Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

This car is a personal import from Tokyo which Im lisiting for sale for the 1st time. Comes with complete Personal Importation paperwork and documentation. The new buyer will be the first to own it in Aus after imported. This 350 is immaculate and has no problems at all. It has all the receipts and books from Nissan and a 2 year Nissan Factory warranty still in Japan (unsure if tranferable). It was inspected by Nissan and Tokyo's RTA for shaken in June. :O

post-5116-1166021473.jpg

2004 Nissan 350Z - Blue, 24,000kms, 6 speed.

Z Side steps (optional extra), Z Floor Mats (optional extra), Nismo GT shift knob

9000k HID, Vertex Bodykit, Carbon Garnish, Volk Racing TE37 19x9.5/19x10.5 (235/30/19) (275/30/19)

Tanabe GF Sustec Pro (Adjustable), HKS Racing Suction Kit, Fujitsubo Legalis R, Nissan TV/DVD/GPS Navigation System, CD/MD Player, Pioneer 2 ways, Kenwood 400w Amp, Pioneer 10inch Subwoofer

Serious enquiries about the purchase of the car only please. The car will be in SA but can be delivered.

Immaculate 24,000kms Modified Z for only $48,000 ready to register :sweat:

More pics can be viewed at [ Vertex 350z ]

If interested, please send me a PM.

Thanks.

Edited by N/A®
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147269-350z-modified-imported-version/
Share on other sites

that car is so hot.. but im still deciding whether to get a 350z or a series 3 R33 GTR? :P

Well actually Ive got both for sale. :)

My car is Aus is a 33 GTR and in Tokyo is the Z.

Whether or not you buy mine, IMHO as someone who owns both, get the Z.

At the end of the day, you are stepping up into a new car. The 33's shape. even a series 3 is nearly 13 years old. Something to consider.

Good luck on your purchase.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...