Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think its always been like this with the 8's.

My old VS 5ltr 5speed would get around 16l/100km's locally then on the open road a whopping 9.2L/100km's.

Yeah, I think so too man. I guess this is what they were designed for though, freeway cruising.

Yeah, I think so too man. I guess this is what they were designed for though, freeway cruising.

Pre VZ and late VY was the end of lean cruise due to EPA wanting to reduce NOx levels (NOx emmssions go up when there is a lean burn condition) which when combined with photochemical smog causes ozone depleting gases. THis is where they got there good economy from as under crusie conditions the engine was barely running. A typical early model VY GENIII would command an AFR in lean cruise of about 17-18:1. This is how they got there good highway figures.

That said I have no idea how they get those highway figures now. Holden is probably just lying and or enable the test car with lean cruise. Have seen them do dodgier stuff to get around emmissions.

but i saw one of the holdens up close the other day. and from the front it really does look like a lexus, and from the back like a BA falcon.

holden says it was deisgned from the ground up, starting 6 years ago, so it is a 6 year old car. and since it probably looked like a 6 year old car holden just stole the design of current cars to make it look like a new car.

The Commodore range looks good as, the SS especially. It might be the pics i've been looking at of the HSV but the taillights look out of place, seems as though the only changed them for the sake of being different to the commodores.

Those pictures released by HSV just don’t capture the magnificent lines of the car. I love the new HSV design, looks great. It has a sleek, powerful, European and strangely Australian design. I love the new LED lights – even Euro models don’t have LED signal lights. Good job HSV.

With the new MRC suspension this new HSV should out handle most cars on the road. Again good job HSV for introducing a very advanced suspension setup - Only the fifth (?) vehicle to introduce MRC in the world (along with Ferrari’s top of the line model, Audi TT, Corvette and top of the line Cadillacs).

The back actually looks more like a fancied up Audi.

_F4U0522.jpg

_F4U0187-2.jpg

_F4U0447.jpg

_F4U0408.jpg

And I just love the side profile

_F4U0243-2.jpg

Huge ass brakes (remember these are 20 inch rims).

_F4U0119.jpg

_F4U0128.jpg

From Eastonchang and LS1.com.au, visit for more pics.

don't worry holden never does anything for the first time, always catch up. Euro models, at least BMW have had LED for 2-3 years. brake/signals, everything.

Holden will always be behind, i'm not knocking the car... but that's just the way it is.

Car looks mean, lights look weird..

now what do ppl think of a SS/HSV (don't know if they're the same) spoiler on a R34? :O

Pre VZ and late VY was the end of lean cruise due to EPA wanting to reduce NOx levels (NOx emmssions go up when there is a lean burn condition) which when combined with photochemical smog causes ozone depleting gases. THis is where they got there good economy from as under crusie conditions the engine was barely running. A typical early model VY GENIII would command an AFR in lean cruise of about 17-18:1. This is how they got there good highway figures.

That said I have no idea how they get those highway figures now. Holden is probably just lying and or enable the test car with lean cruise. Have seen them do dodgier stuff to get around emmissions.

I believe this to be so as prior to the ecu and cams the old VS on the open road would get around 11L/100km's.

The back of that HSV is absolutely revolting. They musta been drugged when they designed it.

Hahahahah.........its an Astra on the roids...needs to be drugged tested. Major amount of work had to be done on the VE platform to conform with the V8 Supercar blueprint....BAN VE :(

Hahahahah.........its an Astra on the roids...needs to be drugged tested. Major amount of work had to be done on the VE platform to conform with the V8 Supercar blueprint....BAN VE :)

they should have called it the VD model ..it looks like the clap to me...46%of it made in thailand and korea.. hope of some of worst VD around :(

newer spec, improved engy... im liking it... decent suspension you say, read i must.... if they have finaly goten away from the truck rolers, il even consider this over my next car, as so far the choice was going to be an evo.... hmmm... except this will have towing capacity, something to toke my traily's with aye.... hmmmmmm going to look into it.... 2 tonnes though..... not a selling point..... good what 400-600 kilos haevy than evo... apples an oranges yea... but a decent sedan is what i need

haha my next post was gonna be about the laillights being from an MX-5. theyve really raided mazda for design cues...

poor effort. Youd think before they start pressing panels, that theyd have a look at their design and think 'hhmmm. i dunno. it looks like a mazda. maybe we should try originality, just to see how it goes...'

  • 1 month later...
don`t forget to ask about the 23 components allready recalled ...only been released a week and allready recalls :laugh:

Holden recalls new Commodores

7:48 AM October 19

Holden has issued a national recall of its new Commodore after the discovery of potential fuel problems.

The recall affects VE and WM series models made in July and August this year.

The Federal Government's consumer recalls' website says in extreme cases, the vehicle may develop a fuel leak.

The website says a fuel hose that connects with the main fuel line may have been manufactured incorrectly.

Holden spokeswoman Maya Donevska says concerned customers should contact their dealer.

Ms Donevska says a potential problem with the fuel hose arose during production.

"At one of our supplier plants, during the fuel hose assembly process, there is a chance that a misalignment may occur, if that misalignment may occur, there is a chance that the fuel hose might get a small tear in it," she said.

"Having said that, there's been no reported incidents in the field, it's something that we've picked internally during routine checks."

Source: ABC

More Finance news

WHAT A DOG !!!! a billion dollars for this POS..

the first in long line of recalls to come no doubt :woot:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
×
×
  • Create New...