Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I had my car put on the dyno yesterday at PITS and after a good 5hrs, the car didnt make anymore power than when i drove it in. There was some really weird things happening and i am racking my brains to think what the problem could be. First of all i will give you some specs of what the car is running:

Turbos and Exhaust

HKS GT-SS Turbos

Port matched and Flowed Manifolds

HKS Style Split Dump Pipes

Custom CES Front Pipes (3 ½inch Collector)

Catco Metal Cat

Trust 3 ½ inch cat back exhaust

Intake and Cooling

De-meshed standard AFM’s

PWR Intercooler

Oil Cooler and Remote Filter Kit

Fuel System

Sard 700cc Injectors

Bosch 044 fuel pump adapted in tank. (now direct wired)

Engine & Drivetrain

OS Giken Cam Gears

Gates Timing Belt

Standard internals

HKS GD Pro Twin Plate Clutch

Electronics

Apexi Power FC

Turbosmart EBoost2 Boost Controller.

The car made a maximum of 270awkw at 21psi of boost (which is what it made before bringing it in). To me that boost level seems way too high for the power level that i put out. According to the rb26 turbo upgrade thread, people running similar mods (with GT-SS's) are more around the 310kw mark at the same or lower boost levels.

Another thing that was odd, was that the afr's were differing greatly at the same load points. ie, we would do the low load tuning, get the afrs nicely around the 14.7 mark, come back later and they would be at either the 15.2 mark or 13.8. Both Matty and I were stumped and he said that he had never seen that before using a power fc.

The fuel pump also started making some weird noises later in the day, which we had put down to heat since the car had been running for so long. Matt said that the problems may be due to the charcoal canister purging unusually, and to try unplugging it and crosschecking with my tech edge to see if it fixes it.

So after that long explanation, my questions are:

Why does the car seem low on power for the amount of boost being pushed through it,

What could cause such fluctuations in the AFR's,

What could be done to gain the power that the car seems to be down on (ie would poncams make much of a difference?)

Thanks for reading guys!

Tony

PS. Top points to Matty for being such a good sport about it!! He really knows his stuff!

Dyno graph is from the original tune up, but looks pretty much the same as after we had finished.

post-26698-1160698615.jpg

Edited by SLVR32GTR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138502-someone-stole-my-kws/
Share on other sites

I was thinking along the lines of:

Maybe there is a small leak in the intake piping, which would sort of explain irregular afr's, especially if the leak is affected by heat.

The air flow meters are maxxed out, but im not sure if this would actually affect power output as i dont think they would be a restriction.

Maybe fuel delivery is still an issue? Stock regulator is playing up or something?

One thing i forgot to mention also, is that before we direct wired the pump, it was running at 12.3volts at idle, but under boost, it was reducing down to 10.55volts.

More details can be found in the RB26 turbo upgrade thread here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...93880&st=40

Edited by SLVR32GTR

sounds to me like it's time to upgrade the AFMS so it can be tuned properly. that would account for your wayward AFRs I reckon as the engine is reading the same airflow after a certain point, but different things may be happening. also, it's possible your JASMA certified exhaust has quite restrictive mufflers.

sounds to me like it's time to upgrade the AFMS so it can be tuned properly. that would account for your wayward AFRs I reckon as the engine is reading the same airflow after a certain point, but different things may be happening. also, it's possible your JASMA certified exhaust has quite restrictive mufflers.

Woops, it is a 3 1/2 inch Trust Cat back exhaust, changed in first post. It seems like a very open exhaust with a straight through muffler design.

I was thinking of upgrading to 2 x rb25 afms, but i was under the impression that this wont actually increase power as the air flow may be reading the same points, but it is not actually restricting the flow. We had it set up for the best AFR's on top boost, and it resulted in slightly richer runs in the lower boost settings (as they used the same load points.)

yeah i agree with beer baron. Have to compliment you on your car and your mods always gets me tempted into investing in a R32 gtr but the chances of finding one in good nick are impossible.

Thanks LatinR33, it took a good 6 months to find the GTR i bought, as there was a lot of junk out there. It had a genuine 67,000k's on it when i got it, as can be determined by the condition of the engine and interior parts that we examined carefully.

All of the fitting of the performance parts was carried out by myself with the help of some mechanic mates and the use of a hoist. Although it was a b*tch to work on in the cramped engine bay, i really enjoyed the hands on and knowing that i had done it myself.

Cheers

Tony

Hey Tony,

I wouldn't bother with the RB25 AFMS. go straight for a set of Nismo ones, or if you must VG30s. I personally dont think the physical size is much (any?) of a restriction. clearly in your case though, the sensor is out of range and needs to be replaced.

Hey Beer Baron,

So are the VG30 afm's the same diameter as the RB26 items? That would be handy as i wasnt too keen on changing the original pipework.

I understand that this would help to improve the AFR's, but do you think that this would find any of the power that seems to be missing??

Also, before taking it to matty, i went for a cruise with some mate, and while we were sitting there idling, the car seemed to be running super rich and fouled the plugs a bit. As we drove off the car coughed and spluttered for about 1 minute or so afterwards. Would this imply that the plugs are no longer working at optimum?? They are PFR7B's and are only about 3 months old at most.

Cheers

Tony

the VG30 AFMS (comonly called Z32s) are larger than stock, so new pipework, or adapters is needed. The nismo ones are basically the sensor from a VG30 AFM put in the body of an RB26 AFM so they are direct bolt on.

the plugs should be fine. it may be worth taking them out and giving them a carefull clean. it sounds like the tuning may be the problem with fouling at idle.

After thinking about it at lunch, the only thing i could come up with, with respect to the low power, is that the head isnt breathing enough. It couldnt be an air or fuel issue as the engine is seeing 21psi and there is enough fuel to balance the AFR's, (Obviously you need more fuel and the associated air to make more power) so i think maybe the cam gear settings arent at optimum. I never checked them after i got it tuned the first time, but that would explain the drop off of power at the top end.

I think the missing power may just be the result of un-tuned cam gears or due to the lack of after market cams. Would this be the culprite??

Cheers

Tony

Something just isn't breathing...

Are the cams dialled in properly (In the correct position) they may be opening and closing too early or late.

Head might not be flowing adequately either.

Turbo may be out of efficiency. Did you try winding the turbo down to see how much lower you can get boost without loosing much power?

I’m under the impression a RB26 head will flow well over 400rwkw.. so beh.

I think your confusing the difference between AFM's being a restriction to physical air flow and them running out of signal output resolution. Nismos units will just bolt up to your stock piping and plugs.

Your loss of kw's is a bugger, could be a lota things, fouled plugs, lack of good spark, incorrect exhaust cam settings, fuel pressure fluctuations, ex GF, jealous work office colleague - write a list, and think of scenario to fault find each problem, work your way down :dry:

Good luck man

- mikey

I’m under the impression a RB26 head will flow well over 400rwkw.. so beh.

I think your confusing the difference between AFM's being a restriction to physical air flow and them running out of signal output resolution. Nismos units will just bolt up to your stock piping and plugs.

Your loss of kw's is a bugger, could be a lota things, fouled plugs, lack of good spark, incorrect exhaust cam settings, fuel pressure fluctuations, ex GF, jealous work office colleague - write a list, and think of scenario to fault find each problem, work your way down :)

Good luck man

- mikey

Kier Wilson (I think it's him) runs his 8 second drag car on stock RB26 head. This would indicate a flow capability of much more.

Hey guys,

I will be away for work until Thursday, but i would appreciate if you could all leave your comments/ideas on why my gtr seems down on power!

Thanks

Tony

Try re-meshing the AFM's. Why you would remove the mesh is totally beyond comprehension. The mesh is designed to improve AFM readings to be more accurate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...