Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK well i just got my car dynoed and here is the result. the mods are front mount intercooler, hks air filter, turbo back exaust with gutted cat, boost controller set to 10psi, SAFC, and a bosch 910 fuel pump,

also as u can see the car was dynoed at RE CUSTOMS and i cannot thank ray enough i recommend anyone wanting a tune or work done to head down there. i know ill be going back when i get a power fc which will hopefully be soon post-14524-1166431184.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147832-dyno-result-im-happy/
Share on other sites

nice man. nar mine is black i was there on friday aswell and he chucked my car on the dyno and then i got the bad news my fuel pump shit itself so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end car goes great im so pleased. calder on wednesday should be fun

nice man. nar mine is black i was there on friday aswell and he chucked my car on the dyno and then i got the bad news my fuel pump shit itself so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end car goes great im so pleased. calder on wednesday should be fun

fantastic - let us know how your car goes on wednesday..... yeah u might have seen my car there on friday (white s2 r33). welsh plugs gave way when they were doing hte service, so had to change all that - now its running great. Gonna get more mods done through them (the exhaust was done thru them)

That is a very high result for a fairly stock car. especially for only 10psi. I think the dyno is being a bit optamistic. Also your power curve is quite wonky in a couple of places. it might have been slipping on the dyno :P

this was mine with only a couple of mods - done at RE as well

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2753467

i could be wrong, but wouldnt the intercooler and the fuel pump increase the power output significantly?

That dyno reading is a joke, my car has the exact same mods and it sure as hell does NOT have 210kw at the wheels.

Somthing is wrong there.

With those mods id expect about 170rwkw.

cheers

your engine might be getting rather tired, or the dyno you went on under read to some extent (170kw is pretty low for those mods) and his over read to some extent.

for those mods i'd say about 190kw would be pretty accurate. remember that he does have a gutted cat.

ahh 170rwkw was just an estimate.

I havnt had my car dynod as yet but i hav those mods and im also putting on a batmbl front/drump pipe soon with a 5" body cat.

Haha pretty sure after i do that my clutch is sure to die a horrible death.

The only reason i didnt think i had that much power because i raced a mates stock 180 running 10 psi and he beat me by 1/2 a car length.

NOTE: race was conducted at appropriate race track

only way to find out if the power is correct is take the car down to the drags and compare the times/terminal(trap) speeds with others car of that power range.

no point comparing dynos.

my 2cents

My understanding behind shootout mode dynos, was to apply a correction so that most dynos could be compared. Now there is nothing wrong with the figures, as the correct mode was used and the air temps look right.

I am puting my money on either it running too lean, or you have a non-stock turbo in it (hi-flow / aftermarket).

Forget the figure, look at the power curve. something not right.

9 psi by 6h km/ph in 4th? looks like the operator held it on load untill he started the run. This is not really and indication on what the car will do on the street and will F96k up the peak torque figure.

Then there is a taper off and then an full 10 rwkw more at redline.

as long as the car holds boost correctly and the AFR's are safe the figure does not matter really. Still I have NEVER seen a car wth this level of mods produce more 190rwkw.

Glad you are happy with the result :(

Cheers!

yeah I have the same bs figure as well, 199rwkw before tune and 211rwkw after tune with a SAFC2. I must have gotten on a happy dyno as well, must get myself to a more moderate one to test out again, coz there's no way I'm gonna believe that. Although its fun bragging to people about it hahahahah

the only accurate way to compare timeslips from the track is to have the same person drive both cars. in a way they are like dyno readouts. 1 person may be a crap driver, but have more power and better tyres, suspension, etc, but still run a slower time at a slower speed than someone who can driver really well.

so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end

it should already be waaay rich with the new pump and stock ecu... he would have been leaning it out with the SAFC not making it richer

and no point running with a gutted cat unless you have a section of pipe put in there... just creates turbulance otherwise and no power gain

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...