Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK well i just got my car dynoed and here is the result. the mods are front mount intercooler, hks air filter, turbo back exaust with gutted cat, boost controller set to 10psi, SAFC, and a bosch 910 fuel pump,

also as u can see the car was dynoed at RE CUSTOMS and i cannot thank ray enough i recommend anyone wanting a tune or work done to head down there. i know ill be going back when i get a power fc which will hopefully be soon post-14524-1166431184.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147832-dyno-result-im-happy/
Share on other sites

nice man. nar mine is black i was there on friday aswell and he chucked my car on the dyno and then i got the bad news my fuel pump shit itself so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end car goes great im so pleased. calder on wednesday should be fun

nice man. nar mine is black i was there on friday aswell and he chucked my car on the dyno and then i got the bad news my fuel pump shit itself so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end car goes great im so pleased. calder on wednesday should be fun

fantastic - let us know how your car goes on wednesday..... yeah u might have seen my car there on friday (white s2 r33). welsh plugs gave way when they were doing hte service, so had to change all that - now its running great. Gonna get more mods done through them (the exhaust was done thru them)

That is a very high result for a fairly stock car. especially for only 10psi. I think the dyno is being a bit optamistic. Also your power curve is quite wonky in a couple of places. it might have been slipping on the dyno :P

this was mine with only a couple of mods - done at RE as well

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2753467

i could be wrong, but wouldnt the intercooler and the fuel pump increase the power output significantly?

That dyno reading is a joke, my car has the exact same mods and it sure as hell does NOT have 210kw at the wheels.

Somthing is wrong there.

With those mods id expect about 170rwkw.

cheers

your engine might be getting rather tired, or the dyno you went on under read to some extent (170kw is pretty low for those mods) and his over read to some extent.

for those mods i'd say about 190kw would be pretty accurate. remember that he does have a gutted cat.

ahh 170rwkw was just an estimate.

I havnt had my car dynod as yet but i hav those mods and im also putting on a batmbl front/drump pipe soon with a 5" body cat.

Haha pretty sure after i do that my clutch is sure to die a horrible death.

The only reason i didnt think i had that much power because i raced a mates stock 180 running 10 psi and he beat me by 1/2 a car length.

NOTE: race was conducted at appropriate race track

only way to find out if the power is correct is take the car down to the drags and compare the times/terminal(trap) speeds with others car of that power range.

no point comparing dynos.

my 2cents

My understanding behind shootout mode dynos, was to apply a correction so that most dynos could be compared. Now there is nothing wrong with the figures, as the correct mode was used and the air temps look right.

I am puting my money on either it running too lean, or you have a non-stock turbo in it (hi-flow / aftermarket).

Forget the figure, look at the power curve. something not right.

9 psi by 6h km/ph in 4th? looks like the operator held it on load untill he started the run. This is not really and indication on what the car will do on the street and will F96k up the peak torque figure.

Then there is a taper off and then an full 10 rwkw more at redline.

as long as the car holds boost correctly and the AFR's are safe the figure does not matter really. Still I have NEVER seen a car wth this level of mods produce more 190rwkw.

Glad you are happy with the result :(

Cheers!

yeah I have the same bs figure as well, 199rwkw before tune and 211rwkw after tune with a SAFC2. I must have gotten on a happy dyno as well, must get myself to a more moderate one to test out again, coz there's no way I'm gonna believe that. Although its fun bragging to people about it hahahahah

the only accurate way to compare timeslips from the track is to have the same person drive both cars. in a way they are like dyno readouts. 1 person may be a crap driver, but have more power and better tyres, suspension, etc, but still run a slower time at a slower speed than someone who can driver really well.

so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end

it should already be waaay rich with the new pump and stock ecu... he would have been leaning it out with the SAFC not making it richer

and no point running with a gutted cat unless you have a section of pipe put in there... just creates turbulance otherwise and no power gain

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
    • Motor and body mockup. Wheel fitment and ride height not set. Last pic shows front ride height after modifying the front uprights to make a 1.25" drop spindle.
    • Here's Logans Silvia with R32 Drivetrain, mine will be slightly lower (more angle). He was constantly blowing the RH axles at around 16deg. I want to avoid this.    
×
×
  • Create New...