Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

defari

Mine came up invalid to. (using V3.5)

Whats the model (Under VIN 18 chars, Some "-"'s) VIN's can be "Side steped and verified" with FAST

I suspect the 2249 may be the prob . minez close at 130310, Maybe they don't go that high??

th_P1010015.jpgth_P1010011.jpg

apologies for the shite pics

left pic reads ECR33-132249

right pic reads

E-ECR33

ECR33-132249

engine RB25DET 2498

th_P1010015.jpgth_P1010011.jpg

apologies for the shite pics

left pic reads ECR33-132249

right pic reads

E-ECR33

ECR33-132249

engine RB25DET 2498

that vin reads ECR-152249 to me

my fast gives a production date of 04/98 but thats it doesnt give any other details

need that GG>>??>>VDA___A of the blue plate

ECR33-014444

I got a feeling my car is a dodgy piece of shit...

**Edit**

Not sure about the rest of the details so i'll put them all down as they are

Blue plate Left to right, Up to down as they are on the plate.

Something. E-ECR33

Chassis No. ECR33-014444

Model. GGKBRTFR33EDA---D-

Paint 1N3

Engine Rb25DE

Something else. FS5W71C RC43

Green Plate (Compliance)

Nissan KT Skyline R33 2DR 1993.

ViN 6T91MPTECPYABG067

Any ideas about the 'KT'?

Also if anyone is immature like me please take note that my Vin has '6T9' haha yay

lol

Edited by Projectile
Also if anyone is immature like me please take note that my Vin has '6T9' haha yay

lol

hahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahaha

hahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahah

ahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahh

ahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahh

ahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahh

ahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahaha

hahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahah

ahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahaha

hhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha

hhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahaha

hhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahaha

hahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahah

ahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahaha

hahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaha

hahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhaha

hahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhaha

hahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahah

ahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahaha

hahahhahahahhahahahhaha :)

just double checked it

its definitely ecr-132249

the gg part reads

GGKBRTFR33VDA----A

March 1997

R33 GTST Type M

Manual

Color field is empty as i believe there is something wrong with your vin.

post-31217-1261481701_thumb.jpg

ECR33-014444

I got a feeling my car is a dodgy piece of shit...

**Edit**

Not sure about the rest of the details so i'll put them all down as they are

Blue plate Left to right, Up to down as they are on the plate.

Something. E-ECR33

Chassis No. ECR33-014444

Model. GGKBRTFR33EDA---D-

Paint 1N3

Engine Rb25DE

Something else. FS5W71C RC43

Green Plate (Compliance)

Nissan KT Skyline R33 2DR 1993.

ViN 6T91MPTECPYABG067

Any ideas about the 'KT'?

Also if anyone is immature like me please take note that my Vin has '6T9' haha yay

lol

R33 GTS/S

Non Turbo RB25

Manual

Couldn't get a colour code i think its because its a non turbo... same as the guy a couple of posts above the vin no. won't recognise had to use model number.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...