Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just wanna know what you's think about a gt35 turbocharger or gt40

my mate recommended it for the rb20

anyone know anything about em or fitted one to the rb20 before?

5pi by 6800rpm

I have been fitting the GT2876R turbos to the RB20's on the stock manifold. They are a good turbo with great response and output....mind you, it is a hell fight to fit it all unless you have done it all before.

Just wanna know what you's think about a gt35 turbocharger or gt40

my mate recommended it for the rb20

anyone know anything about em or fitted one to the rb20 before?

You would barely get any boost at all in first gear.

ok thanks dont worry bout that last post i looked it up

But...

im going to start a new post And i want everyone with the rb20 too

post up what turbo they are running when it hits full boost and any info about how much mods they

have cause im not getting very far this way i need results

Type of Turbo = Psi with ect ect ect = Power in rwkw

Cheers

(i also think we should do it with the rb25 for the r33 lovers)

ok im after some comfirmation on this turbo charger before i buy it

it would be nice to hear of someone else that has it on there RB20

i wanna know the specs on or what yous think about the gt2876r 0.64

when it will hit boost and type of power output

elite has already mentioned what it should put out ect but i wanna make sure these figures

are spot on before i buy so dont go copy what he has said in his posts

thanks

  • 2 weeks later...

Just wondering why everyone says the gt30r or gt35r turbo would be too laggy...Here in the states there are 2.0 4g63T with gt35r's making 600+hp sure full(30psi) boost dosen't until 5000-5500 but your power band won't stop until 8000rpm?? Are you guys saying that a 4g63T 2.0lt 4 banger can spool turbos quicker than the 2.0 rb20det??? I would think that gt30r with a .63 a/r would be the most perfect turbo for a mild to high power rb20...mild being 300hp(15-18psi...high being 500hp...yes you heard me 500hp!!!25-30psi :woot:

4g63 has less cyls and consequently has bigger bore and stroke to make up the same displacement, 85x88 (borexstroke) where as the rb20 is 78x70

from this 25% longer stroke, i think it would be safe to assume the exhaust would be pushed out around 25% faster (given same head, all the other crap)

they also run an 8.8:1 compression ratio compared to the rb20s 8.5:1, not much difference, but would help a bit.

generally a 2L 4 will spool a turbo better than a 2L 6.

Edited by salad

I know its late in the thread, but if i was you, i would go with a Sliding Performance RB25 Highflow...

Reason, good response, good bang for buck(under a grand exhange price), reliable and with a retune, injectors and the supporting mods you will see around 220rwkwish Guranteed!

I know this because im going to get that exact turbo very soon!

money is not an issue for me and high flows dont last too long especially the way i drive

does anyone know anthing at all about this gt 2876r .64

still havent got my turbs yet.......................

money is not an issue for me and high flows dont last too long especially the way i drive

does anyone know anthing at all about this gt 2876r .64

still havent got my turbs yet.......................

If you are after something a little more 'bolt-on' friendly, the GT30R will not be too laggy. Good for around 500hp on an RB20 but even with the 0.64 rear housing....don't expect 20psi til around 4000-4500. I would recommend cams and head porting to assist but at least cams if you are on a budget. Price is $1750 for one of these.

If you are after something a little more 'bolt-on' friendly, the GT30R will not be too laggy. Good for around 500hp on an RB20 but even with the 0.64 rear housing....don't expect 20psi til around 4000-4500. I would recommend cams and head porting to assist but at least cams if you are on a budget. Price is $1750 for one of these.

Finally, some reasurance:) Here is a 30r on ebay, for a pretty good deal, you will have to modify your downpipe though...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/NEW-GARRETT...sspagenameZWDVW

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Garrett-GT3...sspagenameZWDVW

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/GARRETT-GT-...sspagenameZWD1V

Edited by z31 rb20

Honestly my opinon only - the GT2876R are dogs . I would sooner throw money away on those ridiculous "turbo zets" and use them for paper weights . Trying to force a 53.8mm turbine to drive a 76mm big trim compressor is just plain dumb . Look them up on the turbobygarrett website - they clearly state not for a performance application , I can't see any use for them in anything . Buy at your own risk - its your money/choise .

Fours and sixes , can't really compare . As has been said the 2L six has ~ 330cc pots vs the 2L fours ~ 497cc pots . You are burning a greater mass of air and fuel in the four and venting a greater quantity of exhaust gas per cylinder - this makes a huge difference to low speed engine torque and the ability to excite large turbos .

The RB20 has had many birthdays since it last saw any factory level development where the 4G63 has been a constant evolution that is still ongoing . They have come a long way with mechanicals and controls since the early VR4's .

If there had been a 4 cylinder version of the RB26/30 it would have solved many arguments .

Cheers A .

Honestly my opinon only - the GT2876R are dogs . I would sooner throw money away on those ridiculous "turbo zets" and use them for paper weights . Trying to force a 53.8mm turbine to drive a 76mm big trim compressor is just plain dumb . Look them up on the turbobygarrett website - they clearly state not for a performance application , I can't see any use for them in anything . Buy at your own risk - its your money/choise .

Fours and sixes , can't really compare . As has been said the 2L six has ~ 330cc pots vs the 2L fours ~ 497cc pots . You are burning a greater mass of air and fuel in the four and venting a greater quantity of exhaust gas per cylinder - this makes a huge difference to low speed engine torque and the ability to excite large turbos .

The RB20 has had many birthdays since it last saw any factory level development where the 4G63 has been a constant evolution that is still ongoing . They have come a long way with mechanicals and controls since the early VR4's .

If there had been a 4 cylinder version of the RB26/30 it would have solved many arguments .

Cheers A .

Even the early, 4g63's gets the job done...little has been done on the inside of the 4g63, all of the evolution has been in the head, and fuel system...I belive the rb20 could push the gt30r well, not many has done it so there litttle info....people have to understand that if you want bigger kw numbers then spool time will have to suffer a little. Dual BB turbo are making the lag pains painless!!!! And if the lag is a bit much than maybe we should look into gear ratios, maybe run a 4:11 rear end gears...All i know is the rb20 is built for top end, trying to make it a have low end power is against it's design, and small turbos will not do it justice.....I would love to feel 20-30 psi from a 30r on the 20..oh boy!!! I soon will start my z31 rb20det swap, and im planning on 300hp(225kw) so i might just slap on a rb25 turbo, or some sort of t3t4 hybrid...this is going to be a daily driver...my 88 starion is going to be the beast 2.6lt(g54b) sc61 t04s turbo(cold .70 a/r hot .68) MPI!!!

post-31796-1158807502.jpg

If you are after something a little more 'bolt-on' friendly, the GT30R will not be too laggy. Good for around 500hp on an RB20 but even with the 0.64 rear housing....don't expect 20psi til around 4000-4500. I would recommend cams and head porting to assist but at least cams if you are on a budget. Price is $1750 for one of these.

Are we sure that putting cams in an RB20 makes it more responsive? If so what sized cam was it?

Also, head work, what is meant by that? Are you talkign about the chambers, the ports, match porting, bigger CA valves???? Again, just like with NA cars if you can worsen air velocity and low rpm response with cams and headwork....how do you avoid makign the response worse?

Are we sure that putting cams in an RB20 makes it more responsive? If so what sized cam was it?

Also, head work, what is meant by that? Are you talkign about the chambers, the ports, match porting, bigger CA valves???? Again, just like with NA cars if you can worsen air velocity and low rpm response with cams and headwork....how do you avoid makign the response worse?

Roy,

if using the hydraulic lifters (lash type), i don't think you can go higher than 8.5mm lift, and duration up to 270 degrees in the PROCAM and 256 in the PONCAM, according to Tomei.

if running solids, you can go as high as 10.25mm , with but other mods will be required.

hhmmm, i have a mildly ported rb20 head with modified cams sitting at home, now i am tempted and then i can fit up the TD06-25G that's also sitting in my garage :/

Edited by RS500

Ok So you think the gt2876r 0.64 is no good any experince with it at all?

The other turbo i was having a look at is the HKS GTRS but im not too sure on the type of power output id get

but on the other hand how does it compare to lets say 2530 or 2540

is the gtrs good quality or should i just go for something like the 2530

i want something i can run big boost on are they all similar

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...