Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Car is 1990 R32 GTR

Power Mods 3" Turbo back zorst, Apexi Pods, Stock Turbos

Other Mods Suspension, Clutch, Aluminium Radiator

First run with stock ECU

Second run with Microtech LTX12 ECU, Bosch Coils and Ignition pack (only changes)

Was fairly surprised with result made 5 kw more with 4 psi less boost

and the 17 psi run, i was a little worried when he told me cause of stock turbos but they held no prob

Car now running 9 psi might turn boost up to 12 psi on weekend and leave it there

Boost isnt as smooth as i would like, but will prob get a Profec B-Spec II soon

All in all im quite happy, what you people think?

RellikZephyr

post-22860-1164790889.jpg

post-22860-1164791026.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145290-power-gains-from-microtech-comp/
Share on other sites

Bloody difficult to compare when one is p and the other in kw. Those MX Dynos are happy in my experience, but not necessarily in this case.

That said you appear to have lost a bit of mid range with the low boost setting. I don't have a GTR but I wouldn't run it at 17psi on stock turbos if I had one. I think that 12-13 daily is fine.

What fuel are you using?

yeah as soon as i was told about the 17 psi i said NOOOOO and turned the boost down to 9 psi

i am running Shell V-Power 98 RON fuel

and thats why i modded the pic to include the KW reading on the HP chart

RellikZephyr

yeah the mechanic wasnt aware they were the stock ceramic turbos

luckily they held and if they didnt not my fault therefore he would have had to fix

but it has told me my stockers are in good nick

RellikZephyr

So your saying this guy will pay for your engine if it blows up when its on the Dyno ???

Tell us his details.. I bags the first tune. This guy is gona get real busy really soon.

yeah the mechanic wasnt aware they were the stock ceramic turbos

luckily they held and if they didnt not my fault therefore he would have had to fix

but it has told me my stockers are in good nick

RellikZephyr

if it blew because HE put too much boost into it

then damn right i would have made him

i never told him to set the boost that high

i had a EBC in there set to 14psi and it evendently wasnt set up quite right

so he put a manual boost controller on (to trouble shoot the EBC) and set the boost to 17 psi of his on decision

if it blew because of that and he didnt want to fix it i would have taken him to court

RellikZephyr

I would suggest its not the engine but the microtech. The resolution on those things is really poor. You just can't have a really good tune. They are great if the car is only going to run flat out (ie drag racing) but not very accurate with partial throttle and closed loop.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
    • And if you have to drill the oil block, then just drill it for 1/4" and tap it BSP and get a 1/8 to 1/4 BSP bush. The Nissan sender will go straight in and the bush will suit the newly tapped hole. And it will be real strong, to boot.
    • No it doesn't. It just needs an ezy-out to pull that broken bit of alloy out of the hole and presto chango - it will be back to being a 1/8" hole tapped NPT. as per @MBS206 recco. That would be for making what you had in alloy, in steel. If you wanted to do just that instead of remote mounting like @Duncan and I have been pushing. A steel fitting would be unbreakable (compared to that tragically skinny little alloy adapter). But remote mounting would almost certainly be 10x better. Small engineering shops abound all over the place. A lathe and 10 minutes of time = 2x six packs.
×
×
  • Create New...