Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am currently driving a 1998 Nissan Skyline R34 25GT in a Semi-Automatic. It should run around the 150kw mark and all I have is a K&N air filter. I am also currently on my red P's, first year which means that I can't have any modifications done to my car - not that I'm gonna follow.

Anyways, what mods can I install to boost up my car - which is also not too obvious to the boys in blue

Cheers.

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

id be interested in this as ill be in your exact situation very soon, im geting my license back after a speeing offense, so ye im on my red ps, im gonna buy a semi auto r34gt, ive got a mate who does performance nissan gearbox's, but im not sure if this would do much to a standard 25gt?.. anyways, how is the car? do they have enough power for every day use and a lil bit for sum added fun every so often ??

You can get a shift kit to make it a bit less sloppy on gear-change.

Decent exhaust, porting and cams...maybe something like the new e-manage ultimate to trim the fuel and increase timing and raise the rev limit.

hey 666dan wat do u reccon all that would cost champ? do you think a shift kit would make a noticeable difference to the standard tip tronic, and with all this any chance of keeping up with our turbo buddys?

The shift kit would definately help, used to have a 25GT and would have liked crisper shifts in it.

I'd say for cams, porting, e-manage + tune you'd be looking at $3500 at the very most, some good shopping around will drop that price for sure. While you've got the head off the car, would maybe be worth having it decked and put the compression up a notch. You'll only be able to use 98+ octane though.

An exhaust can vary greatly, my CES exhaust was $2K, but it is awesome :blink:

I think you may be competative with stock GTts for sure, you've got about 100kg weight advantage over them.

Get one of those SS Turbo kits that put the turbo under the car at the rear; the cops will never know where to look :blink:

I'd save the money for mods and wait till you get off your Ps then upgrade to a GTT :D

hey santic, u reccon it would be hard buying a stock 25gt-t and changing that turbo rocker cover?? lol cops prob wouldnt know the diff, how do u go around registing a turbo as a non turbo shifty styleS? btw no way i can wait 3 years, how much do those turbo kits cost u were talking about

One from SS Turbo (I think that's the name of their company) is about $10k :no:

Don't think they do it for Nissans; I've only ever seen their work on a Holden Commdore (single blower out back) and a BMW M3 (twin blower out back). Both cars were seen at the Auto Trade Fair a few months back.

Does anyone have a link for one of these shift kits? How does it work, a more aggressive/high revving gear shift programing with transmission cooler?

I wouldn't want a high stall on my auto since that would make fuel consumption go down the drain hole!

the shift kits just make them change gears quicker. they don't give you more power.

as for mods, get a set of extractors, and a full exhaust. that should give you noticable gains, but your car will be noisey. probably louder than a turbo, depending on how many mufflers are in the system. but it will sound sweet. then just something like a safc2 to control the fuel.

shift kit - gear changes are crisper/ quicker and the auto can still change gears by itself

manual valve body - everytime you need to change gears, you need to move the stick (it will not change by itself)

kool thanks sloazr33 , wat do u guys recomend ? shift kit or manual valve body ?

Well imo, your auto for a reason (to be lazy) if you want to change gears yourself, buy a manual or convert yours.

definately a better way to go, but if you awnt to keep the auto, then its obvious, you just want a shift kit

its really a personal prefrence... if the skyline gearboxes are anything like the infinity which im pretty sure they are... you dont actually modify the valve body to manualise it rather an extra control bypasses the operations of the auto computer... about 60 bucks from MV automatics.. but with out a shift kitted valve body the shifts are still slow and sluggish.. Depending on how far u go with the shift kit u can make autos chirp gears during shifts just like manuals...

you've already got a tiptronic by the sounds of it, so just go a "stage 2 shift kit" which simply firms up gear changes.. basicalyl makes gear changes instantaneous so it chirps between gears on full throttle... do a search for more info i have posted the results of when i did this

for "hidden" mods, i would suggest...

exhaust: extractors and cat, but with stock cat-back. if its loud, it will be obvious that its modifed

intake: new air filter and cold air intake

head: adjustable cam gears

computer: some kind of adjustable management. try the SAFC2 for a cheap option

this will take base power from about 110rwkw in stock form to maybe 125rwkw. don't expect much more without big $$$ being spent. unfortunately you don't see the gains that you get with a turbo car...

best of luck,

Warren

for "hidden" mods, i would suggest...

exhaust: extractors and cat, but with stock cat-back. if its loud, it will be obvious that its modifed

intake: new air filter and cold air intake

head: adjustable cam gears

I dissagree (with the exaust only) there is alot of restriction in stock exausts, its not just pipe size, also flow etc (stock mufflers now being old on alot of cars, and they were cheap and basic to begin with) you can give a car a sports exaust and still have it quiet, and still get the gains, alot of the time, the sound is jsut because people want it, because it makes the car sound powerfull.

If you go to an exaust shop and you say you want the car to sound stock, but have a high flowing system on it, they'l do it happily, it just requires some mufflers a bit bigger.

Say a large resonator and a large high flow muffler with no tip (i.e. ending in normal piping) it will just look like you have had your exaust replaced, due to age or some other problem etc (and after a few months you wont even notice its new) and it will be quiet as, infact you could have a happy medium, like a tiny bit of a note, very quiet, nothing to turn heads, but just a nice sound.

And as for Stock looking mods, pretty much ANYTHING internal, Like Raising compression (if your sticking with N/A) by shaving the head/block or changing pistions, porting and polishing, lightweight gear, a mild cam...

etc, as long as you keep the engine tidy, but stock looking (like no chrome shit etc) if the boys in blue ever ask you to pop the hood, and they see a stock looking engine staring back at them, they wont hasstle you.

Things like keeping an airbox (maybe a bigger better one off another car) if you change the intake piping, paint it black, not chrome, you can still run a K&N filter etc...

go the sleeper

mate i disagree completely..

not on what you are saying, because you are right and i know that its not goign to flow great

but for this particular guy who wants it to look stock not just sound stock. an aftermarket exhaust will look aftermarket. all you have to do is look under the car and hey presto there's teh exhaust! cops aren't bright and don't car that its quiet if it looks aftermarket

for that stealth look but trying to get some more power, stick with the stock cat-back.

after all, its an NA car and won't respond to exhaust mods like a turbocharged car

horse for courses, and for this particular application its got to be the way

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...