Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi flow turbos, an exhaust, injectors and a tune was pretty much it. The best part was knowing you could take it to the track and knowing it wouldn't blow up

Thats awesome! I new it would of been a few simple mods and off you go.

Yeah marko there dry sumped. 12 litres i think the 965 has

my uncles got a 993 turbo sitting in his garage. bought it new, hasn't been driven for years. Only got 6000ks on it over 17 years.

I want to buy it off him soooo badly

make sure u make it known to him if he ever sells the car that u want it...I did the same with my uncle and now I have his car :)

Whats done to it... very nice 34...

nismo part's:

  • exhaust
  • coilovers
  • suspension link's
  • carbon fibre wing flap & pillar garnish
  • intercooler & piping
  • front bar
  • oil cooler
  • inlet duct
  • radiator cap
  • gear knob
  • wheels & nut's
  • instument cluster
  • led tail lights
  • oil cap

Mines chip, Hks F-con & evc,5 zigen clutchless gear change system & led reverse light.

Motor is still standard on 1bar of boost,236kw's on the gt auto dynopack.thanks Iron chef.

Edited by I gotta R34gtr v-spec

Its nice to see my old 965 still getting around :yes:

Really wow thats nuts! you would be the best person to compare the 965 to the 34 gtr

Paul how does the clutchless gear change system work? Never heard of one of those before

Paul how does the clutchless gear change system work? Never heard of one of those before

I'am still trying to work it out myself Dimi,this box is under the drivers seatpost-93096-0-97203100-1342351817_thumb.jpg

this is under the parcel shelf in the bootpost-93096-0-24627900-1342351848_thumb.jpg

this switch seems to operate it on the dashpost-93096-0-47451100-1342351857_thumb.jpg

switch to the right and a buzzer sounds,hold to the left and the motor looses rev's. :unsure:

Edited by I gotta R34gtr v-spec

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...