Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In that case, you may well still have the auto diff which means lower top speed but quicker acceleration. (like mine) :woot:

Need to try find a couple of R33 brochures I have and put on my magical japanese head for translating some of these questions. :/

Miguelone may be onto something...

Can anyone else break the code???

Edited by Not a Pulsar

can someone do BNR34006208 + show optional extras

and can anyone tell me what the little x's mean in the model code GGJPRWY34Zxxxxx-x

The first x after the Z is not a D, which i haven't seen before on a r34 model code.

Thanks in advance

can someone do BNR34006208 + show optional extras

and can anyone tell me what the little x's mean in the model code GGJPRWY34Zxxxxx-x

The first x after the Z is not a D, which i haven't seen before on a r34 model code.

Thanks in advance

vwxwys.png

Can't help with decoding R34 model codes :/, had a quick look on the net and couldn't find any info unlike with 32's & 33's.

Edit: found something

15yr0m.png

The character after the Z is the destination, As far as I know the only place outside of Japan 34GTR's were sold was the UK and not very many. Could your R have come from the UK?

thanks mate.

I was looking through the workshop manual (thats where that model variation image is from) when i decided to check my model code and that extra Z caught my eye.

It could have come from the UK - anythings possible - i also think a few got sold in NZ too

i'll check out the uk site and see what i can come up with.

mmm could be that. i know the r33 had a cold district specification, so it makes sense that the r34 had one. I don't think i have heated mirrors though

Regardless, the car's in pretty good condition if it came from a snow region.

post-78856-0-17899800-1348211497_thumb.jpg

Thx mate not sure about the model code and what it means RNR32GASLMDB but it says engine RB20DT but it is a DET does that mean orig it wasn't tubo and was fitted later?

What does 4K and the HI . 4WD mean? Prod M/Y 9007 does that mean build date July 1990?

I really do appreciate you taking the time to look it up for me, thx heaps.

fastformyskyline.jpg

Edited by Aljo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...