Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

oh, a valve body upgrade..

in that case DO A SEARCH as i have posted in 3 threads about it in the last 2 weeks...

im not looking for a valve body upgrade. im looking for a fully manualised auto which im pretty sure is called 'quickshift'.

pkblade is referring to a short shift kit which is in the manuals.

Hey SECUR1TY let us know how you go with Dynamic Racing Transmissions. Prices etc.

What have you got on your line atm? Power?

Do you have a transcooler yet?

Are you getting problems with your auto box?

will do.

191ish kw.

yes.

yes. the problem is close to being fixed (im buying a new TPS and seeing how i go).

with the valve body upgrade does the car shift gears as soon as you put it into 2nd from first etc?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130096-auto-quickshift/#findComment-2412581
Share on other sites

im not looking for a valve body upgrade. im looking for a fully manualised auto which im pretty sure is called 'quickshift'.

pkblade is referring to a short shift kit which is in the manuals.

Sorry wasnt too sure what you meant, havent heard that term before...'quickshift'.

If your planning to stick with the RE4RO1A, there are two main ways to go manualised auto/ clutchless manual/ semi-automatic or what ever you want to call it:

1) Manual valve body & sports shifter (optional); or

2) MV Auto's electronic shift controller, shift kit (optional but recommended) & sports shifter (optional).

I took the later path w/ the ever so popular B&M pro-ratchet shifter. Clicky to check out the range -> http://www.bmracing.com/index.php?id=produ...sid=2&cat=2

With either of the 2 options you can install stand alone computers (ie. Power FC, Motec etc) :rolleyes:.

Also, if you decide to get a B&M shifter, MV Auto's have the custom brackets for it to fit.

Edited by pkblade
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130096-auto-quickshift/#findComment-2412683
Share on other sites

thanks so much for that!

what $ figure am i looking at to go with either set up?

Dont remember what I was quoted for the full manual valve body but, you can try emailing KEAS for one http://www.keas.com.au/contact.htm

Here are some approx costs for the second set up:

MV Auto shift controller $260

B&M 4speed gated or ratchet shifters $200-400 (check out ebay)

RE401A selector brackets for shifter $50

Labour for the above is about $300

Also, your current shifter console surround will no longer fit so, a custom one will need to be fabricated.

+ Shift kit $350 (exchange).

You might find interesting to know according to Mike from MV Auto's a healthy RE4 trans w/ supporting mods is good for up to 300rwkw without touching the planetary gear set, whereas Paul from KEAS believes its only good for 240rwkw.

BTW how many km's has your trans done?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130096-auto-quickshift/#findComment-2413792
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...