Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks guys. Hadn't considered injectors; I guess max is pretty similar for R33/R34 (I think it's about 370cc's).

I will ask about the intake, whether it will take the 90 degree elbow off the standard turbo or whether something will have to be adapted. Also asking them about actuator (ie. does it come with one? what pressure?), oil & water lines (because if it costs me another $200 then it's suddenly not worth it) and whether it will fit under the stanadard heatshield, and *does it have the threads to accept the standard heatshield* because I don't really want to run without a heatshield. Oh, and if the dump is the same flange (I think it is - says T3 though and I thought RB's were T4).

Will let you know what I hear...

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks guys. Hadn't considered injectors; I guess max is pretty similar for R33/R34 (I think it's about 370cc's).

I will ask about the intake, whether it will take the 90 degree elbow off the standard turbo or whether something will have to be adapted. Also asking them about actuator (ie. does it come with one? what pressure?), oil & water lines (because if it costs me another $200 then it's suddenly not worth it) and whether it will fit under the stanadard heatshield, and *does it have the threads to accept the standard heatshield* because I don't really want to run without a heatshield. Oh, and if the dump is the same flange (I think it is - says T3 though and I thought RB's were T4).

Will let you know what I hear...

Well, I spoke to Morrie at hpinabox about the 2871R for RB25 today. Unfortunately it's not a completely straight-forward swap; there is most of the usual fiddling required...

- water outlet is M14 (Garett); stock fitting is M18 (Nissan) - needs a reducer, easy if you can find one

- oil return needs 'filing out'? Not exactly sure what that means, I think he meant the return pipe fitting needed enlarging... but it can apparently be made to fit the stock return easily

- inlet may need a reducer, depending on inlet size selected (and he couldn't remember off the top of his head what the stock size of inlet pip is)

- Morrie recommended fairly strongly that oil line should be replaced with the turbo anyway, to prevent the old one clogging (perhaps braided lines are less susceptible to this than the solid copper ones)

apart from those hurdles, it does at least have the standard exhaust inlet (T3) and will mount to the exhaust manifold OK, and has the standard Nissan dump connection (6-bolt). The actuator is included, and is set to 14PSI.

I didn't even get to asking whether the exhaust housing had threaded bolt holes to accept the factory turbo heatshield; I am guessing that it doesn't?

So yeah I would suggest that if these modifications are within your capabilities (& patience/time constraints), that this would be a pretty cost-effective upgrade... but for me I think it is going to have to be the GCG, as I just can't see myself messing about with a turbo more than replacing the turbo & oil line.

Edited by DaveB

hi dave

the HKS GT-RS aka (T3 version HKSGT2871) comes with all new oil and water lines and bolts up exactly to the factory inlet and dump. the turbo would work better than the HPIAB version ie prob more top end and no decrease in response but would cost a little more as the bits are assembled and have R&D factored in.

i reckon you are bolting the right turbo on if you go with something capable of around 420-450hp (flywheel) ie GCG, HKS GT-RS etc

the GCG should work out to be the best value due to the "true" bolt-on nature of the turbo.

good luck with it you won't be disappointed.

sounds like for ease of fitment the GCG is the way to go, and sell your turbo for a few hundred.

grab a custom oil line anyway, braided of course. Got mine made at Pirtek for around $60.

standard water line should be a.o.k. but you could replace both at once.....

Yeah seems it just doesn't get more bolt-on than the GCG; opened my eyes to how much it can cost just making a turbo fit :D

re the oil line; I did think of Pirtek. For that sort of price I'll do it.

bit confused re. selling my turbo... doesn't GCG take your turbo as a trade-in?

Edited by DaveB
Yeah seems it just doesn't get more bolt-on than the GCG; opened my eyes to how much it can cost just making a turbo fit :D

re the oil line; I did think of Pirtek. For that sort of price I'll do it.

bit confused re. selling my turbo... doesn't GCG take your turbo as a trade-in?

They actually rebuild yours. In my case i bought one off a SAU member in Sydney and am getting that highflowed as i didn't want to be without mine while it goes from Auckland to Sydney and back.

Dave, Id suggest buying a blown turbo (r32, r33 or r34/vg30 turbo) for $100, get that done by gcg, and sell your r34 turbo (worth $450 as its a large rear housing, bigger than r32 and r33 turbo's)

an r32 gcg highflow (Sydneykid uses one) has no lag, better than stock I hear, good power for around 240rwkw

an r33 gcg highflow is slightly lagier than stock, neither here nor there, but great power for around 250rwkw

an r34/vg30 highflow is bigger again, more lag than stock (use a good ebc to set the gain, etc), but massive power up around 270rwkw

Id be selling your turbo for as much as possible ($500 is a decent sale price, delivered with oil line, lol), and spending $200 on a blown skyline turbo and the pirtek oil line

depends if you want to muck around a little to maximise your savings

best of luck (thats what I did with Slide, gave him a blown R32 and blown R33 turbo, and had the R33 one sent back to me, sold my turbo, all up change over cost no more than $600)

Dave, Id suggest buying a blown turbo (r32, r33 or r34/vg30 turbo) for $100, get that done by gcg, and sell your r34 turbo (worth $450 as its a large rear housing, bigger than r32 and r33 turbo's)

an r32 gcg highflow (Sydneykid uses one) has no lag, better than stock I hear, good power for around 240rwkw

an r33 gcg highflow is slightly lagier than stock, neither here nor there, but great power for around 250rwkw

an r34/vg30 highflow is bigger again, more lag than stock (use a good ebc to set the gain, etc), but massive power up around 270rwkw

Id be selling your turbo for as much as possible ($500 is a decent sale price, delivered with oil line, lol), and spending $200 on a blown skyline turbo and the pirtek oil line

depends if you want to muck around a little to maximise your savings

best of luck (thats what I did with Slide, gave him a blown R32 and blown R33 turbo, and had the R33 one sent back to me, sold my turbo, all up change over cost no more than $600)

Ah, I get you now... hadn't realised that there was that much difference in lag either. 240rwkw still sounds pretty good (I don't think that will 'limit' me); that's not as bad as I thought then for a '32 turbo. Looks like any second-hand turbo will do pretty much, but I'll be aiming for a '33.

Not sure what my '34 turbo is worth as it is whistling a bit; probably rubbing? Does that count as 'blown' lol?

Thanks Tangles. cool sig btw - changes daily lol!?

dave i would be paying the deposit and once your turbo if off inspecting it then with the following options:

1: forwarding your one if it is knackered,

or if it is ok

2. sourcing a blown one on the forum for $100ish and sending that one.

ps. i wouldn't be buying your turbo at this point based on what you have said about its condition unless it was for $100 to send it off to be hi-flowed.

Edited by wolverine
dave i would be paying the deposit and once your turbo if off inspecting it then with the following options:

1: forwarding your one if it is knackered,

or if it is ok

2. sourcing a blown one on the forum for $100ish and sending that one.

ps. i wouldn't be buying your turbo at this point based on what you have said about its condition unless it was for $100 to send it off to be hi-flowed.

I looked into the deposit situation with an Adelaide-based company that GCG suggested, who were going to charge me $100-200 too much anyway; their advice was that GCG don't accept deposits anymore, something about not receiving the right turbos back??? I would've thought "simple, don't refund the deposit!" but I don't know...

re: the turbo condition... it whines, and when I remove the inlet pipe I can feel a tiny amount of play longitudinally and laterally in the inlet shaft. My guess is ~1mm but that is an absolute *guess* since my fingers aren't micrometers (darn :huh:). But it has been like it is for as long as I've had the car (about 6 months & 20,000Ks), and nothing has changed. So it can be used I guess... I just wasn't comfortable with using it with the IEBC install I am about to do; I always planned to upgrade to a GCG in the future but I didn't plan an order of things... that has changed. Plus there has always been a bit of oil in the inlet pipes (pre-turbo) and leaking out of the J-pip on the inlet manifold side, so I thought it best to repair it now. If it's only worth $100-150, and going from the suggested laginess of the '34 housing as compared to the '33 housing, then I might sell it off if and when I can get a cheap blown '33 turbo, as I would prefer the extra response over the extra ~20kw.

Thanks

DaveB

i don't think the R34 will be noticeably laggier to be honest but the logistics of taking your turbo off and waiting for the turnaround might be an issue hence a blown R33 makes a lot of sense.

the hp difference at best is usually between 5-15kw at the top end depending on who has tried the different housings.

have you called GCG and ask if they will accept a deposit just in case they will.

just a thought, is the whine due to a manifold gasket leak? has this been checked because you may have a pristine R34 turbo which will be worth selling whole if this is the case.

when the turbo comes off it may be worth removing the manifold and replacing the studs as they usually snap over time anyway. more money but it might be worth asking the mechanic. there should be signs of a gasket leak if they inspect it.

thanks yeah I will try calling GCG; the dealer they gave me I think was inflating the price a bit 'cause he was asking $100 more than ATS (who didn't recommend the GCG hi-flow in preference to their GT30 rebuild lol).

When I got the car back from compliance it had this whine, so I checked the forums and pulled the turbo and found a cracked gasket between exhaust manifold and turbo. I thought "yay I've found the problem and it only cost me ~$50" but unfortunately the whine didn't go away.

I have an ex manifold gasket, studs and locknuts on order, I will replace the studs. Hopefully I can also secure a 2nd-hand manifold too because knowing my luck, that will be cracked between 3 & 4. Anyone know if there is a difference in manifolds between RB20 - RB25?

I spoke to the workshop when they did my 100,000K service and they wanted an extra $500 on top of the service to replace studs, more if any of them broke.

When I pull the manifold I will check for leaks. I just hope I'm not gonna need a stud extractor kit because it's not gonna be easy to get half a stud out of a turbo head, I'm sure...

dave, get a quote from Boostwerks to fit the gcg turbo, to do the exhaust studs, and to tune

talk to shaun and say big brendan sent you

ask him if he's got a blown r33 turbo on hand ~

dave, get a quote from Boostwerks to fit the gcg turbo, to do the exhaust studs, and to tune

talk to shaun and say big brendan sent you

ask him if he's got a blown r33 turbo on hand ~

cheers Tangles. actually that workshop was Boostwerks; they're about 20 minutes away. I figured I'd supply the labour content of the stud replacement and save ~$500. I didn't name-drop though... wonder what'd be the difference in price. unfortunately car is undriveable atm. I should know before next week whether I have been successful; turbo off for the second time. Now if I could just get the damn bolts on the dump undone...

I call Boostwerks from time to time for quotes on this and that; I will probably get them to tune the beast when the new turbo's on and fit an FPR & maybe a fuel pump (or else I'll fit the pump) after I have the turbo, exhaust and DFR/SITC/IEBC sorted.

noice davb

can always ask them to get the apprentice to do the work to save a little coin

shaun looks after me with quality of work and pricing, best Ive come across, damned honest as well. which is a big thing for me

Yes have had no problems in that department. I usually get Shaun on the phone and he's pretty helpful; said they could do a custom exhaust sounds like they do a fair bit in-house. The tune they did for the service seems pretty good; made 130rwkw completely stock. I had some trouble with the gearbox though; I'm hoping this has nothing to do with tuning on a rwd dyno, I'm pretty sure that if you pull the front driveshaft though it can't hurt it... but still doesn't sound ideal (there's been a LOT of discussion about this!)

Edited by DaveB

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...