Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The wiggle up top is because of the 4wd.

Wow thats quiet an increase....

Your right about the cams but you have to get the correctly match turbo for the engine's intensions.

I've only ever seen thoes sorts of gains with n2o in place.

Edited by cameron

Ok so I take it you won't tell us the specifics... but how about something general -

1) These types of gains, or even something "similarly comparable", are they "available" across the board provided you have some sort of hardware under the bonnet?

2) What should people take into consideration when making their "cam selection"?

3) What made you guys change from the old ones?

bout time paul :)

i dont want to speculate on the specs, so cant u just put us out of our miserie please :) (or just the big 2, engine capacity and turbo selection, or r u still running what u had planeed originally?)

We have have seen a silimar phenomena when fitting a larger inlet cam.

By going from a 264 to a 272 duration on the inlet and spending more time on the dyno adjusting cam timing, we were able to achieve earlier boost response, significantly better top end AND at a lower boost pressure. Both cams are now 272 STEP 2 HKS items.

gallery_705_63_5597.jpg

Other specs as per the RB26 Turbo Upgrade Sticky

another related weird power issue that i witnessed was with mark jacobson's car at autosalon, on an early run he wasnt making the power he thought the car had, so he played with the cam timing abit and on the next run picked up 200hp :)

i dont want to pull the head off so can jam bigger sticks in there :banana:

yes you do, remember u were just itching to get it off :banana:

i guess we have to wait til tomorrow for paul to post in here. oh how the wait is going to kill me :)

P.S i'll have a guess and say there in the vacinity of 10.xx lift and 27x duration, am i right? :)

Man thats so much difference it looks like it was done in 2 different gears.

Definately no funny business like that going on...ill make that quite clear.

But yes the result shocked even the builder and tuner.

yes you do, remember u were just itching to get it off :P

i guess we have to wait til tomorrow for paul to post in here. oh how the wait is going to kill me :laugh:

P.S i'll have a guess and say there in the vacinity of 10.xx lift and 27x duration, am i right? :laugh:

Bigger than that :(

bout time paul :laugh:

i dont want to speculate on the specs, so cant u just put us out of our miserie please :laugh: (or just the big 2, engine capacity and turbo selection, or r u still running what u had planeed originally?)

who said it was my engine...or car ?

while some would have been happy with the original result (BTW this is pump fuel and no NOS) , the end result was achieved due to the effort by the boys at Croydon's. Truely world class...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...