Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Umm ReeceR,

I could provide a link for you but this depends on which import broker or company you are using.

However, from the amount of time i have spent researching all the cars for my import i have found they vary quite alot from auction yard to auction yard and again to the final sale of the car. From my understading anything about Auction Grade 3.5 on average is going to be a decent car with a few niggly problems. I have imported an r33 with a grade of 4 and it is quite clean indeed.

Just make sure u see the underbelly of the car before u buy. Salt on roads in japan = rust. >_<

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/128255-car-grades/#findComment-2370062
Share on other sites

I am currently looking at my options of importing. But before go into it any further, I want to understand how cars are graded. I was looking over jspec's site, and I noticed most of their cars have a 3.5-4 grading. I have notcied in threads across the forum people comment on anothers car " is that a 4.5 grade?".

I am looking for a clean car. I'd prefer to hand over the extra cash and have peace of mind knowing that it's clean, and realiable. I was just hoping for some more information, like how the cars are downgraded from 4 to 3.5 for example. Thanks for the information though, I didn't know it could vary from dealer to dealer.

Any links at all would be handy though!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/128255-car-grades/#findComment-2370101
Share on other sites

Alot of cars that get downgraded from 4 to 3.5 is because of the Km's on the clock...more often than not it is when it has breached 100k's +

Auction Grade 4 with J-Spec will ensure you a very nice car indeed. Speak with Craig and he will look after you man, the last thing he wants for his customers is a bad car and a shitfight. He will tell the truth straight up.

>_<

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/128255-car-grades/#findComment-2370192
Share on other sites

j-spec dont grade the cars. so you cant really say "a grade 4 with j-spec will be a nice car". The grading system is used by japanese auction houses and as such only applies to cars sold at auction. The criteria does vary a little from house to house but basically the same. the thing that does vary is the accuracy of the gradings given.

Here is a guide ripped from amayama. Personally I've never seen an S mark, or 6 mark. needless to say most cars you will be looking at would be 4.5A at best.

S

Best of possible evaluations. New car or not older than 12 months, with a run up to 10,000km, in excellent condition, almost corresponds to a new one. No repairs or other works required.

6

Car less than 36 months of age, in excellent condition not requiring any repairs and other works. Run from 15,000 to 30,000km, tires with clear protector pattern, the engine operates ideally.

5

Car age has no distinct limits but in very good general condition with a run less than 60,000km. Body has minor, almost unnoticeable breakdowns and dents. Neither interior nor body requires repairs. The engine works excellently. After a minimum repair or even after a thorough interior clean-up the car deserves mark.

4.5

The car, like in mark "5", can be of any age but in a very good condition. Can have several small scratches, rust spots and almost unnoticeable surface damages to the body. May get mark "5" after a minor cosmetic repair

4

A car of any age but in a very good condition. Number of scratches and surface damages may be a bit more than for mark "4.5", and a more serious repair is required to remove them. The interior is not in a very good condition.

3.5

A car of any age but in a very good condition. There are more visible scratches and/or minor surface damages of body or the run is greater than that of cars with mark 4. Body repair is required; there are paint chips, the paint looks faded. The interior is in a bad condition. Sometimes a service book can be available with the maintenance history including repairs or replacement of certain parts (brakes, box joint, tires etc.).

3

A car of any age in a satisfactory condition, with visible scratches or surface breakdowns of the body. Faded paint on the body, the interior is in a very poor condition. Usually, a service book is available with maintenance history including repairs and spare parts replacement.

2

A car of any age, general condition is poor. It has big damages and requires partial or full repairs. Such cars are usually priced very cheap.

1

The car has serious damages ("bloat", rust, results of an accident) or tuned with standard parts replacement (different turbine, AT replacement with MT, etc.)

0, R or A

A car of any age after an accident, usually repaired by manufacturer at the cost if insurers. When selling, repairs are described. It can be a bumper replacement or a smaller repair. In other parts the car might be in a very good condition, but the prices for such cars are very low.

R1, R-A

Combination of marks R and 1 (or R and A) - either a car that was in a major accident and restored after with interference in the body framework or a modernized vehicle with non-standard parts (the latter usually refers to so called "sports" models, which were tuned-up).

***

Damaged and not restored car, very old vehicle or a vehicle with a serious defect in the engine (car in not in running order).

Besides, auction experts can appreciate interior and exterior separately using the following grades:

Evaluation

Exterior

Interior

A Breakdowns or scratches 2-3cm in length. Small dents in 2-3 locations. The paint is even. Interior needs no repair at all or requires minor repairs. Barely visible breakdowns (like seat abrasion) in not more than 2-3 locations.

B Body has scratches 5 to 20cm in length, minor dents of golf ball size. The paint is uneven in some places (visible runs). Rusted wipers, cracks in windows. Small damages like abrasions or holes in the seats. Salon can be easily cleaned, low need of repairs.

C Multiple dents on the body, scratches 20-40 cm in length. 2-3 dents of the size of a fist. Uneven paint, faded color. Minor repair is required; the salon is very dirty, abrasions and holes in the seats.

D Multiple major scratches and big dents. Body is subject to corrosion, repairs required. Various multiple damages in the salon, repairs required. Dashboard and other upholstery locations were changed. Too difficult to clean the interior.

E Body requires full repainting and restoration. Severe corrosion in some places. Dashboard requires replacement; the salon is very dirty and smelling badly. Major repair is required.

Optimal price/quality relationship is for cars with marks 3, 3.5, 4, aged 3, 5 or 7 years (the cars of this age are usually selling at auctions).

Bad marks given by auction experts may have various reasons. For example, a big run decreases the mark. The marks meaning that the car was repaired may mean anything: that the car was in an accident, that it underwent a minor repair, a major repair, a good repair or a bad repair. Sometimes, due to differences between evaluation systems, an automobile that received mark 0 at one auction may receive mark 3.5 at another.

Attention! The mark is given only on the basis of an outside inspection, mainly body and salon. Explicit problems with the engine or suspension are specified in notes to the auction sheet, but no special check is done on the engine, transmission and the undercarriage. Therefore, when selecting a car you should be guided by the run as well – the less the run, the less probability of technical problems and repairs needed. It should also be remembered that evaluation is a personalistic thing and you should not rely on it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/128255-car-grades/#findComment-2372019
Share on other sites

j-spec dont grade the cars. so you cant really say "a grade 4 with j-spec will be a nice car". The grading system is used by japanese auction houses and as such only applies to cars sold at auction. The criteria does vary a little from house to house but basically the same. the thing that does vary is the accuracy of the gradings given.

Here is a guide ripped from amayama. Personally I've never seen an S mark, or 6 mark. needless to say most cars you will be looking at would be 4.5A at best.

2006 - 2000cc

Chassis Type Odometer Colour Trans History Grade

CT9W 0km black Auto Transmission S

Air Condition Options

Air conditioner Aluminium Wheel / PowerSteering / PowerWindow

Start Price Status

2,390,000YEN Before auction

theres are grade S for ya,there is a few around :cheers:

post-7472-1154354538.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/128255-car-grades/#findComment-2372153
Share on other sites

:P

thanks, I had never seen it used at any of the auctions/cars I watch. seen a few grade 5s. but I've never really looked at cars newer than 2001 so it's no surprise I dont see the grade 6/S cars.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/128255-car-grades/#findComment-2373449
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...