Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yer im looking at a ross balancer from UAS at the moment for 510 delivered will match my greddy pulleys.. basicaly this is wat we think has happened

locating pin for balancer has sheered in half and balancer has spun on the crank and we cant get the balancer off (we pritty sure thats wat happened anyway) :(

but yer.. yet to get balancer once itsoff will post pics.. and start looking for a replacement hopefully nothign to major.. hope i dont have to buy a new crank

locating pin...are you refering to the half moon keyway? Thats hard to imagine. The keyway to shear in half and let the damper spin.

Can also get an ATI one for about $800-$900. They are rated pretty good from just about everyone. I believe we got ours from Wholesale Performance at Slacks Creek.

Edited by r33_racer

this was the only way we could get the balancer off.. was tryin to find the oil leak.. and well yer balancer wouldnt come off

we are not entirely sure how the balancer was on there as the key isnt broken.. however there appears to be a build up of something on the crank, luckily the crank isnt damaged its cleaned up nicely.. either way time to look for the oil leak and fix everything..

IMG00002.jpg

ATI seem to have the vote, but Ross is also popular. I'm wondering when the cost becomes justified though ie over 8000 rpm? They seem to all be underdriven, which I'm not keen on for a street car anyway. Rocket sells their underdriven 5R Racing brand balancers for only $250 or so but can't tell me how they compare to the ATI or Ross.

I'd like to hear from someone who has tried standard RB26 and then ATI balancers on an RB30 to see if it cures the 'harmonic' probs supposedly associated with the RB30. Michael?

Cheers

We had a std rb25 one on previously...But at that stage we kept the revs to 7k...I dont know exactly how bad the harmonic issue is at 7500, but we had just built a 10k+ 25/30, not interested in taking chances and we needed the extra revs, so the 1000hp ati damper went on as a safe guard. All the research done on them basically said that ATI know what they are doing and their information seemed to make logical sense, plus everyone i spoke to about them had said they are the best around. When the time comes for the annual pull down and rering of the engine, we will inspect everything closely...especially the oil pump and bearings.

ATI have two types. 1st is a 500hp rated ballancer that is bolt on and works good for street cars and the 2nd is a 1000hp ballancer which is bigger and it comes with it's own water pump pully... we have used both and i think the 1000hp ballancer is just great and it fits RB25 -RB26 - RB30 engines...

Thank you

Mick

MICK:

If you wish to advertise your business on the forum please contact "Prank" or "Blitz" about becoming a trader. Also please read the forum rules. Happy to give you the benefit of the doubt this time, but further breaches = warning points.

Thank you.

Beer Baron. (FI Moderator)

Edited by Beer Baron
  • 2 weeks later...

just found this thread and after checking all over the net, ross balancers are supposed to be ANDRA specd to go quicker than 11 secs. so they must be good for decent power. I rang chris mills performance today and found out that they sell them for 230 bucks, but htey wont be released for another 6/8 weeks.

chriss mills sells ross balancers for 230???

i ended up ordering one from justjap

apprently tomei in japan have been testing these and ross have just released a new version of the balancer due to tomei reporting slight problems above 500kw and the new on has supposdly fixed all that..

get back to me on that chris mills performance price.. 230 sounds like utter crap :) or the old designed left overs!

Wazfone016.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know if you can disassemble the thing and put it backwards for different ramp rates. They're both "2 ways" or both "1.5 ways" because well, 2 ways and 1.5 ways are the same 'thing' I do not know for sure, but I believe the 38420-RSS15-B5 is the 1 way, and 38420-RSS20-B5 is the two way. In other words, I predict Nissan considers this: to be a 1.5 way. No idea what actually happens when it arrives/you disassemble it. It would be an excellent question to ask Nismo directly! I somehow doubt you will get an answer though, I feel you would be the first person to document what you encounter when you open the box and the internet would be grateful.
    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...