Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just saw this and it seems to be a really nice car. Series 2, Volk GT-C's, Ganador mirrors, GTR bonnet with gap filled up by front bar, Roll cage, wide fenders/pumped guards, Power FC, 270rwkw, Blitz FMIC, Nismo dash, nice seats etc.

Depending on how much the car goes for it wouldn't be a bad buy! It'd be one of those cars you buy and simply don't have to do anything to.

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/2000-Nissan-Skyline...1QQcmdZViewItem

What you guys think?

I'd definately consider it if I didn't have my car, although I'd remove the decals, go for a milder wing and would get R34 tail lights back!

Edited by OnGsTa
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/144128-pretty-nice-r34-gtt-on-auction/
Share on other sites

It'd be one of those cars you buy and simply don't have to do anything to.

Yeah.... you wouldn't have to do anything to it...

.....other than remove the GTR badging, remove the ridiculous wing, remove the awful decals, remove the illegal BOV, remove the ridiculously oversized and un-needed tacho, replace the illegal gear shift knob, and re-trim the interior & replace the dash to get rid of all the holes and re-gain the use the vents etc etc etc. :)

*shrug* each to their own I guess.

Use of the terms

"roller cage"

"Fibroglass Cabon bonnet"

"APEX computer"

"looks like a GTR"

makes you wonder if they even own the car, or have any idea what's what.

...and what's up with those tail lights. :woot:

Wow I must be a ricer haha. Seriously though, after taking away the silly decals, GTR badge and the wing I think it would be an awesome car. :)

Oh and I didn't look at the interior properly, that does look like alot of un-needed gauges. As for the description yep he doesn't really sound like he knows what his talking about. :lol:

"APEX computer"

nothing really wrong with that....ECU is often refferred to as an aftermarket computer, and Apex is the correct name for Apex-i (Apex international) or Apexera :)

But i agree, the interior is hideous, and personally would never buy a car off ebay unless I inspected it in person before bidding

either way some guy that just played need for speed: carbon bid on it and its at almost 26g's... why would u pay more for something thats "looks like gtr" and you have to spend more on it to remove the shit thats illegal. basically "Only in japan"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...