Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmm when Dermie ran through the pack he was considered a hero - when Ablett flattened Worsfold in the GF with no eyes for the ball that's also considered a great play......

Let's face it - in all sport you have to be a bastard if you truely want to win at the highest level.

So let's not kid ourselves and think that other F1 drivers are any more gentlemanly - there is too much money in it for that to occur. (Atleast not on the track ;-)

So when you strip that back then Schumacher was the greatest.

Yes he had the best team behind him for much of it - but he had to build most of it around him, and keep it, and keep his drive and make sure his co-drivers didn't beat him and then beat the opposition.

When I watched F1, I often saw Schumacher cruise for 90% of the race - well within his capacity - but in those laps around about the pit stops, or when he had to catch up because of a spin or other misfortune (such as the one last night) that's when you saw the best driver in F1, carving through the field, posting best laps, wrestling the car around a circuit. I'll miss those moments - they were sublime.

Ohh and in private life it seems he was a pretty good bloke - donated $5million to the Tsunami appeal last year for example.

When I watched F1, I often saw Schumacher cruise for 90% of the race - well within his capacity - but in those laps around about the pit stops, or when he had to catch up because of a spin or other misfortune (such as the one last night) that's when you saw the best driver in F1, carving through the field, posting best laps, wrestling the car around a circuit. I'll miss those moments - they were sublime

spot on mate

and when he passed kimi to get 4th spot

absolutley brilliant....

showed how much of a champion he is...

and will be.

There is a distinct difference between the "most successful" & "greatest".

When you consider the achievments of some others, for example:

Jacky Stewart:

Three World Championships.

Completely revolutionised the sport in terms of safety. Many GP drivers owe their lives to the deeply unfashionable stance that Stewart took in the early 70's.

Jack Brabham.

Three World championships, including one in a car bearing his own name and with an Australian built engine.

Pierless integrity.

Niki Lauda.

Three world championships.

Astonishing bravery in coming back from a terrible accident in Germany.

Astonishing integrity in withdrawing from the 76 Japanese GP on safety grounds when the championship was on the line & rejecting Ferraris offers to make excuses about the car breaking.

Damon Hill.

World Champion.

Led Williams in the wake of the trauma induced from Sennas death. Just like his old man did with Lotus after the demise of Jim Clark.

If you want to measure greatness, you may want to think about those blokes achievements before talking about Schumacher....

Also, like ctjet says. Take a look at the old in car footage of the turbo cars (there will be some on you tube somewhere). Those cars had to be DRIVEN....

talking about the greatest driver, those other "feel good" factors don't come into it for me. sure Stewart did great things for safety standards, but that doesn't make him a better driver.

And Brabham was from an era where engineer/drivers were fairly commonplace. Sure he was a very good engineer too, but again that doesn't make him a better driver. And there is simply no room for that to happen in today's motorsport.

Damon Hill one of the greats? Not in my book. He was very good - you don't win a drivers championship if you're not, but how on earth does he rank as one of the greats? You seriously wan tto measure Schuey up against Damon Hill? :(

talking about the greatest driver, those other "feel good" factors don't come into it for me. sure Stewart did great things for safety standards, but that doesn't make him a better driver.

And Brabham was from an era where engineer/drivers were fairly commonplace. Sure he was a very good engineer too, but again that doesn't make him a better driver. And there is simply no room for that to happen in today's motorsport.

Damon Hill one of the greats? Not in my book. He was very good - you don't win a drivers championship if you're not, but how on earth does he rank as one of the greats? You seriously wan tto measure Schuey up against Damon Hill? >_<

You missed my point entirely. What I am saying is that (in my book) there is a difference between successful & great. Greatness requires more than just winning races or even championships. You have to include the other qualities the drivers bought to the sport.

By way of an example many people consider Stirling Moss to be one of the best ever GP drivers. He never won a world championship. For that matter Chris Amon, for all his skill never even won a race. Jacky Stewart contested all of 99 GP's. Gilles Villeneuve dragged his Ferrari around many tracks & posted results that were all about him & not about the car. Different era's, different expectations.

no I got your point. you don't like Schuey and you will define greatness in whatever way you want do the nice guys can get a look in, and MS doesn't. And you've got a list as long as your arm of people you feel were more deserving than him.

Is Schumacher the greatest ?

To date. Yes. Clearly.

I suggest some of you guys go and find the youtube videos outlining why he is so good.

Comparing driver vs drvier is extremely hard accross era's.

Example.

Fangio is respected as an altime great, yet, in his era it was common place too have the second driver come in and swap cars with the lead driver if his car was failing.

Copmpare Schumacher against his team mates and rivals of the last 10 years. Who has challenged him ?

No-One.

Hill, Hakkinen, Villeneuve, Alonso have all beaten him in superior cars. Thats fact.

Look at some of Schumachers results during a WDC Winning year and compare his results vs Barrichello and Irvine.

The world did miss out on Senna Vs Schumacher. No disrepect too Senna, but working out averages, Schumacher comes out on top.

no I got your point. you don't like Schuey and you will define greatness in whatever way you want do the nice guys can get a look in, and MS doesn't. And you've got a list as long as your arm of people you feel were more deserving than him.

Well I dunno. Some people maintain that you can't be both a good bloke & great at the same time. Some people say you can't be regarded as great if you aren't also a good bloke. Each to their own I guess. For my 10 cents I prefer my heroes to be from the old school - more your Alan Shearer type.

Well I dunno. Some people maintain that you can't be both a good bloke & great at the same time. Some people say you can't be regarded as great if you aren't also a good bloke. Each to their own I guess. For my 10 cents I prefer my heroes to be from the old school - more your Alan Shearer type.

you've obviously never heard any of MS' team-mates/members interveiwed. even many of his rivals have nothing but praise for him as a person. the good stories don't get near as much exposure. what about his donations to charity? one in particluar that was $10million!

Well I have & unsuprisingly they do say that. Pretty much the only time I can remember team members not saying things along those lines was when Frank Williams' was talking about Nigel Mansell. Or Mario Andretti about Mansell. Or Prost about Mansell. Or Senna about Prost. Or Prost about Senna. Or Mansell about Piquet. Or Piquet about Mansell. The more level the team mates the less well they tend to get on.

Many of his rivals have more than a little vitriol for him aswell.

What a great read. some seriosuly stupid posts in here by some people

first up my good mate ctjet. a true f1 fan in every sense of the word, and more so a true mclaren fan....who will settle for another team beating ferrari, rather than worry about how his own team is going, just because he hates ferrari....so i wont bother with your comments champ :)

Djr...the thread is about the greatest driver. not the nicest guy or who worried about safety the most. hrd-hr30 has already put your posts to rest so i wont bother :banana:

Last nights race was the perfect example of MS. Massa was demolishing the entire field with consistently superior lap times, by a long way. He was doing that in clean air. Yet MS who had nothing but bad luck was fighting his way through the field, going faster than Massa, setting fastest laps after taking on 20+ laps of fuel, showing you all how to pass in F1.

The man is a legend. He IS the greatest driver that F1 has seen, and plenty of people have already posted in here showing just why that is the case.

If he stayed next year he would almost certainly take the title, with Raikkonen second, and alonso crying in 3rd or worse.

What sets MS apart from every other driver in F1 is his un rivalled passion and determination. He has done everything there is to do in F1. Won everything, broken every record, set every record. Yet each and everytime he wins a race, to anyone that didnt follow F1, it would seem like he had just won his first race.

He had all the money anyone could ever hope for, and was racing purely for victory and love of the sport.

F1 will never be the same again.

Farewell MS. You are an inspiration, and a legend.

F1.JPG

AMEN BROTHER!!!!!!!!!!!

this year had been the BEST F1 season I have ever seen........the climb back to the top.....fighting til the very end. That I will tell to the grandkids in the years to come.

Statistics wise maybe.

But when he took damon hill out in the Aussie GP YEARS ago, when it was the last race of the season. That was it for me. All Damon need to beat Shumacher was finish in the points or something.

Then the 'spin' out more recently to try and get the advantage with quali. I dont like the man, I feel he is a VERY poor loser. My thoughs at least. Good driver, I dont know about the best, I think you need the whole package. I dont think the worlds best driver will ever see F1 dude to the money they need to have to get in to it. I think the money is also an issue, but thats another story.

And Senna was cut off short.

Edit, best F1 season ever were the old days pre aero and advertising. They had some on ABC 2 the other day. Best thing to watch.

Edited by dangerous_daveo

Formula one is the most boring motorsport to watch in the world. With maybe the exception of Nascar.

Nothing really happens you may get 1 or 2 brilliant over taking moves a race and thats it.

And the drivers are more concerned with money than anything else.

Schumacher in respect to his skill and ability to push under some circumstances in which other's would give up to me is rated as one of the top drivers. In respect to some of his acts on the other hand I do disagree his wasn't the most best sportsman i've ever seen.

How many people can you say back when Benetton (and Schumacher himself) were very young to come from the back of the field to win?? And in the previous race, after a puncture and starting 10th the ability to finish fourth where other's would have cruised around made it more entertaining. I do agree that in natural ability Senna was better, but i do rate Schumacher. Oh...and for technical infringements, blame the team and the tech heads in the team who know what they are doing. As it's them who know the true technicalities.

Whether he'll remain one of the best will soon to be seen. Now for the next generation of drivers to come through :D And when people say about money and the likes, then how come Schumacher outclassed most of his driving partners and pushed, yet they had the same car? (i do disagree with team rules however).

The Damon Hill Incident can be debated for a long time. Was Schumacher totally in control of the car ? Did he even realize Hill was in that position after the impact with the wall.

I think it was more a racing incident.

The Villeneuve Incident - Schumacher has PUBLICALLY admitted that this is his greatest regret in racing.

I suppose most of us Schumacher fans will get 110% behind Webber now... I'll always love watching Webber, but there will be a huge hole in the sport for ages post-schumacher.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...