Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

Was getting my HKS camshafts that have done 5000klms in my mates r33 GTR yesterday installed in my 32 GTR when I got a phonecall saying that they had installed the inlet 256 8.7mm lift but while installing the exhaust 264 8.7mm lift it broke. Now they are saying that HKS camshafts are of poor quality and that this happens all the time and they are passing the buck to HKS.

What I want to know is this the case? are HKS camshafts poor quality and is it like the lottery- some snap and some dont? any help on this would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/144406-r32-gtr-broken-camshaft/
Share on other sites

Tell the workshop to cough up.

If they can't install a cam shaft without snapping it then they are are obviously doing something wrong. You can also point out that someone obviously managed to install them correctly once before as they were in your mates car.

Guys went to the workshop today and they are going to replace the broken cam with a new one.

Cheers for the replys on this.... hopefully should get some good power.. just for interest sake does anyone know how these cams inlet 256 8.7mm lift and exhaust 264 8.7mm lift will change the power? car has fc and 34 n1 turbos + injectors etc?

Edited by jonnyo

Easy to break the cams.

Even easier if your doing it on the cheap and didn't replace the cam retaining bolts/studs with new ones.

Hopefully you did replace them because that new cam/s may let go (along with the motor) later on thanks to a fatigued old bolt that breaks. You dont have much lift on those cams so you might be lucky. Then again.....

From what i have learnt off all Serious RB Engine builders is

If you havent smashed an oil pump or Snapped a cam your not a serious rb motor builder

this sounds pretty ridiculous, so your saying unless you have broken a cam whilst installing them your not a serious engine builder ??

if the torqueing procedure and order isnt followed correctly sure they will break, but thats because your either being lazy or dont know what your doing, i dont see how this makes you better/smarter somehow ?!

with that sort of logic, im finding it hard to understand what exactly went wrong in this case...

Edited by mokompri

The cams are so long that they are very fragile when being torqued down.

I blame the nissan torque steps being too few. I didn't trust them when I first un-torqued and then retorqued mine the first time and I had no issues. I threw in 3 extra steps in between to be sure.

I think if you do enough of them (cam changes) you are likely to break some, especially when customers aren't willing to go for the extra expense of new bolts. Add to that big cams and beefy springs and it doesn't help. 90% of the time old bolts might work could be even higher as a percentage but, that still means you do enough and you get a few broken ones.

The cams are so long that they are very fragile when being torqued down.

I blame the nissan torque steps being too few. I didn't trust them when I first un-torqued and then retorqued mine the first time and I had no issues. I threw in 3 extra steps in between to be sure.

I think if you do enough of them (cam changes) you are likely to break some, especially when customers aren't willing to go for the extra expense of new bolts. Add to that big cams and beefy springs and it doesn't help. 90% of the time old bolts might work could be even higher as a percentage but, that still means you do enough and you get a few broken ones.

Thats comming from hi octane

anyways

we made longer studs to help tension larger lift cams in straight

That happened to my car. the cams i was about to put in looked almost brand new. they were installed but fortunatly they broke before the covers went back on. the crack in the metal was there for a while, oil that was to lube the cam had penetrated the crack quite some way through which makes me think they were damaged or broken already. got tomei poncams now, all good!

Hi MR331307,

Who are Hioctane? Do you mean the company over east? or some sort of mag?

I initially did the torque steps because I took the cams off without a manual, so I was carefull and used a bit of logic to guestimate the sequence, kind of easy to do though. Then a friend let me have a look at the manual he had before I put the new cams in and I just decided there needed a few more steps.

The cams are so long that they are very fragile when being torqued down.

I blame the nissan torque steps being too few. I didn't trust them when I first un-torqued and then retorqued mine the first time and I had no issues. I threw in 3 extra steps in between to be sure.

I think if you do enough of them (cam changes) you are likely to break some, especially when customers aren't willing to go for the extra expense of new bolts. Add to that big cams and beefy springs and it doesn't help. 90% of the time old bolts might work could be even higher as a percentage but, that still means you do enough and you get a few broken ones.

lets stop for a second and see what your saying implies. "if you do enough cam changes you are likely to break some", now this begs the question... what about the ones that didnt break ?? why DIDNT they break ?

and so what seperated them, from the ones that broke ? if the problem is not with the installation, then it goes back to being the product, and i dont think a company like hks will have random quality control of their camshafts.

if nissans torqueing procedure isnt sufficient, then a "serious engine builder" should know better. either from experience (which the workshop in this topic claims to having), or knowledge.

and as for replacing new bolts, i dont see how this will affect breaking the cam, if the bolt is too fatigued/stretched to be reused, and is used, then it will snap/shear. it should not have any bearing on the breakage of the cam. i know this, because i snapped a bolt when i did my cam change :spank::sick:

Edited by mokompri

Mokompri,

The world of mechanics is ruled by Murphys law as well as those physics ones.

One of the most common misconceptions about using a torque wrench to tighten bolts like these or on a head is that the torque reading on the wrench indicates how much load is on each bolt. The reading on the wrench only tells you how much twisting force is being applied on each bolt. The actual clamping load will be much, much higher, and will depend on the friction in the threads, the size, pitch and diameter of the treads, and the length of the bolt, temp (good to do it on a hot day but, not for the person) and things like how long the stupid cam is and the bending forces it goes through on the way to sitting nicely in there.

For example a stretched bolt might bottom out at a different height to a healthy bolt from and therefore can give you issue. Sometimes not right away but, maybe the next week or next month it goes or you get lucky and nothing happens for a year till you go racing.

These bolts are run of the mill units that acheive maximum clamp at thier yeild point which if exceeded has them deform to some extent, permanently. Unlike a TTY style of head bolt these don't spring back up to it's yield point as they deform. So if they have had some use you are best to ditch them. It also means even new ones can cause grief as the leverage along such a long stick of metal makes for a bigger margin for error.

So change those old bolts and cross your fingers.

Hope that sheds some light.

Then again maybe an engine builder or two would like to put thier hand up for a record number of RB cam changes without a breakage?

Edited by rev210

physics i agree, but murphys law is philosophy - i dont think it belongs here. murphys law is something thats used when shit happens and the real problem cant be explained, but i believe theres a reason for everything.

friction on the threads should always be around the same, as your supposed to oil the bolts and the holes so that variation doesnt occur, and all those other variables stay the same anyways (size, pitch etc). the temperature variation you get in aus is probably around 20 degrees celcius through the year, hardly something that will have much affect in the process.

in my engine i had the snapped bolt removed, and replaced with a new one. the engine ran thousands of km's after that, then i sold the car. but anyways, with all that you have said it practically puts the cause of inconsistency here to murphys law, which doesnt really say much at all does it

physics i agree, but murphys law is philosophy - i dont think it belongs here. murphys law is something thats used when shit happens and the real problem cant be explained, but i believe theres a reason for everything.

friction on the threads should always be around the same, as your supposed to oil the bolts and the holes so that variation doesnt occur, and all those other variables stay the same anyways (size, pitch etc). the temperature variation you get in aus is probably around 20 degrees celcius through the year, hardly something that will have much affect in the process.

in my engine i had the snapped bolt removed, and replaced with a new one. the engine ran thousands of km's after that, then i sold the car. but anyways, with all that you have said it practically puts the cause of inconsistency here to murphys law, which doesnt really say much at all does it

Hey Guys,

Just for your info we have built over 1000 RB engines and have never had 1 breakage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Fark what are the changes of that snapping like that, clean. Nek minnit, custom radiator goes in, with built in oil cooler like those discontinued PWR ones from yesterdeacades ago
    • I thought I'd do a write up on an auto transmission fluid change for a the nissan 7 speed Automatic. At some stage the genius engineers decided that the fluid in the trans was "for the life of the transmission", (which seems kind of self supporting to me) and removed the dip stick and fill tube (funnily enough there is still a casting for it). Anyway, for this job you do need 2 specialist tools in addition to regular hand tools, jack and good chassis stands. You need a way to pump fluid up to the transmission; I got one of these but there are plenty of other options: https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/364584087070 Don't trust the generic listing though, it does not come with the required adapter for the Nissan 7 Speed. You need one of these, can't do the job without it: https://navarapart.com.au/product/genuine-nissan-patrol-y62-d23-np300-navara-re7-dipstick-fill-connector1 You need a heap of compatible transmission oil. Could be Nissan, could be anything else rated for Nissan Matic S. You need at least 10 litres, I had 15 to give it a better flush... Also, you need some biiig oil catch trays, at least one of these, or bigger if possible (volume was fine, size was very marginal): https://autobarn.com.au/ab/Autobarn-Category/Tools-%26-Garage/Specialty-Tools/Oil-Service/Garage-Tough-Oil-Drain-Pan-Black-16L---GT1068/p/TO03191 Finally, a measuring jug is very useful if your pump does not have volumes marked on it, I got a 6l one: https://www.repco.com.au/oils-fluids/fluid-accessories/measuring-jugs/penrite-measuring-jug-6l-pmj006/p/A5322648 Oh, and gloves.....this stuff is horrible (not as bad as diff oil, but getting there) ....First, jack up your car.....
    • So I mentioned the apprentice, @LachyK helped take the bonnet off. We just undid the nuts on the hinges and unclipped the gas struts, then pulled the bonnet back a little as the front was catching on the front bar.  I had a good look at everything today and have removed the rams, repaired/reset the hinges and bolted it back together like it never happened. I'll do a separate write up on the repair, and I also removed the poppers from the Fuga today too to save grief down the road.....as said above it is at least $5k to repair retail. I'm also happier about my ability to prepare a race car, and less happy about Nis-nault's engineering (I can hear @GTSBoy sAfrican Americaning) because the top hose of the radiator didn't slip off.......it snapped clean off. By practice I put the hose clamp hard up against the flare on a neck to make it least likely to ever move (thanks @Neil!). I guess that puts a little more pressure on the end of the pipe as it is further away from the rad, but still, that is pretty shit. I've put it back on for now as there was a fair bit of neck still there, but obviously there is no lip on the neck any more so I don't think I'll track it again until I have a new rad. Speaking of which....more research required. It looks like Koyo makes a standard size radiator in ally which I'll grab in the meantime, but I really want something thicker so might have to go custom in the medium term (ouch) Coolant still needs a refill and I have the pressure tester on it over night, but other than a wash down of the engine bay it seems alright. And @MBS206 noted something noisy on the front of the engine and I think I agree....time for a new accessory belt and tensioners I think.
    • our good friends at nismo make a diff for it, I have one (and a spare housing to put the centre in) on the way. https://www.nismo.co.jp/products/web_catalogue/lsd/mechanical_lsd_v37.html AMS also make a helical one, but I prefer mechanical for track use in 2wd (I do run a quaife in the front, but not rear of the R32)
    • What are we supposed to be seeing in the photo of the steering angle sensor? The outer housing doesn't turn, right? All the action is on the inside. The real test here is whether or not your car has had the steering put back together by a butcher. When the steering is centred (and we're not caring about the wheel too much here, we're talking about the front wheels, parallel, facing front) then you should have an absolutely even number of turns from centre to left lock and centre to right lock. If there is any difference at all then perhaps the thing has been put back together wrongly, either the steering wheel put on one spline (or more!) off, and the alignment bodged to straighteb the wheel, or the opposite where something silly was done underneath and the wheel put back on crooked to compensate. Nut there isn't actually much evidence that you have such a problem anyway. It is something you can easily measure and test for to find out though. My money is still on the HICAS CU not driving the PS solenoid with the proper PWM signal required to lighten the load at lower speed. If it were me, I would be putting either a multimeter or oscilloscope onto the solenoid terminals and taking it for a drive, looking for the voltage to change. The PWM signal is 0v, 12V, 0V, 12v with ...obviously...modulated pulse width. You should see that as an average voltage somewhere between 0V and 12V, and it should vary with speed. An handheld oscilloscope would be the better tool for this, because they are definitely good enough but there's no telling if any cheap shit multimeter that people have lying around are good enough. You can also directly interfere with the solenoid. If you wire up a little voltage divider with variable resistor on it, and hook the PS solenoid direct to 12V through that, you can manually adjust the voltage to the solenoid and you should be able to make it go ligheter and heavier. If you cannot, then the problem is either the solenoid itself dead, or your description of the steering being "tight" (which I have just been assuming you mean "heavy") could be that you have a mechanical problem in the steering and there is heaps of resistance to movement.
×
×
  • Create New...