Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Greddy plenum from Greenline arrived today 885 delivered makes it a bit cheaper than plazmaman :D

Thats true, they are cheaper BUT you also need to consider that with that plenum you will need to also spend money on either a Q45 TB (150ish?) or the greddy adaptor plate which is $111 delivered on nengun at the moment. Also, dont quote me here but im not sure if you can run the standard fuel rail on the greddy plenum very easily (i think it needs to be modified) so most people then go for an aftermarket rail with top feeders instead.

Dont get me wrong im sure the plenums are brilliant and will make just as much power as any other aftermarket item, but the cost factors above ended up with me just biting the bullet and getting a plazmaman item in the end for $1200 delivered.

Just something to consider for potetntial buyers.

your thinking about relocating the throttle body to the front of the factory plenum. Greddy, Plasmaman and other quality aftermarket plenums are flow tested and deliver the correct airflow to each cylinder :)

There is actually a discussion on that because tests have proven that even with a genuine greddy plenum the furthest cylinders (5 & 6) run slighly leaner. You can read what SK has to say about it here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=23842

This probably happens with plazmaman as well due to the forward facing long nature of the plenum so dont think im singling out on greddy....just providing facts.

Edited by rinmak

yet the hypertune plenum supposedly gives damn near perfect airflow to each cylinder especially 5 and 6.

If you have some level of fabricating skills you can make up an adaptor plate for the std throttle body to suit the greddy plenum easy enough. Abit of 10mm ally plate cut to measurements i cant remember right now. Save yourself the 100bux.

You can run the std fuel rail no problems with side feed injectors. The greddy plenum has bolt holes to run both side and top feed rails. Whichever way you want to go.

The plazmaman plenum i believe is designed to take the std throttle body not the q45, so i guess some modifying will need to be done inorder to run it...when i figure it out i will let everyone know unless somebody else has already done it.

Unless someone could show me some flow bench results or side by side (before and after) dyno results I think the plazmaman plenum is one hell of an overpriced 1/2 a plenum. 1200 bucks for basically a polished box that sits on top of the stock runners.

Those interested in the performance gains to be had from aftermarket plenums are not going to stop there. In the main they will want to upgrade the t/b and the fuel rail etc so it makes that cost a moot point really.

I went with the greddy job But there is nothing that says I wont change if someone can give me good enough reason to. For the moment tho its greddy all the way. A proven performer. :D

Ill show you dyno results noel after ours is all going....we should see less lag with improved low to mid range torque and power. Those damn short runners kill the low end power and response. But i guess we are looking for just about everything we can get to help us out. 1200 bux is abit much, good thing we didnt pay that price :D

Ill show you dyno results noel after ours is all going....we should see less lag with improved low to mid range torque and power. Those damn short runners kill the low end power and response. But i guess we are looking for just about everything we can get to help us out. 1200 bux is abit much, good thing we didnt pay that price :D

LOL, Your before and after will in no way be a true comparison Mik and you know it ya cheeky young pup.

How are you going to factor out the massive headwork, cams, solid conversion, computer, etc, etc etc.

What I would like to see is a true side by side comparo with zero other changes other than the dyno touchups required to enable each product to do its best.

If i were going to manufacture and market such a product the first thing i would do is test it against the known benchmark and if the results were positive i would sing it to the world.

To date all I have seen is anecdotal evidence, Not conclusive enough for me.

im sure they would have done some comparisons...they would be somewhere. I dont think someone would come up with something and not prove it...thats just silly marketing. Ive only heard from workshops who have used them that have seen the benefits of running them in comparison to greddy or std manifolds.

im sure they would have done some comparisons...they would be somewhere. I dont think someone would come up with something and not prove it...thats just silly marketing. Ive only heard from workshops who have used them that have seen the benefits of running them in comparison to greddy or std manifolds.

I reiterate....anecdotal evidence. :D

Ill show you dyno results noel after ours is all going....we should see less lag with improved low to mid range torque and power. Those damn short runners kill the low end power and response. But i guess we are looking for just about everything we can get to help us out. 1200 bux is abit much, good thing we didnt pay that price :)

That's what i was concerned/thinking about. The shorter runners would effect low-mid range power/torque. But if the shorter runners decreases low-mid power, then surely it will increase mid-high range power. In which case i am not fussed, as the rb25/30, with a GT30R, is hardly going to have any lag :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually, that's not entirely true. It's also the same motor in the 1st gen Nissan Cube but they're rare as hen's teeth.  
    • Yeah it is always worth testing and balancing actuators out of the box, just set the pressure regulator on a compressor very low (eg 5 psi) and increase it slowly to see when they both move.....unfortunately while you may be able to adjust the length of the actuator rod to minimise any difference, the actual pressure they move from is not adjustable so you need a well matched pair. And yes, the VCAM is probably contributing; the earlier in the rev range they come on boost and the slower the revs build (I think your demo was in 5th), the more you notice it.  Driving at WOT through 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc you will probably never hear it as any shuffling starts and is over super quickly
    • oh they were with that motor, you need to remove the engine to change the spark plugs (don't have to, but it does make it easier)
    • I certainly fall into the annoyed camp, but glad to hear that if it's happening at low boost then I'm not likely going to blow a turbo and end up with metal shards in my oil. Just feels like it prevents me from really driving it without hesitation and "peak" performance. Wonder if it's the VCAM, it did an impressive job of shifting the torque curve and faster spool, but maybe now it's "too fast" and there's too much air for how open the throttle is.  Based on some other threads, will also do some reading on synchronizing the actuators. They are the default actuators that come on the Garrett's and I would think they would be set the same coming from the factory, but if the turbos don't actually work exactly the same way at the same time as previously mentioned, it would be worth making sure the actuators are actuating together properly
    • I went down this rabbit hole before, ended up sourcing a motor from the UK (I'm in Japan) which also didn't function correctly. With the original motor, I disassembled it and reassembled it and it works somewhat, sometimes. What I could deduce from all my screwing around is that there is calibration of the gears on the inside of the motor and two ramps on the main gear which activate switches that operate the motor and move the sunroof either to retract into the roof or tilt. Where I got stuck was that, it seemed in my case that one or both of the switches that are activated by the ramp on the gear did not always activate and thus the motor did not move, causing it to sometimes not retract or tilt (apologies, I've forgotten which way it didn't work.).  Of course this part is discontinued at Nissan now, it's the same part in the S15 but no other models. I also contacted the manufacturer of the component for schematics - forgot the name, they're based in Gifu - but they declined to share the information due to being bound by an NDA, sadly. Looking through my pictures now, it seems I last had a crack at this in 2022. See, I so kindly wrote "open" and "close" next to the switches. If you figure it out, please do tell me. Those little switches, with the red buttons may need to be replaced.
×
×
  • Create New...