Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the map isnt closed loop, your fuel map is determined by the amount of air passing though your AFM.

your larger turbine will come in later and suck more air later, so until it comes on boost, the ECU will add the correct amount amount of fuel for manifold vacuum.

when it does come on boost, it will see more air going through the AFM and compensate with more fuel

i've got an safc2 which was tuned. from my knowledge about them they correct fuel at SET rpm points, not 'when the turbo kicks in'. someone correct me if im wrong.

i've got an safc2 which was tuned. from my knowledge about them they correct fuel at SET rpm points, not 'when the turbo kicks in'. someone correct me if im wrong.

You're not wrong :santa:

do you plan to turn the car off after a few hot runs to see if the bearings fail?

thats a serious question

Why would you want to do that? Seems stupid to me...

One of the important things about journal-bearing turbos is that oil flow must be maintained. Why would you want to risk farking the turbo by shutting the engine off when the turbo is red hot, just to see if it fails or not? Maybe it won't fail, but you may have caused minor damage which later compounds and causes a bearing to let go???

I would not encourage hot shutdown's, Even with ball bearing turbo's damage can be caused.

It is now common knowledge that doing hot shutdown's not only can damage your turbocharger but damage your engine.

The topic has been covered many times before and logic always prevails.

GTR's have nearly all journal bearing turbo's from factory and very rarely fail unless overboosted.

The failure is because they have ceramic turbines not because they are journal bearing.

Silvia's Journal bearing from factory.

Toyota Supras, Surf's, Celicas.... Journal bearing.

In some cases these are still all going after 100.000km.

So saying that journal bearing turbo's previously have shorter life spans then ball bearing is a little hillarious.

These at the end of the day have been driven like normal cars for many years and nothing has happened in most cases.

There are always a very few amount of people that like to start the debate up every time with the same outcome.

Sometimes hot shutdowns are unavoidable and i have had it occur many times due to something as little as an atmospheric blow off valve making the car stall.

I have pulled apart many turbo's after this instance and bearings have been fine.

There is this huge halo around ball bering turbo's and thoughts that they dont fail.

This is not true and i have had pallot loads of ball bearing turbo's taken away as they do not have the versatility that journal bearing turbo's do and ease of repair.

:D

yeah you know what, that makes sence. why risk farking my turbo? if it fails in the line of duty then so be it, but if it fails from me running it in a way where i wouldnt usually, then whats the point?

exactly.

There are just some haters out there that can't hack people buying $800 hiflows that are comparable to $1600 hiflows.

I won't raise the argument again, but just leave each to their own. I know what i'd rather spend the extra money on :D

  • 4 months later...

i thought an update was needed after so damn long.

the turbo is going strong. VERY strong. im running it on 14psi daily. might hit 18psi a bit later but i havent been bothered opening up my bonnet for a few weeks after all the time ive spent under it lately!

i've sold my SAFC and was getting around 380/tank with the tune i had. on the standard computer im getting 430km/tank which im finding strange.

anyways, the reason for the long reply was i had a few oil problems. i did my valve stem seals, fixed up the pcv and its all running sweet.

also because of the n1 oil pump im using which pumps 25% more oil ive been told, ive made the reducer 4mm as to not flood the turbo.

im going for the greddy ultimate so ill be back with results after im finished with all of my uni work and exams are over (i know ill spend too much time on the car if i get it before!).

What sort of power are you getting out of your beast?

I had my powerfc installed after running my sliding performance high flow on the stock ECU for about a year. It's now putting out 190rwkw on stock boost (7psi), but i cant boost any more at the moment, cause my clutch is slipping!

Time for a new clutch, and then aiming for 230-240kw on slides awesome turbo!

  • 1 month later...

Hey mate, just wondering how its all coming along?

I'll be getting my highflow in a couple of weeks off of slide and this thread is a great read :thumbsup:

Cheers mate

Phil

Edited by PM-R33
Hey mate, just wondering how its all coming along?

I'll be getting my highflow in a couple of weeks off of slide and this thread is a great read :P

Cheers mate

Phil

its going well. comes on boost nice and hard, even with the standard computer.

Interested to see what piggy back your gona put into that car, since its an auto

i can use a pfc if i wanted to champ. dont believe everything you read :mellow:

but i've decided to go with the emanage ultimate (also off slide). its got everything i need + more. i'd probably even go for it if i had a manual.

its going well. comes on boost nice and hard, even with the standard computer.

i can use a pfc if i wanted to champ. dont believe everything you read :mellow:

but i've decided to go with the emanage ultimate (also off slide). its got everything i need + more. i'd probably even go for it if i had a manual.

Hmm i think the emanage provide fuel control and ignitition, but i have read somewhere that the ignigtion control 'retard' is handled by the ecu for shifting.. So i think that you would only benefit from the fuel control.. lol dont qoute me on this but im sure i read it sumhere :P

Hmm i think the emanage provide fuel control and ignitition, but i have read somewhere that the ignigtion control 'retard' is handled by the ecu for shifting.. So i think that you would only benefit from the fuel control.. lol dont qoute me on this but im sure i read it sumhere :P

it is true that the ignition retard is influenced by the auto ecu, but because you have control of ignition through the emanage you can turn that timing back to where its supposed to be at any particular rpm.

this is very interesting because its nearly exactly the same setup as i am going to run..except for the e management (going pfc) and a avcr.

so i am keen to see the results as i am deciding which high flow to go with - the journal like this or the ball bearing., i am not sure that the dramatic increase in price is justified given the comparision of the results.

get it up and keep it posted mate

im trying to get my car ready for the track so i dont think ill be getting an emanage just yet. after the track day ill be saving up for it + a tune. i'll also be getting the sensor so i dont need to run an AFM.

ill MAY be hitting the dyno before the track day to see where my AFRs are at so ill keep you all posted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ahh...should have been clearer ~ there's 2 ... SMJ = super multi junction (connector)...   ...this is connector 6 & 25 in above image -- body harness to engine loom (6) & body harness to main loom (25) Headlights go to front via connector 6 ; fuel gauge goes to tank sender via connector 25  ...like I say this is R33 diagrams, but at a pinch R34 won't be too far different. *IF* the two ground faults are related, this can be the only place where both wires converge (as one runs to the back, the other to the front)... ....thing is, you probably need to establish if the faults are related (unless you examine that area and find obvious chaffing on the looms there to body ground)....*IF* the fuel gauge is still broken (full needle deflection), I'd be headed for the boot, remove fuel sender wire, key on and measure the voltage there ~ it should be roughly 10volts. If that's ok, check sender to ground resistance...if this is a dead short to ground (and there's fuel in it), then sender has failed or something funky has happened to wiring in the tank. edit: ahh...rereading the thread, this is R32....above fuel sender test still valid tho'
    • I just changed the timing belt on my RB25DET NEO and wanted to get some opinions. I’ve been super cautious, did a lot of research, and took my time. I’ve driven the car, and it runs fine. After warming it up, I revved it to 8000 RPM a few times—no issues, everything held up.   After the drive, I heard a noise that I think is either the clutch or possibly a tight accessory belt. It’s not constant, just comes and goes.   I took the timing cover off to double-check everything:   Belt is on properly, Tensioner is tight, Did the 90-degree twist test—belt isn’t too tight or too loose.     What still worries me is that I noticed the belt seems to sit a little toward the front edge of the gears, especially on the idler pulley. It even looks like it’s slightly coming off the edge there. Is that normal?   My old belt (5 years old, ~3,000 miles) also showed a bit of wear on that same edge, so maybe it’s just how it sits? I’m probably overthinking this, but since it’s my first time doing this on a NEO and the engine is forged, I really don’t want to mess anything up.   Also, I’m thinking of swapping to a clear front timing cover with the glass window. Would you recommend NITO or HPI? HPI looks reputable and their covers have 2.5mm thickness, but not sure if there’s a real difference between the two.   Any advice or reassurance would be much appreciated!
    • 40 grit sounds about right, to start. You make some decent cuts/damage in the coating with that, then rapdily scale up to maybe 80 and 120 for the bulk of the actual removal, then fine it off to 180 or 240 perhaps. No need to go any finer than that, and maybe no need to go even as fine as that. Wrap it on a big block and have at it. At least on the hub face.
    • Do the GKTech rear lower control arm mount relocation, and either alloy subframe inserts or very stiff subframe bushes. Traction is going to be at a premium!
    • Hello,   My name if Frederick, i'm 30 years old and I live in Belgium, Europe! I used to have a Nissan 370z daily but since I got a company car I turned that into my seattime driftcar. About 3 years ago I also wanted something older with more feel, so I got an R32 GTST with an rb26 engine. I am now getting the rb built to have around 800hp and it's close to being finished. I'm very excited for how it will drive and how driveable it will be! Regards, Fred!
×
×
  • Create New...