Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

nothing stops the power its just like anything, once you start doing good numbers, you can design something that will suit the purpose better. As an example back in the 90's every hi-po vl was pushing 400rwkw from a 68mm ford throttle body. As another example at 10inches of water a 50mm round hole can flow 250cfm, a 65mm hole can flow 450cfm. Your intercooler will be a resriction well before a plenum or throttle body will; a good 300x600 core flows around 300cfm!!!

However this said once you are doing the numbers, it can be improved on, mainly the fact the standard item is so heavy on the middle cylinders in airflow.... I have not seen any strong evidence to this day that will suggest the standard plenum has a limit on how much power it will support....but as I mentioned you can always improve on things so if you have built the motor, got a top notch management system, big turbo and the right auxillary's then look at some plenum upgrades.. Probably a waste of time till then

Cheers

Edited by Fitzpatrick Speed Works

so how bad is the heat soak in the piping crossing the engine? Has anyone ever tested the standard piping route to see just how much it heats the intake charge ?

That and the lesser lag would motivate me to go for a front facing plenum.

Would the effects be negligable considering after a good bit of hot running I can still quite comfortably leave a hand on that intake piping just infront of the throttle.

This subject has been covered so many times. Sydneykid once laid out all the calculations of the speed of the air as it goes through you piping and the air is in the hot pipe for such a tiny amount of time that it doesn't have time to take on any of the heat.

For some reason I don't understand the length of the runners has an effect on torque, particularly, the longer the better for low down torque and I suppose the shorter the better up high. Can anyone confirm this?

There are engines, I think some ford 6's, that have variable length runners for this reason.

waste of money.

When you can make over 300rwkw on the stock one

why change it? Doesnt pose a restriction or hinder the car at all

standard reply once again aye

to you, yes its a waste of money

to others, no its not

some people actually like their engine bays to look good and like to have easier access to spark plugs, injectors, etc

im not going for over 300kw and im getting a front facing plenum made i think its the best mod i could make to my engine bay cause the stock one looke like absoloute shit

believe it or not some people are after a bit more than "bang for your buck" perfomance

Of course its a standard reply, funnny that i tested the standard item and proved it to work quite fine, as have many others

So i'll use my standard response as much as i like, i did the R&D with RPM, i'll use the results from a performance perspective.

Do your rocker covers you have nicely coated give a performance gain?

No, they just look good, and thats fine for you if thats what you want.

Same as the plenum.

You have money to burn, so your buying one for looks. Thats your choice.

Im not interested in looks, and im not made of money, and when performance beats rice in my version of paper, scrissors, rock... performance gets the focus.

Hence if the stock one does the job it gets the vote from me.

People appreciate information (generally) thats all im providing, is there an issue with that?

Also remember, most people on this forum are from a certain demographic. 18-24.

Not all have a fortune, so the majority wanna see bang for buck for thier 5-7k they have worked hard for.

Have you considered the fact that if you just change the position of the Throttle body you are risking blowing your engine, through it leaning out in Cylinder 6?

They're designed to be fed from the side and as such have all the airflow paths made to suit, ensuring that all cylinders get enough air..

If you just simply cut and weld the throttle body to to front you will lack are in some cylinders..

Doesn't more air = leaner and less air = richer?

so having less air at cylinder 6 would mean more fuel to air ratio.....

Using that example, there is much more air going into 3 and 4 on the stock plenum?

A standard plenum provides significantly more air to the cylinders 3 and 4 thus they will be more likely to run lean. In a front facing plenum design believe it or not number 6 will receive the most airflow even though it is furthest away it is the most inline with the incoming air, cylinders one and 2 for example must draw the air to change its incoming path whereas 6 get it shoved down its throat figuratively speeking. standard plenum modified to be front facing will be a lot more of performance disadvantage and riskier at over 300rwkw than a standard item.

Cheers

Have you considered the fact that if you just change the position of the Throttle body you are risking blowing your engine, through it leaning out in Cylinder 6?

They're designed to be fed from the side and as such have all the airflow paths made to suit, ensuring that all cylinders get enough air..

If you just simply cut and weld the throttle body to to front you will lack are in some cylinders..

Is that tru?

agreeing with Fitzies post about the cylinders...when my mate made up the custom plenum he was very particular with how cylinder 1 and 2 would get air flow, this is why alot of flow testing was done etc to make sure the cylinders were recieving almost equal ( negligable difference between all 6) air flow...

also with his post about the numbers can always be improved, if ur chasing the best possible figure for ur aplication then go for it, thats what i did. no point spending big money on a great motor, only to skimp out on something that can give u even more gains...

modifying the stock one is not an option i wanted to do or would recommend...

i have no doubt in my mind that in my application the intake plenum has helped with response, flow..eliminated an ugly engine bay.

ben...

When I blew my engine by accidentally putting way too much boost into it, 3 and 5 pistons were stuffed and 4 was in pretty bad nick. I suppose this is partially due to the middle ones getting more air, thus being leaner at the time.

If you have a PFC you can put more fuel in particular cylinders but I'm not sure what the potential side effects of this is. Can anyone answer that?

Eg, if you did a dodgy cut and shut with the stocker, could you add fuel to 5 and 6 to compensate for extra air?

Yep, there is individual cylinder trim on the PFC.

Mine is set to give a little more fuel to cylinder 6 as it's a problem even on stock plenums.

I have a 2% variance between 1 and 6 and a nice slope in between.

Have you considered the fact that if you just change the position of the Throttle body you are risking blowing your engine, through it leaning out in Cylinder 6?

They're designed to be fed from the side and as such have all the airflow paths made to suit, ensuring that all cylinders get enough air..

If you just simply cut and weld the throttle body to to front you will lack are in some cylinders..

This is almost common sense imo.. Would be interested to see some sort of flow test results for confirmation though.

Nissan spent big $$$ on these plenums getting the flow characteristcs right. Is it not ignorant to think that completly changing the direction and angle of incoming air will not effect how the plenum feeds the cylinders?

Edited by Drift_Limo
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...