Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

nissan never released any stock figures at the wheels, only at the flywheel

based on what i have seen on SAU from stock R32's including my own, i would say:

auto - 100rwkw

manual - 110rwkw

gains from just a cat-back and nothing else? probably about 10-15rwkw...

  • Like 1

Yeah, they prodused 158kw at the flywheel i think it was, theres a formula to give an approx of what that would be at the wheels, but the above figures seem pretty accurate i would say.

If you are interested in a power increase, i would seriously consider a turbo back exhast with high flowed cat as opposed to a cat back, which is not that likely to give much of a performance increase.

you will definately see a power increase with a cat-back.. as i said 10-15rwkw

obviously you will see an even biger increase if you do the whole exhaust (dump/front pipe, cat, cat-back) - more like 20-25rwkw..

but everyone has a budget do whatever fits into that budget!

but those figures i quoted were pretty accurate i think for a stock gtst and i mean out of the factory style...

thanks thirtytwo... that figure is kW at the flywheel

as the power makes its way though the drivetrain, energy in the form of movement (kinetic energy) is lost as heat and noise. Thus by the time is makes it to the tyres to move the car forward, much of the energy has been lost.

that is what is measured by a dynanometer.. power at the wheels... which is 100rwkw auto and 110rwkw manual

My R32 GTS-T has just a 3 inch HKS cat back and pod filter and returned 177.6rwhp. I'm sure you could expect similar results with the Trust 3 inch cat back and similar intake. See link for my original thread (including dyno printout).

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=1611204

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...