Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah tottally agree with you mate, and not forgetting this is a GTS4 so more losses in the drive train compared to a GTS-T and from what I understand The gtrs is still fairly efficent over 18psi.

I want one!!!

not sure how much drivetrain loss there is as it was run in rwd...i read somewhere that drivetrain loss is about 17% so that would make it 252kw at the flywheel?

the cheapest prices on GTRS kits are on ns.com and nengun.com...

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I had my car tuned at Dr Drifts as well about a fortnight ago. Full 3" zorst, FMIC, fuel pump, GT2871r @ 16psi it made 183rwkw, no cams. This was all through a bit shift kitted VLT auto though...with a manual I would expect it to be slightly higher

Mines a 400hp spec GT2871r

have you got a dyno sheet? be interesting to see the midrange power....is yours the .64 or .86 exhaust housing?

Cool. so lookign forward to swapping keys at DECA. Forget dyno figures see how they drive back to back...plsu Dr Drifts dyno seems pretty lazy. Roll on DECA :)

would be interesting to see how your set up goes on this dyno...there should be a dyno day at DrDrifts in a few months time......time for a few myths to be busted :O

yeah, i was talkin to sam when he was in adelaide and he used a sorta low reading dyno here and i asked him about it and he said his dyno reads even lower.

and drive trains dont lose a percentage of your total power, they lose a static amount of power (but different amounts in different gears and depends on rim size(weight) etc)

Edited by salad

i fitted the 56t version, but slightly bigger front wheel spec (compared to gtrs) gt2871r to my s15. Hoping to get it tuned in the next couple of days. I know its not a rb20 but its still 2l capacity. Im on full boost @ 4000rpm if not earlier. Car keeps pulling all the way. Im hoping for 220rwkw @ 1.2bar

ok people, here it is a HKS GTRS on a RB20 - 215rwkw using 18psi.

i have put the dyno graph in the Rb20 dyno results thread with all my mods...but here it is anyway:

gallery_1619_111_139978.jpg

The blue line is my old R34 GTT highflow turbo, was pretty laggy in comparison...now the difference in response is huge, i now have a 50% increase in power at 110kmh :whistling:

All comments are welcome!

A clear demonstration of the benefits of increasing area under the curve, even if the max figure is not greatly changed in percentage terms.

The thing that is prominent to me is the shape of curve difference between 90-120km/h. Gone from concave (ski jump) section, to convex (hump) section. It looks like a big indicator of response, possibly related to the size of the turbine housing (R34 vs HKS)?

The full load dyno curve might show the difference in power, but I get the impression that power is only a small portion of the story. Transient response is where it's at for me!! Proof is in the driving no doubt.

Looks like it was money well spent.

cheers

Dale

Just out of curiousity what causes the power to drop off after 5700 ish rpm, I thought being a bigger a/r then stock it would allow better flow up top. Or is this just more a characteristic of the head/cams etc?

Either way looks like a very nice upgrade over stock.

A clear demonstration of the benefits of increasing area under the curve, even if the max figure is not greatly changed in percentage terms.

The thing that is prominent to me is the shape of curve difference between 90-120km/h. Gone from concave (ski jump) section, to convex (hump) section. It looks like a big indicator of response, possibly related to the size of the turbine housing (R34 vs HKS)?

The full load dyno curve might show the difference in power, but I get the impression that power is only a small portion of the story. Transient response is where it's at for me!! Proof is in the driving no doubt.

Looks like it was money well spent.

cheers

Dale

Hey Dale,

your right, the difference is even more noticable when driving, I think full boost is reached about 4100rpm in 4th gear :O

the R34 housing is visibly bigger than the HKS exhaust housing. If the HKS exhaust housing is .64 then what is the R34 one?

In summary: Definitely money well spent :(

Rolls Posted Today, 08:54 PM

Just out of curiousity what causes the power to drop off after 5700 ish rpm, I thought being a bigger a/r then stock it would allow better flow up top. Or is this just more a characteristic of the head/cams etc?

Either way looks like a very nice upgrade over stock.

Hey dude, the rpm on the graph was not calibrated so don't go by that, the KM/h are accurate though. So power drops off more like 6400rpm, and i think thats because of the stock cams....maybe someone else can add to this....?

Just out of curiousity what causes the power to drop off after 5700 ish rpm, I thought being a bigger a/r then stock it would allow better flow up top. Or is this just more a characteristic of the head/cams etc?

Either way looks like a very nice upgrade over stock.

Could be a few things... I would measure manifold pressure before throwing cams etc at it.

Its not only the a/r but also the turbine wheel size that determines exhaust flow ability.

An example of this is the GT30r 1.06 and GT35r .82, the turbine maps both flow roughly the same.

Also.. regarding the power run.... Can I ask why the difference in correction between the two runs. 1.13 vs 2.71. None the less power is roughly the same down low so the different correction values clearly make bugger all difference.

the R34 housing is visibly bigger than the HKS exhaust housing. If the HKS exhaust housing is .64 then what is the R34 one?

The local turbo dude down here in Adelaide said he's checked a few out and they appear to be a .7 something.

He also mentioned there's no listing of them anywhere so unless he cuts one up its difficult to get an exact measurement. But he was certian they are a .7 something. :(

The R34 turbine housing is the same as the late model VG30 turbine housing.

Also.. regarding the power run.... Can I ask why the difference in correction between the two runs. 1.13 vs 2.71. None the less power is roughly the same down low so the different correction values clearly make bugger all difference.

hey cubes,

i have no idea about the correction values on this dyno, maybe because the ambient temperatures between the 2 runs were quite different it compensates for it? as you can see on the chart, that the old turbo run was done on the 3rd Feb so it was a while back...

Yer either way the off boost power reading is basically the same so nothing to worry about.. Thought I'd ask anyway incase you had some interesting info to share on the correction values. :(

But yes very nice... Now settle it in for a while then ....... 22 maybe squeeze 24psi in to her. :O

the guy from horsepower in a box told me the stock vg30 (R34) housing is around 0.70, so that would most likely explain the comin onto boost heaps later etc

yeah, that would confirm what cubes said, so that explains where most of the lag came from :(

ok people, here it is a HKS GTRS on a RB20 - 215rwkw using 18psi.

gallery_1619_111_139978.jpg

We have a winner. Thw GT-RS . Based on the fact that ppl typically say his dyno reads low, and a quick comparison is...

At 90km/h i have 72rwkws you have 65rwkws.

At 110km/h I have 150rwkws, you have 150rwkws :D

At 130km/h i have 210rwkws, you have 190rwkws.

At 150km/h i have 234rwkws you have 217rwkws.

At 170km/h i have 235rwkws you have 200rwkws.

So allowing for the fact that his dyno reads low, its looks like the GT-RS tracks about the same as 20G but with more down low....and about the same top end (we are running the same boost)

To me its making the same numbers as my setup without all the agro of manifold and gate...so its a bolt on winner :(

The only thing that seems to fly in the face of my results is the way the power falls away. Do you run cam gears? I will look at what mine are set to in the morning...lol oh, thats about now. Time to put down the scotch glass and go to bed ;)

Yep definately looks like this turbo is a winner, i've got half a power run on 18psi with my 56T GT2871/vg30 due to a blown headgasket and a dodgy dyno operator, but my power readings are very similar up to 130kph with the 2.4l and much bigger exhaust housing.

90kph i have 75rwkw

110kph i have 140rwkw

and 130kph where it was shut down i have 212rwkw

doesnt really look like its slowing down at all on my graph and with 15psi and a rb25 turbine housing before the HG went it made 230rwkw.

it will be interesting to see just how much the vg30 turbine housing and 56t comp wheel opens up the top end.

Edited by kwazza11
Yep definately looks like this turbo is a winner, i've got half a power run on 18psi with my 56T GT2871/vg30

it will be interesting to see just how much the vg30 turbine housing and 56t comp wheel opens up the top end.

I think you have got the difference in characteristics nailed:

top end flow, at the expense of low end/mid range. Depending on what you actually want the car to do, that ski jump mid range can make it tiresome, if exciting to drive.

I agree, it will be interesting to see the extent of the differences. Bear in mind the first upgrade Interloper was running shared the same spec VG30/R34 housing you want to use.

FWIW, I suspect the 56T cartridge is just a little too large for a responsive match to RB25, let alone an RB20. While the RB20/25 spec turbine housing would keep the results biased towards mid range, the larger A/R R34 unit wouldn't allow the assembly to respond quickly. Keen to see your results though.

cheers

Edited by Dale FZ1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, I started this repair and got as far as "fixing" the holes with some fibreglass. God all those years working on boats came back quickly. I decided I'd reach out to some rust guys just to see what they would say about it. I came across a guy about 40 mins away and went to see him. He said the windscreen needs to come out, that there might be some more bits around the windscreen and he'd quote them at the time. But his quote was $300 to remove and replace windscreen and $3k for the damage he can see. He said he could respray the roof for $1200 and the bonnet for another $800 (somebody has previously rattle canned it, its horrendous). This is $5300 + any small additional bits. It's a lot, I get that and the name of one of my fave youtube channels 'Not Economically Viable' comes to mind.  I'm not being financially rational, but I've taken him up on the quote. He's opening a new shop in November with more room, so we're waiting for that. I'll leave the currently missing headliner out until then. I'm looking forward to it being fixed and having the paint looking nice again (lots of clear coat issues on the roof too). / flame suit on.
    • Oh and some up-and-comings; New rear drivers wheel bearing. I'll do that this weekend while the diff is out. The car is already up and the d/c axles and missing exhaust will help with space. This is the last bearing for me to do and I've been dragging my feet on it. I also have some new EBC blue stuff pads for the car and some new brake fluid. I haven't ever flushed the fluid in this car and looking forward to it. I have 600 degree fluid to put in. Not exactly "race fluid" but better than the typical stuff I have been using.
    • A proper clutch/plate type mechanical diff with quite a lot of pre-load and high locking % is better for drifting. Much more consistent in its behaviour. A helical can be annoyingly vague and inconsistent in how it responds under the sorts of abuse found in drifting.
    • Some updates here. I pulled the entire interior out, minus some trim to respray the seats with Colourlock dye. It turned out really nice though I accidentally let the dog in the car after and she scratched up the front seat.  This is what it looked like before, the colour was just washing out everywhere but thankfully the leather was in good nic. Then after the respray   And after the bloody dog jumped in The headliner is out waiting to be retrimmed, but it will stay out now until Nov - see why below. I replaced the stereo/headunit with a period-styled Android headunit. I have no after pics, but I'll get some. This is because of the missing pixels. I tried to fix this twice with replacement ribbon cables but couldn't. Also the bluetooth interface I'd bought for this was crap. Then there's the rusty roof. Pics and info in this other thread. I have decided to get this repaired professionally, but I'll update that thread. This is why the headliner will stay out for now. I'll be getting the roof and bonnet resprayed at the same time the rust is fixed. I also had an interesting issue with my drivers door lock.  For a small period I was having issues getting any 12v power to the car - I mean *any*. It would have no dash lights, nothing. It happened while I was at the shops and I couldn't get in the car. So, we had 2 problems. The most pressing here is that I was locked out. I have only a single physical key hole on the car, the drivers door and no amount of turning would unlock the car. Surely it doesn't need power for this? The second issue is why am I losing all power periodically, The battery isn't dead, its almost like the battery isn't even there. Two issues that were surprisingly easy to fix. You fellow BMW over-engineering lovers will appreciate this. The lock in the door has 5 states; mechanical lock, electric lock, neutral, electric unlock, mechanical unlock achieved at -90 degrees, -45 degrees, 0 degrees, 45 degrees and 90 degrees. Although, the unlock is towards the front of the car, so opposite for LHD countries. Sticking the key in and turning 45 left or right is what is used 99% of the time. It activates the central locking etc. 90 degrees is for dead battery access and, obvs, only un/locks the one door. But because the mechanical lock is never used and is 27 years old, it seizes up. I was totally unable to turn the key far enough to get to the mechanical unlock (At the time of locking myself out, I didn't even know this was a thing). I eventually did it with some vicegrips and teflon spray.  I made a quick vid for other E39 peeps.   The battery issue is totally new to me also - It wasn't making sufficient contact between the post and the terminal. The terminal was bolted on tight, but the car wouldn't have power. After checking the battery with my multimeter I accidentally contacted the terminal and the battery post and the car got power. The battery was only a few years old and in good condition. I cleaned the post and the terminal with a wire brush, bolted it back on tight and never had the issue again. I'm still surprised that despite having solid contact it didn't work. Also, the car was getting Warragamba sized pools of water in the back when it rained. My initial concern was another rust problem. But when I went out on Weds while it was raining and while I had no headliner in I could see a steady stream of water coming through the roof mounted aerial. As this aerial is for the (now removed) car phone I pulled it out and whacked a blanking grommet in the hole. It seems fine now. I'm thinking I might get the hole permanently filled when the rust is fixed. Moving forward and things in progress; The tailgate needs some attention. I have taken all the trim off to clean it all and address some small rust spots. I have partially done all of this but I'll finish it up hopefully this weekend. As all the trim are now entirely devoid of trim clips I have bought a heap of strong velcro and I'm hoping it does a good enough job as any of this trim in good condition is super expensive and usually in Europe as we dont have many of the wagons here. Suspension and brakes!!! This is exciting. In the front; New control arms New sway bar links New lower Eibach springs (the only modification I'm planning on this car) M Sport shocks (these came with the car and will replace the longer shocks in the car) New top mounts Used 540i calipers (stock brakes suck!) New 540i disks and pads (22x296 mm for 528 and 30x334 mm for 540i) New front wheel bearings (thank all that is holy for bolt on bearings!) Annnnd in the back; New control arms New sway bar links Adjustable air suspension arms (fool the car into what the current height is so the self levelling suspension can match the new front ride height) New ball joints I'll also be doing a brake fluid flush while I'm in there. I'm planning on switching the car over to the 16's that came with it so I can clean up and respray the M Sport 17's. They've lost a lot of colour over the years and have some gutter rash. None of this will start until the E90 is back.
    • You mean you will regret it for drifting duties? I don't quite follow.
×
×
  • Create New...