Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey peoples, long time reader first time poster.

I am about to imbark on the conversion fun of an RB25det VVT head onto my RB30ET. One of the questions that has had me buggered for awhile now is, i am still going to be using the standard r33 computer but does it have any sought of immobiliser built it in to that i can disable.

Also little things like the exhaust temp sensor, is there any way i can disable this.

Edited by VL 30 LT
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/132069-rb2530-combo-conversion/
Share on other sites

thanks mate, as this thread is probably very informing i dont really have the time to read threw 208 pages of info. all i want to know is does the standard r33 computer have an immobiliser built into it that can be disabled and does it have an exhaust temp sensor that can be disabled.

thanks anyways guys, the bloke i was suppose to be buying a complete RB25DET top end has now sold it to someone else. So i guess i wont be going ahead with the DOHC conversion at this point in time unless someone else has a complete topend they want to sell me.

It doesn't have an immobiliser built in you have to do anything with. If you want to put one on there are wires there you can use.

You don't need to hook up the temp as far as I know.

So.. in short you don't need to worry and don't have to hook anything up in those 2 regards.

thanks anyways guys, the bloke i was suppose to be buying a complete RB25DET top end has now sold it to someone else. So i guess i wont be going ahead with the DOHC conversion at this point in time unless someone else has a complete topend they want to sell me.

any half decent import wreckers can hook you up a 25 head, its not like they are rare or sumthin.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Like I said, "black magic" LOL In the end,  it is what it is, and hopefully, what this here knuckle head has done is an improvement and not a hindrance Not that I actually notice any negatives now, or that I will get any seat of the pants benefits when all is said and done, but best practice says I shouldn't be pulling intake air from the hot engine bay  Famous last words: I cannot see it being any worse than what it is at the moment 🤔
    • If the gases flowing in those two tracts had the same properties, you could maybe use such broscience. But the exhaust has a different composition, different normal density, different actual density (because of different normal density, and mostly because of the massively higher temperature), and different viscosity (again because of much higher temperature). Consequently, all of the fluid dynamics parameters that matter, that you calculate from these inputs, such as the Reynolds number, friction factors (for wall friction) and so on, are all incomparable.
    • And we shall have to presume that Canada is the same?
    • In the US almost everything is E10. It can't exceed 10% by much or fuel systems have trouble adapting. At the same time because MTBE, MMT, and TEL are all banned they need as much ethanol in it as possible to boost octane.
    • I was mostly jesting. In my experience (and probably only my experience) the R34 GTT physical airbox space is actually too small to flow the amount of power it wanted. By sealing the box, I made it so it could only be fed by the ducts themselves. So you can seal it up and get nice cold air which IS good, but at a certain crossover point: More Hot Air > Less Cold Air I don't think you're at this point. In my case merely ducting the hot air intake with a very focused set of ducts counteracts the fact it's in a V8 engine bay. More cold air obviously best. The solution looks great.
×
×
  • Create New...