Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the way the guy who had the suzuki explained it to me, they let the supercharger go from 0 revs and the turbo as well... the turbo spooled twice as fast because the supercharger created more exhaust pressure. Once the pressure built up and the turbo charger was about to start working in its optimal range the supercharger would cut off to prevent over induction. When the pressure from the turbocharger drops down to a certain level the supercharger starts again.

Its funkyshite but it worked hella mad... it managed to chop my 1.8L with the T67

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

refering to engine mods such as conversions, Turboing or superchaging or what ever. Also i have heard mix rumors about turboing a GTS Sklyine 2.5L is it good or bad and if you did turbo it could you then keep up with the GTST and will it mess your engine up.

Guest neoGT-25

well with 5 grand... i would make it a beast of a nat-asp :P (Insurence stops me from turbo)

i would make it powerfull enough to give some GTS-t's a good run for there money! :P

meh but seriously... im defently going to buy a kakimoto hyper 2000 premium N1 single exhaust sytem :D $1005 from purfectrun.com.au (I think its the one Demon Dave has on his R34)

KAKIMOTO EXHAUST PIC

Pipe diameter - 70mm

Tail pipe diameter - 115mm

and best of all... they make them for the R34 25GT :D LOL

meh... byes all :burnout:

im not a fan of the angled exhaust, thats why for my turbo engine i opted for a hks super dragger

now u might think "yeah its pretty big" but if you've only seen it in pictures before, once u see it in real life MY GOD! ITS HUGE! THE BARREL IS MASSIVE! TIP IS 5"! I CAN BLOODY LIVE IN THERE!

remember as always i still have some n/a parts for sale if u want them :P

oh...yeah :P

ummmm

probebly wouldnt be a good upgrade for ur car as they are 33 parts not 34 (u barsted i hate you grrr) but i have gearbox, breaks and rotors (maybe dunno yet might be sold :() lsd diff...stuff...err...i wonder if i should sell the old exhaust? anyway, exhaust is 2.5" mandrel whatever

er...i really should advertise all these in for sale section...but then again im not saying any prices..yet..but yeah :D

Hi

We just this last weekend swapped the converted engine out for a 25det.

Big thanks to DamqikGTST and Bigfella for the huge effort

We swapped the gearbox also (they are very different)

$3k i payed for the lot. noone really knows how strong the NA boxes are for sure. some say they are the same as the 20det box which dont have any problems with decent power.

your wiring loom can stay as its identical. you will need a 25det ecu though.

this is a much cheaper option than trying to turbo your existing motor. it was only viable for me coz i sourced the parts cheap and already had a controllable ecu.

my car now running standard ecu/boost is pulling smoother/harder than my conversion did.

things we HAD to change:

front half of tailshaft (the end that goes into the det gearbox is much heftier than the na one)

the speed sensor between the two gearboxes are different. (still havent fixed this yet

the clutch slave cylinder is different (need the det one or make up a custom bracket like old Bob did for us :P )

All of these above problems would be avoided if you retained the NA gearbox

plus...

you have to keep the original NA engine mounts (discovered this the hard way)

we swapped the fuel pump also as they are different and not worth taking a chance on.

ask any questions now if you want while its still fresh in the head. :D

i would recommend this over a conversion now given the end results and relatively cheap too. dont worry about the brakes they are fine unless you plan on takin it to the track often.

cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...