Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.nissanperformancemag.com/october02/skyline/

Hey guys,

i stumbled across an old article about a r32 GTR that supposodely runs 11.5 down the quater with the following modifications

Standard Garrett T28 Turbos

HKS Cam Gears

Trust Airinx Filter Kit

Custom Bleed Valve

Standard Dump Pipes

Trust MX Front Pipes (75mm into single 80mm)

Click for Full Image Straight through Cat Converter

HKS Hiper Cat Back Exhaust

Exxedy Single Plate Three Puck Clutch

producing a Best of 240rwkw

Is it just me or does this list of mods and power output seem like it wouldnt be enough to crack a mid 11?

Just asking out of interest...

Daniel

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127411-11-second-gtr/
Share on other sites

I knew this car well as it belonged to a fellow FangArtist (HiRisk).

Absolute animal of a car for the minor mods it had.

To put it plainly, Shaun drove it like he stole it in those runs. This included rev limiter launches, flat shifting and doing everything humanly possible to pull the fastest possible time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127411-11-second-gtr/#findComment-2353961
Share on other sites

As Leewah said ............. the car made 253rwkw on Racepace dyno ............... which one of the 1st cars at Racepace to make over 250rwkw with stock turbos. When the car was raced 1/4 mile it had no rear spoiler, spare wheel or anything in the boot. Shaun also would switch the car to rwd mode for a big burnout on old semi-comp tyres. It was great car and owner knew how to drive it hard, the car visited 9000 rpm a few times. :laugh: "Hirisk" always knew how to put on a good show :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127411-11-second-gtr/#findComment-2354230
Share on other sites

Car was in perfect condition when he sold it.

It just goes to show that you can absolutely thrash the hell outta a car but as long as it's properly maintained, there really shouldn't be any issues with it.

Those were the good ol days when we could cruise/fang where we liked and nobody asked any questions. Nowadays, you'd be nuts to go out and do half of what we used to do.

FangArtists FTW!!!

Hey cheers for the responses guys ... im suprised to see that a couple of you guys actually know him. He must have thrashed that car hard did it need a rebuild by the time he was finished with it?
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127411-11-second-gtr/#findComment-2356238
Share on other sites

Thats about the quickest time ive seen for stock turbo's....

Ive heard of a few NZ boys cracking mid 11s with stock turbo's, anything under 11.99sec is very good IMO.

Ive seen a R33 GTR with hi-flowed stockies make 280RWKW and run 11.70 @ 117MPH. I thought that was pretty impressive.

I also know of a R32GTR with R34 N1's that ran 11.20....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127411-11-second-gtr/#findComment-2357247
Share on other sites

shudup :wave:

It was my 3rd run of 4 and first time at the drags. I'd never even practiced launching before :)

dial in limiter, drop clutch, hang on = fast :wave:

There is also a 32R thats dipped into the 10's with R34 N1's, although not street fuels :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127411-11-second-gtr/#findComment-2357956
Share on other sites

As Leeway and RPMZ have already mentioned, this was HiRisk's car.

The car did do that time with listed mods but driven very hard/well with semi comp rear tyres.

Those were the good ol days when we could cruise/fang where we liked and nobody asked any questions. Nowadays, you'd be nuts to go out and do half of what we used to do.

FangArtists FTW!!!

The good ol days....never to return...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127411-11-second-gtr/#findComment-2358308
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...