Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im curious to know if what ive read and been told is bullshit or not. A bloke with a r33 gtst with a rb26 in it with alot of work done reckons with two hks gtxxxx or something arather rated at 360hp each can make 544rwkws or 730hp on a simple and conservative 1.2bar. Assume it has all supporting mods, mild camshafts(done @ tighe cams), std valves, port n polish(course finish, not polished), std manifolds in & out, a fairly thick metal hg, assume cr 8:1, running pump bp 98, motec m800.

I admit my understanding on twin setups like those in gtrs im unfamiliar with but turbos are turbos regardless, to me that amount of power is not accurate. Can anyone explain it or explain their setups if similar and what power they make. Perhaps offer some explanation for it. Not only that but the car can do 1:14s around the national track @ QR and incase people dont know v8 supercars do 1:12-1:13's commonly with quickest time recorded a 1:10 by tander. Whether thats accurate or not i cant say, its only what ive heard.

Im annoyed a little bit that the guy bagged our setup and why his is so perfect is what i want to know cause i cant see it being soo good. This is a information seeking mission but also venting my annoyance.

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/136148-730rwhp-possible-with-twins-rb26/
Share on other sites

If you are referring to low mount turbos, then indeed you've been told rubbish and a simple check of the RB26 Turbo Upgrade thread stickied in this section would have answered your question.

I'm running the largest HKS-GTRS terbs (largest low mounts from HKS) on a fairly seriously built motor and can only achieve mid 500s rwhp.

See:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2137700

Cheers

Gav

Ive been through the 26 section before and seen the power figures...thats why i think its all bull. But i figured well just incase he has a heavier worked motor then say most others and thats why hes achieved that power or something out of the oridinary.

Gav what power are the GTRS rated at?

Obviously different dynos will give different power whether shootout mode or not and so on.

Gav what power are the GTRS rated at?

HKS rates them at 400PS each

Gav: What sort of boost were you running to produce ~550rwhp? Sounds like something is holding you back if thats the most you can squeeze out of them

Im curious to know if what ive read and been told is bullshit or not. A bloke with a r33 gtst with a rb26 in it with alot of work done reckons with two hks gtxxxx or something arather rated at 360hp each can make 544rwkws or 730hp on a simple and conservative 1.2bar. Assume it has all supporting mods, mild camshafts(done @ tighe cams), std valves, port n polish(course finish, not polished), std manifolds in & out, a fairly thick metal hg, assume cr 8:1, running pump bp 98, motec m800.

I admit my understanding on twin setups like those in gtrs im unfamiliar with but turbos are turbos regardless, to me that amount of power is not accurate. Can anyone explain it or explain their setups if similar and what power they make. Perhaps offer some explanation for it. Not only that but the car can do 1:14s around the national track @ QR and incase people dont know v8 supercars do 1:12-1:13's commonly with quickest time recorded a 1:10 by tander. Whether thats accurate or not i cant say, its only what ive heard.

Im annoyed a little bit that the guy bagged our setup and why his is so perfect is what i want to know cause i cant see it being soo good. This is a information seeking mission but also venting my annoyance.

Cheers.

Over 500rwkw on 1.2 bar? I highly doubt that :)

try another tuner gav and u might be suprised ;) with that setup and gtr-s and 28psi i'd expect more. :)

sell the gt rs turbos and go for a single HKS Z and u will need half the boost for the same power :)

Edited by CruiseLiner

no chance @ 1.2bar

thats all really :)

It could be possibly with the biggest trust offerings, but not pissy 360hp huffers.

dirtgarage made the power on race fuel dont forget, and around 370-380 on pulp which is the norm for 2530's...

IMO Gav, 2.8l + 28psi and every other nice bit of fruit... it doesnt equal 550rwhp unless something is severly holding you back

try another tuner gav and u might be suprised ;) with that setup and gtr-s and 28psi i'd expect more. :)

sell the gt rs turbos and go for a single HKS Z and u will need half the boost for the same power :)

No - the dyno numbers that I'm producing on the GT-RS terbs are about right compared with others.

I believe DirtGarages's numbers (which are much higher than I've seen others publish) weren't produced on pump fuel from memory (correct me if I'm wrong).

Agree that the single T04Z is indeed a nice bit of kit, but now that I'm set up with the low mounts I'll stay with them. Presently fitting longer duration exhaust cam which should extend the top end some without hopefully not losing too much low down. Very little experimenting with cam timing so far, so should be interesting with some more dyno time.

EDIT: posted at the same time as R31Nismoid regarding race fuel.

The terbs and fuel system are set up for mid 500s awhp, so I really don't feel like I'm being "held back". The extra good bits are really just for reliability and longevity.

What the dyno graph doesn't really convey is the very broad spread of torque available which is what I set out to achieve - the main use being track days and motokhanas.

Cheers

Gav

Edited by Gav

pnblight is making those numbers almost (530-540hp from memory) with 2560r turbos and 2.6L bottom end and it aint on 28psi i know that much. and thats on pump fuel too

dirt garage's rb26 was on race fuel yes.

are u running 28psi with pump fuel???

Edited by CruiseLiner
pnblight is making those numbers almost (530-540hp from memory) with 2560r turbos and 2.6L bottom end and it aint on 28psi i know that much. and thats on pump fuel too

dirt garage's rb26 was on race fuel yes.

are u running 28psi with pump fuel???

I've only tried pump fuel.

Unfortunately haven't had the opportunity to catch up with Pete (pnblight) and go for a spin yet - hope to early next year when I'm back.

Did drive Adrian's JUN 2.7L with 25/30s fitted. Much of a muchness in response although I did feel that I had a greater top end.

Simon's 2.6L with the Garrett TO4Z is just nuts. Suprisingly, Not much difference in response but just crazy top end response.

' date='27 Sep 2006, 07:58 AM' post='2531990']

doing dyno runs the last few days on a top secret car, big mods, and a t88-38k, 22 psi, 432rwkw. oh by the way, did anyone say lag ?

next step is to bottle it so the boost comes on quicker ! boo yah

Hardly surprising when the car is running a T88-38GK on a standard capacity RB26.

' date='27 Sep 2006, 07:58 AM' post='2531990']

doing dyno runs the last few days on a top secret car, big mods, and a t88-38k, 22 psi, 432rwkw. oh by the way, did anyone say lag ?

next step is to bottle it so the boost comes on quicker ! boo yah

that is very interesting but doesn't really have anything to do with this thread now does it? hardly ground breaking news. a T88 GK makes 400kw!!!!111

I think some of you other guys need to let go of your stranglehold on dyno numbers. every dyno is different. if Gav is happy with his power and build then why keep poking at it? i would say his engine build would be one of the more serious ones on here so i dont think it's a matter of him having skimped on it. I don't know of many other HKS 2.8 litre strokers running GT-RS turbos kicking around aus.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...