Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

without engine management or any ability to the tune car its pointles really. i would recommend just selling the guage and moving on with things.

that aside if you really must get one then you need to get the sensor. bosch have them as to do ngk and most other car electronics stockists. the sensor will be around the 400 mark ish and it could be more for the controller unit. ie: i dont think you can connect it directly to the af guage. and if u do get youll need to either tap a new bung in the exhaust dump pipe to mount it. if you replace the stock one with it, the factory 02 feedback wont work, so fuel economy will suck the wang, some controllers may have a narrow conversion which u could run to the stock ecu.

This is a old post but ,

Re: [oz-diy-wb] Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

michael_spiegle wrote:

>

> I was searching through the archives for infomation on the topic.

> I've heard that the Innovate Motorsports LM-1 is "much faster and more

> accurate" according to a couple people. I have used an Innovate box ...

Mike,

The "much faster and more accurate" statement applies to the LM-1 vs

most other wideband units EXCEPT the Tech Edge WBo2 range ...

Just so we could speak from an informed position, we "bit the bullet"

and finally got an LM-1 in November. We haven't actually had a lot of

time to look at it, but I'll make some general observations about

wideband meters first.

We HAVE seen "other" wideband products using LSU sensors and NTK

sensors. I hesitate to mention names (only from a legal perspective,

but I have made some comments that are in this list's archives). Some

of these wideband products, although nicely packaged and presented,

are absolute and total rubbish. The LM-1 is NOT rubbish and it does

work pretty much as advertised. It's packaged reasonably well, though

people say it's a bit large. Klaus is pricing it aggressively and it

seems to be selling well with all the advertising he pays for. At the

moment Tech Edge has taken a low key approach to selling and has

relied on word of mouth advertising.

Now for some comparisons with our unit - as we have a few different

models now, I'll mention the aspects that are common to all our rev 2

WBo2 units:

1. LM-1 uses a 10 bit DAC for it's linear output, Tech Edge use a 12

bit DAC. This is 4 times the resolution. Interestingly, both the LM1

and 2B0 use the Atmel AVR processor (Mega16).

2. LM-1 does not use the calibration resistor that comes with every

LSU sensor - therefore it MUST be calibrated each time a sensor is

swapped. Tech Edge correctly uses the calibration component in the LSU

sensors, and changing sensors (of the same type) does not require

free-air calibration to maintain a fairly good accuracy.

3. LM-1's in-built AFR display is hard to read.

4. Tech Edge has always had extra logging capability built into the

base unit.

5. Having a big calibrate button on the LM-1 invites people to

free-calibrate - this can result in inaccuracies unless the sensor

really is in free-air.

And, there are some things that the LM-1 does quite well. It has a

larger internal (on-board) logging memory, and it has the integrated

display which is handy for showing error messages. It's also field

upgradeable like our unit. In operation it has an aggressive heater

control algorithm and it provide a %o2 reading which we've never

thought was much use until last week when a potentially large

industrial user asked us to provide a linear %o2 output mapping for

WBlin (I will be providing this facility very soon via the next rev of

the CONF program).

Lastly, there are some "big" brand name wideband products that have

been around for quite a while (no need to mention names). I think some

of them, although they work reasonably well, are not good value for

money, and it would be good for someone, with the facilities, to do

some revealing back-to-back testing (no point asking me to do it -

who'd believe me ;-). Just for the record, we have a couple of ETAS

LA-4 units we use for comparison against our own units.

Summing up ...

> Does anyone have good information on 2B0 vs LM-1 in terms of performance?

I think it boils down to a purchasing decision between a good apple,

and a good orange, and trying to steer clear of the very tempting,

flashy, well advertised, but potentially expensive and not

particularly good performing, and poor value for money, bad lemons.

The final word ...

We've not been sitting on our hands since we developed the first 2A0

unit and then improved it with the 2B0 unit. We have come up with some

recent improvements that will result in some new products and

improvements to the existing range. But, 2A1 and 2B1 won't be out any

time soon, but we will have updates for some of our products in 2005.

To us, the technology and the results are more important than a flashy

go-fast look.

Peter.

te.

Fri Feb 4, 2005 4:16 am

Show Message Option

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

View Source

Use Fixed Width Font

Unwrap Lines

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Gargano <peter@...>

a1227ecm

Offline

Send Email

Forward Message #8155 of 10360 < Prev | Next >

Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

I was searching through the archives for infomation on the topic. I've heard that the Innovate Motorsports LM-1 is "much faster and more accurate" according to... michael_spiegle

Feb 4, 2005

12:40 am

Re: Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

michael_spiegle wrote: 8< 8< 8< ... Our units aren't open-source in the traditional sense (the firmware, in particular, is closed source and contains... Adam

adam_rx7sv

Feb 4, 2005

12:57 am

Re: Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

... 2B0 ... firmware, in particular, is ... try to make the hardware ... information available on the ... face of the earth ... a pretty good ... Hmm... oh... michael_spiegle

Feb 4, 2005

2:51 am

Re: Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

... Mike, The "much faster and more accurate" statement applies to the LM-1 vs most other wideband units EXCEPT the Tech Edge WBo2 range ... Just so we could... Peter Gargano

a1227ecm

Feb 4, 2005

4:13 am

Re: Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

This is perfect!! Exactly what I wanted to hear. Thanks for an excellent explanation. ... box ... ... performance?... michael_spiegle

Feb 11, 2005

6:35 pm

< Prev Topic | Next Topic >

Message # Search: Advanced

YAHOO! SPONSOR RESULTS

Automotive Service Equipment - Garage equipment supply offers a full line of automotive repair equipment at affordable prices - free shipping, online shopping.

www.gesusa.com

Automotive Service Equipment - Automotive Service Equipment is a nationwide distributor of automotive equipment. Find the perfect products to enhance your repair shops efficiency and help you save money.

www.asedeals.com

NorthernTool.com: Automotive Equipment - Shop Northern Tool for discount prices on over 15,000 products.

www.northerntool.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright © 2006 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy - Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, it's getting like that, my daughter is coming over on Thursday to help me remove the bonnet so I can install the Carbuilders underbonnet stuff,  I might get her to give me a hand and remove the hardtop, maybe, because on really hot days the detachable hardtop helps the aircon keep the interior cool, the heat just punches straight through to rag top I also don't have enough hair for the "wind in the hair" experience, so there is that....LOL
    • Could be falling edge/rising edge is set wrong. Are you getting sync errors?
    • On BMWs what I do because I'm more confident that I can't instantly crush the pinch welds and do thousands of USD in chassis damage is use a set of rubber jacking pads designed to protect the chassis/plastic adapter and raise a corner of the car, place the aforementioned 2x12 inch wooden planks under a tire, drop the car, then this normally gives me enough clearance to get to the front central jack point. If you don't need it to be a ramp it only needs to be 1-1.5 feet long. On my R33 I do not trust the pinch welds to tolerate any of this so I drive up on the ramps. Before then when I had to get a new floor jack that no longer cleared the front lip I removed it to get enough clearance to put the jack under it. Once you're on the ramps once you simply never let the car down to the ground. It lives on the ramps or on jack stands.
    • Nah. You need 2x taps for anything that you cannot pass the tap all the way through. And even then, there's a point in response to the above which I will come back to. The 2x taps are 1x tapered for starting, and 1x plug tap for working to the bottom of blind holes. That block's port is effectively a blind hole from the perspective of the tap. The tapered tap/tapered thread response. You don't ever leave a female hole tapered. They are supposed to be parallel, hence the wide section of a tapered tap being parallel, the existince of plug taps, etc. The male is tapered so that it will eventually get too fat for the female thread, and yes, there is some risk if the tapped length of the female hole doesn't offer enough threads, that it will not lock up very nicely. But you can always buzz off the extra length on the male thread, and the tape is very good at adding bulk to the joint.
    • Nice....looking forward to that update
×
×
  • Create New...