Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here's a quick rundown of the day:

NismoR34 - R34 GTT with pod, cat back and boost

182.0 rwkw @ 7100 rpm

Jet-33 - R33 GTStApexi S-AFC, Blitz Access ECU, Blitz BOV, 3" zorst, POD, Turbosmart boost controller @ 14psi peak holds 11 psi

179.9 rwkw @ 6900 rpm

RUS - R33 GTSt Mods ???

183.2 rwkw @ 6800 rpm

TUFR33

MUCK

riggaP

Adzmax - R33 GTSt Mods ??

164.9 rwkw @ 6700 rpm

INASNT - 400rwkw Supra, apprently INASNT was 'having us on' and couldn't deliver :D

DJ_L3ThAL - R33 GTSt, SAFCII, Boost, leaking BOV (now fixed), possible faulty coil pack also

162.4 rwkw @ 7000 rpm

Jamezilla

Adz - My old R32, unfortunately he slept in :P

Matty - R32 GTSt, who also 'slept in'

R31Nismoid - Unfortunately when fitting a boost controller I discovered the R31 had a faulty fuel pump which will be replaced shortly.... expect some big numbers soon

Al - R33 GTST, Wolf 3D ECU, 12 psi boost

172.4 rwkw @ 6400 rpm

R32PWR - Mental R32 GTSt RB27 with twin HKS 2835R's, unfortunately during "testing" on the previous thursday night full boost in second managed to snap the RHS axle... But beware....

Ronin 09

RedlineGTR

Meggala - R32 GTST, Pod, Zorst, 14 psi Boost, Dr_Drift ECU

148.0 rwkw @ 6800 rpm

Ben from BMT - 180SX, SR20, Dr_Drift ECU (not tuned yet), 17 psi boost peak holding 12 psi, FMIC, zorst, filter

155.3 rwkw @ 6000 rpm

Mutex - Stock as a Rock R34 GTT

161.1 rwkw @ 7000 rpm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/13156-dyno-results-29303/
Share on other sites

ooooooo i c.

1fitty! hmmmm.. damn it i want an extra 8rwkw!

can u ask benny it will be for stainless 3" dump and front pipe?

im thinking of not bothering with the cooler just yet and get these bits done first.

Thanks again Doc!

One thing has got me curious though: did the guys keep turning off the TCS after each restart of engine?

TCS always comes back on after ignition / engine shutdown!

Perhaps this explains why increased boost and also using your BV didnt make a difference?

I only turned off TCS the first time...

Originally posted by nismoR34

Thanks again Doc!

One thing has got me curious though: did the guys keep turning off the TCS after each restart of engine?

TCS always comes back on after ignition / engine shutdown!

Perhaps this explains why increased boost and also using your BV didnt make a difference?

I only turned off TCS the first time...

Don't really know actually?? I'm pretty sure they didn't turn it off after restart.... hmmmm that will have to be an experiment for my new dyno??

Sounds like a plan to me :(

What brand dyno is it? Locality [near Essendon or ?]?

I am pretty keen - though I am not expecting to get much more than 182 in current form... I will probably wait until after I have done some mods. Looking at finishing off exhaust soon.

It's a Dyno Logic, I've researched thoroughly and believe this is a much better product, and has many more features than the more common Dyno Dynamics. The new premesis will be in Heidelburg.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...