Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

JMS+R33+drift.jpg

JMS+R33+drift+2.jpg

JMS+R33+drift+1.jpg

JMS+R33+drift+3.jpg

JMS+R33+drift+4.jpg

JMS+R33+drift+5.jpg

JMS+R33+drift+6.jpg

this is how its done,I would change the front bar but with plenty of dish it looks fat as f**k...what are they 10s, 12s??

though unfortunately i think alot of troublesome guard work was involved >_<

I'm not sure if I've posted in here. But here is some anyway. Some are old... some are new... most are average cos I can't take photos

16800418378785496741321.jpg

img2113yi.jpg

yeah it doesnt seem to sit as nice as your old wheels did, maybe its different in the flesh i dunno..

these photos is where it sits just right IMO anyway , not sure if the first pic is lower than the second

..If you wanted it to look more low just get different skirts..put your old wheels back and get an Explosive kit Blags..

Top pic is: 17x9.5 -2 front 18x.10.5 +15 rear

Second pic is: 17x9.5 +18 all round with 245/40

New rears are: 18x10.5 +-0

blags quest for the perfect fitment, you could write a thread about it..lol..

I dunno but im more of a tuck than a poke man so my opinion may be different to yours and others

I think rim should be close as possible to flush with guard, tyre size is determined by what will then fit under the guard without too much stretch. And stretch front and rear should be even..having a rear stretched more than the front looks unbalanced..and rather silly IMO..camber should also be close as possible to even front and rear..

in your case from a stance only view, I think the 17 fornt 18 rear worked really well and what it needed was a better bodykit to make it all work without the need for excessive lowering..

i havent been to stance nation for a while so maybe im outta touch :P

blags quest for the perfect fitment, you could write a thread about it..lol..

I dunno but im more of a tuck than a poke man so my opinion may be different to yours and others

I think rim should be close as possible to flush with guard, tyre size is determined by what will then fit under the guard without too much stretch. And stretch front and rear should be even..having a rear stretched more than the front looks unbalanced..and rather silly IMO..camber should also be close as possible to even front and rear..

in your case from a stance only view, I think the 17 fornt 18 rear worked really well and what it needed was a better bodykit to make it all work without the need for excessive lowering..

i havent been to stance nation for a while so maybe im outta touch :P

Yer I guess I could do a nice little write up haha.

It all depends on what you like. I was running xd9's about 2-3 years ago and ever since I continued to get more and more aggressive sizing and offsets. I went back to running 17's all round with sticky rubber because I am getting into a bit of track work.

17's front and 18's rear worked a treat... there was no way you would see a 33 as low as mine.

Going back to a less aggressive set up now and probably staying that way....

Stay tuned for more photos ;)

while on the tyre/ stance subject. im about to get some new tyres, currently running 235 /45 and if i run a 5mm slip it sits just right, would i be right in assuming i could go a 245/40 all round in the same tyre?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...