for years due to a lack of interest, money, & a place to race it (AIR has been closed for ages) & now, after a long struggle, we have finally got it ready. If I had used my brains & foreseen the huge amount of money & time that was going to go into this car & what sort of times it was going to pull once finished, I never would have done it. Of course, I now have no choice & will race the car as soon as I can, & have great fun doing so, but if I was going to set out building a dedicated drag car from the start it would never have been a Skyline GTR - It would have been a BA falcon or VZ Monaro body with a Keith black V8, massive rear slicks, & been running 7 seconds with some type of reliability & cost a lot less money than the Nissan.

Fast GTRs are awesome fun to drag race & very challenging, but at the end of the day, the small capacity engine, the 4WD system, the banger style clutches, & the weight of these cars are huge drawbacks if it is only going to be used at the drag track. The great thing about GTRs is their street & circuit racing capabilities & it is in these places the Skyline is a supercar. I am not surprised there are so few other GTRs in Australia running into the nines - it is just not good value for money.

A small handful of die-hards (including me) will soldier on because we have passed the point of no return, & because we are addicted to fighting the cars all the way down the track, & lots of Skyline fans will love to watch because they are entertaining to see.

I heard my GTR run today for the first time in 3 1/2 years & it sounded awesome running on methanol.

Pity that we have nowhere to race in Adelaide. Looks like I might be buying a container.

Exactly. Very well said. If only I could go back 5 years with what I now know! The problem with many "drag cars" is that they start out as nice street cars & somewhere the line between street & drag becomes blurred.

I have a very tidy R33 GTR that has only 20,000 genuine kms & was a beautiful streetable 10 sec car. I had "old shcool" drag cars in the past & got out of them because I couldn't use them on the street & was at the mercy of the local track's schedule. My GTR is now totally unusable as a street car, has been off the road for years due to a lack of interest, money, & a place to race it (AIR has been closed for ages) & now, after a long struggle, we have finally got it ready. If I had used my brains & foreseen the huge amount of money & time that was going to go into this car & what sort of times it was going to pull once finished, I never would have done it. Of course, I now have no choice & will race the car as soon as I can, & have great fun doing so, but if I was going to set out building a dedicated drag car from the start it would never have been a Skyline GTR - It would have been a BA falcon or VZ Monaro body with a Keith black V8, massive rear slicks, & been running 7 seconds with some type of reliability & cost a lot less money than the Nissan.

Fast GTRs are awesome fun to drag race & very challenging, but at the end of the day, the small capacity engine, the 4WD system, the banger style clutches, & the weight of these cars are huge drawbacks if it is only going to be used at the drag track. The great thing about GTRs is their street & circuit racing capabilities & it is in these places the Skyline is a supercar. I am not surprised there are so few other GTRs in Australia running into the nines - it is just not good value for money.

A small handful of die-hards (including me) will soldier on because we have passed the point of no return, & because we are addicted to fighting the cars all the way down the track, & lots of Skyline fans will love to watch because they are entertaining to see.

I heard my GTR run today for the first time in 3 1/2 years & it sounded awesome running on methanol.

Pity that we have nowhere to race in Adelaide. Looks like I might be buying a container.

What a great post, one of the best I have read on SAU. It’s because of John and others like him that we have Sports Compact drag racing with GTR’s. I don’t go to race meetings unless I am crewing, but if you get your mate with the silver GTR to come along to WSID, I’ll make an exception and be there to see a side by side 8.

:( cheers ;)

My GTR is turnkey & ready to go save for a small issue with the new Turbo - should be dynoed & ready within a couple of weeks.

Keir & I have discussed taking the GTRs to Kwinana for the Drag Wars meeting in November, past that I am not sure.

We sure would like to run 8 seconds together on the same pass.

My car only ran 9.4 back in April 2003 (last time I raced it!) so I am just

keen to see an 8.99 or 2 first & get used to the car before we push it

too hard.

hey Adrian, fiddy of what?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...