Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK...let me explain it again.

There were 4 different Turbo combinations that Garrett made.

The -7(N1),-9(SS) were close as far as Performance.these were the N1 and SS equivalents.

Both these Turbo's have a very similar housing size as Stock and are rated to be able to

support 300 and 320hp respectively.

The factory stock turbo's I recall were rated either to 260 or 280 each.But don't quote me on this.

Now the -5(GT2530) and -10(GT-RS) have bigger housing and are able to support 350 and 400hp respectively each.

In no way unless you want giant lag should you use -10.(GT-RS).......unless you have a built motor with high lift cams dialed in

buy a good tuner. Even then you will see power higher in to the rev range that makes driving around town stupid.

These are only good for drag and whiplash when they start to spool at 5000RPM. :P

Now most people here swear by the SS or N1...both of which are great for low power delivery and great therefore for street.

Responsive and a good package.......no mods needed slap them in and presto.....

OK......If you want some serious usable power mid to high range the -5's are good.

But I only suggest -5's if you continplate upgrading Computer,Cams,Dumps,Injectors at a latter stage

or if you are thinking it will be a work in progress.

The other option is to go 1 Single and be done with it...although this can be a lot more costly.

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2860-5's with dumps, injectors, afm upgrade, and pfc.. Making 350rwhp at the moment. Stock before, everything.

Even though my previous dyno run and the one after were done on different dynos with a slightly different settings used, When I plotted the old run over the new one the two runs start rising at almost the same road speed, with the -5's just walking away after max psi was reached.

On the road it doesn't feel much different in the low revs, but with a lot more urge in the mid, and without the umph slowing as much to revlimit (set at 7500rpm).

Hope my experiences help others.

James.

Here is the setup of my car R33 GTR:

Twin Garrett GT2860R-5

HKS Actuators

HKS twin 2.5inch exhaust (twin 2.5s from dump back)

Tomei Dumps

Tomei Poncams (260degree, 9.15 lift)

Top Secret Camgears

Apexi pod filters

SARD FPR

SARD 650cc Injectors

Walbro 341 fuel pump

Power FC D-Jetro

HKS EVC V5

Car goes in for a tune next Saturday. Once i get the figures, Ill let you know.

BlitzR33 and others, are you also adding your info to the RB26 aftermarket turbo sticky?

That keeps a summary of mods/power levels of RB26's in this section of the forum

...OK......If you want some serious usable power mid to high range the -5's are good.

But I only suggest -5's if you contemplate upgrading Computer,Cams,Dumps,Injectors at a latter stage

or if you are thinking it will be a work in progress....

Spot on TK. 2860-5's All done minus the cams...430hp atw. The response Vs Power debate has been visited many times on SAU. In the end you have to sacrifice one or the other to a degree. If you want both get a supercharger.

It sounds like your after the -7's/GT-SS's but you may want mo powa later on...it's addictive apparently. I think the best way to figure out what works for you is to get a ride in a line with the set up your after. If you have a tuner that you use, ask him if he could help set up a ride with a fellow customer or failing that talk to someone in the club.

Here is the setup of my car R33 GTR:

Twin Garrett GT2860R-5

HKS Actuators

HKS twin 2.5inch exhaust (twin 2.5s from dump back)

Tomei Dumps

Tomei Poncams (260degree, 9.15 lift)

Top Secret Camgears

Apexi pod filters

SARD FPR

SARD 650cc Injectors

Walbro 341 fuel pump

Power FC D-Jetro

HKS EVC V5

Car goes in for a tune next Saturday. Once i get the figures, Ill let you know.

Picked up my car from the Tuner this morning.

Car was tuned for mid-range power. At 14.9psi it was 261.4awkw & at 20psi it was 292.1awkw...

I'm very happy with my results and I'm sure I can get a few more horses out of it with a little more fine tuning.

post-1165-1224561253_thumb.jpg

Edited by Blitz_R33
Only 290rwkw from -5's ???

They should be up around 350rwkw @ 20psi.

Unless the turbos aren't -5's perhaps... Either way for the turbos you 'should' have, the power doesnt sit right at all

I know with those turbos I should be getting lots more power. I told the tuner to just tune it to mid-range power and not dyno-queen power. Plus with stock internals, I don't want to push much more power since I don't want anything to blow.

I'm sure down the track I'll be bored with 292KillerWasps and I'll tell the tuner to turn it into a dyno-queen...

Edited by Blitz_R33
^^^^ very nice power!

How does it feel on the street; much more laggy?

I haven't had a chance to drive it much..Just picked it up at 9:30 this morning, then drive it to work.. I did notice that boost kicks in just after 3000rpm so its virtually like stock turbos! Im still babying it in case something goes wrong :wacko:

I know with those turbos I should be getting lots more power. I told the tuner to just tune it to mid-range power and not dyno-queen power. Plus with stock internals, I don't want to push much more power since I don't want anything to blow.

I'm sure down the track I'll be bored with 292KillerWasps and I'll tell the tuner to turn it into a dyno-queen...

i'll try a bit clearer) that only 290rwkw @ 20psi. There is something wrong or not quite right.

Safe tune and a setup being 'down' easily 60rwkw are two different things IMO. A 'safer' tune you might expect 20rwkw or something.

Even a safe tune will net 330rwkw on a stock motor. Hell people make 380rwkw on them no worries on a proper motor and perfectly safe.

I just have a feeling that your tune would be 'lazy' with so little timing or something else too make such a low power output, that you would more than likely be better off lowering boost to say ~16psi and running 300rwkw by bringing the timing and whatever else up to match it.

Would make the car so different and much nicer to drive without really stressing anything at all as your running less boost to begin with :)

Same power with less boost would be much better than a lazy 20psi setup @ the same power level give

Your making less than GT-SS/-7's would on 20psi, and they are a smaller/more responsive turbo to boot on a 'safe' tune as well :wacko:

Do you have a graph with AFR's at all?

Thanks for the advice R31Nismoid. I didn't get a printout of the AFR graph.. I'll go and have a chat to my tuner this wkend...

I was reading this thread http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb....html&st=80 adn noticed that a few of the guys are getting the same figures I'm getting.

Here is a post from 700HP-GTR33 who has similar mods to me:

96' GTR33

Garrett 2860R-5(HKS 2530 Equivalents)

Hks Split dumps

Tune agent manifolds

Nismo oil pump

Nismo water pump

Nismo fuel pump

Nismo fuel regulator

700cc Sard injectors

Iritop sparks

Split-fire coils

Trust oil cooler,with relocation filter.

Cusco catch can

Tomei air intake with Pods

3"Cat, Custom 3" exhaust,3" Resinator ohmy.gif with 3" Xforce Hotdog

Apexi power fc

AVCR boost controller

ARC FMIC

HKS Cam gears

@ 4 Wheels

Max Power 260.3kW @7183RPM (1.3 Bar)

Max M.A.P 223.6kPa @7055RPM (1.3 Bar)

Future plans> Z32 AFMS, Tomei Poncams 260 Degree with 9.15 lift .

Fitted RB25 AFM's

Tomei Poncams

@ 4 Wheels

Max Power 274.7kw @ 6963 RPM (1.3 BAR)

Max Torque 924.8 Nm @ 4803 RPM

Max M.A.P. 230.4 kPa @ 4665 RPM

The Boost controller was not set up correctly the last tune....so reflecting the before tune curve.

and a20089:

96 GTR V-spec

Tuner

Croydon

Power 266.5 @ 18PSI on new "fuel efficent" tune (low reading dyno)

Power 265 @ 17.5-18 PSI on full fuel (Croydon dyno)

Power 244.1 @ 15PSI on full fuel (Croydon dyno)

Mods

K&N panel Airfilter

Full exhust with 5" CAT

Pair Garrett 2860-5 turbo's

Apexi Power FC

Blitz ID-3 boost controller

Jun Cam gears

Stainless dumps

Edited by Blitz_R33
I haven't had a chance to drive it much..Just picked it up at 9:30 this morning, then drive it to work.. I did notice that boost kicks in just after 3000rpm so its virtually like stock turbos! Im still babying it in case something goes wrong :wacko:

Ahh i see but still at 3000rpm; not too bad at all.

I am changing my turbos soon and think ill be going gt-ss as i wont be changing camshafts like you. I really like the stock turbo response but im a bit paranoid about the stockers going pop on me.

Plus labour will be cheaper as ill add some tomei dump pipes at the same time.

Please keep us updated when you have the chance to take it out on a nice open road; would love to read your 'impression'

well done mate!

Ahh i see but still at 3000rpm; not too bad at all.

I am changing my turbos soon and think ill be going gt-ss as i wont be changing camshafts like you. I really like the stock turbo response but im a bit paranoid about the stockers going pop on me.

Plus labour will be cheaper as ill add some tomei dump pipes at the same time.

Please keep us updated when you have the chance to take it out on a nice open road; would love to read your 'impression'

well done mate!

I know nothing about cars (I'm a IT guy), but for a cheap mod I would strongly recommend adding CamGears & Camshaft to your list. they are a cheap mod and you get great response & power. I had them in my car alongside the stock turbos and the response was amazing. With only the cam gear/shaft, exhaust, filter I was getting 215awKW.

If you do upgrade cam gear/shaft go and buy the Garret GT2860R-5 turbos as they are much cheaper then the HKS GT-SS turbos. Get them all fitted at once because its going to save you on labor costs. Camgears/shaft + Garret GT2860R-5 turbos + tomie dump pipes will still allow you to drive the car with a stock ECU.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...