Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Looks good, and toyota builds a stronger car than nissan .. sad but true..

But there has been rumours of this for a long time, and nothing has come of it. I believe Toyota has even flatly denied they will ever make another 'Supra'. This could just mean the similar concepts will be called something else, or they're simply nothing more than design ideas.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138269-the-new-supra/#findComment-2575880
Share on other sites

yeah they might not be calling it the supra, kind of like they won't be calling the new GTR a skyline

maybe they'll call it the RZ? given the last TT supra was a RZ supra wasnt it?

having owned a supra myself, i have a soft spot for them, and personally i think that looks absolutely amazing!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138269-the-new-supra/#findComment-2577486
Share on other sites

the rear lights on the supra i seriously do not like. everything else look wise looks awesome. i seriously dont even think it would need a bodykit but to imagin what a bodykit would look like on this would make it more interesting and possibly more appealing as well.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138269-the-new-supra/#findComment-2577508
Share on other sites

i like the prototype, looks hot, definately a good one, compared to the other i have seen of other vehicles.

it actually looks like a newer version of the old supra but modernised.

alot of new cars are looking way to crazy in design, a bit out there and they loose there sporty appeal and start looking like luxury cars not sports cars.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138269-the-new-supra/#findComment-2577784
Share on other sites

Its not hard to beat the 350Z - its underpowered and overweight.

That said, is the Supra even meant to be a Z competitor? I always thought that, as the flagship, it was meant to be a GT-R competitor. In my mind, its always been a step above. Maybe because the Z has always been second fiddle to the GT-R in Nissan's range, but the Supra is the range topper.

Maybe the LF-A will be the GT-R competitor, and the new Supra will be aimed at the Z.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138269-the-new-supra/#findComment-2578453
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...