Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i was seriously thinking of supercharging my n/a... i got quotes and everything... then pulled out...

cost to buy a supercharger around 1.5k

cost to make manifold to adapt sc to engine 1.8k (including labor)

cost to make up an rb30de engine 5k (excluding labor)

cost to buy a GTR (another 10k)

so i figgered i'd rather spend the money on a GTR

the easiest supercharger to bolt on is the Toyota 1GZE SC. Its made for a 2.5L straight 6 (or was that 2.0L) the only thing you have to do is get a custom manifold fabricated. Smack on an GTR intercooler and a cold air intake and you've got a 50% power increase.

Plus you get that SC whine when you take off, and instant boost... no lag.

Turbo's are good for highend, but for lowend boost SC kill em.

The oldschool sc's were inefficient but if u can afford the 3-4k get an eaton or vortex supercharger and you'll put so much distance between you and a GTSt off the line it wouldn't be funny.

Or maybe I'll jus get a custom RB30DE engine made up, apparently that gets you around 160rwkw.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12761-turbo-conversions/#findComment-247084
Share on other sites

theoretically a supercharger is healthier for your engine than a turbo charger, as there's a linear induction of air, ie. the harder your engine works, the more air is pumped into it.

Turbo's work exponentially... (hence why they're good for good top end stuff) and don't really work in unison with the engine, there's less stress at lower revs and more stress at higher revs.

Performance improvemnet you're looking at between 30%-50% improvement with about 50% guranteed if you used cold air induction and an intercooler. You won't need that unless you plan to run at around 8psi and higher.

While you're figures won't look too crash hot on the dyno sheet in rwkw, if you map it against a turbo, you'll easily notice that you're putting down more torque and kw's earlier on the run than at the top. Which basically translates to the turbo car seeing your tail lights till you hit about 120km/h at which time you should see the turbo start to cath up.

SC = instant boost, which for a street racer is just as good as owning a GTR for a good takeoff.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12761-turbo-conversions/#findComment-247576
Share on other sites

intercooler would be the same as on a turbo system. In fact some supercharger systems, look jus like a turbo system, cept they have a belt and no exahust inlet.

lol well i was seriously considering gettin a supercharged r32, but then i figgered for that much money i could just as easily buy a GTR... mmm GTR. Plus a supercharger on a pissy 2.0L isn't gonna go far, it'd chop GTSt's but just barely and sumtimes not.

HKS makes this thing called the "Twin charger" which is a supercharger/turbocharger setup for believe it or not... honda 1.8L engines.

I also came across one when i used to have my CA18DET 180sx, got chopped hardcore by this suzuki swit or sumfin (can't rememba model) but he got me by about 1 carlength, and when we pulled up at maccas in thornbury, he popped his bonnet and reveald a custome supercharger/turbocharger setup.

The HKS one is apparently controlled by a computer, whereas the suzuki was controlled mechanically by valves or sumfin.

They both go hard, but the ends don't justify the cost.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12761-turbo-conversions/#findComment-247818
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...