Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah, so I'm topic flooding today hehe

Anyways i'm trying to decide what to do next to my car performance wise

Currently i have a R34Neo turbo on my car, and it is fairly laggy and no very powerful. So i was wondering if i get it hi-flowed whether it will be even laggier, because any laggier and it would be useless off the strip in which case i'd get a 33 hi flowed or a 2530. I am also wondering how a 2530 compares to a hi flowed 33 or 34 neo turbo power wise? I know the prices are similar, although the 2530 are hard to find. Which should i go with? I was thinking of doing a rb25de transfer into this car but theres to many problems and i wanted it to be relatively original (+ the engine sounds so sweet)

Also im currently only making 163 rwkw (althought that was done before split dump and 3" Cat, i don't think these would make much difference) with these mods so with a hi flow or the 2530 i would expect to make about 190 rwkw, so my current AFM should be alright correct?

Dyno (dunno if it's helpful, maybe someone can see some problems)

mydynoqt5.png

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150396-2530-hi-flo-r33-or-hi-flo-r34-neo/
Share on other sites

Well... a hi-flow is larger wheels... so its going to be laggier.

If you class an R34 turbo as not so good on an RB20, then your really in no-mans land mate as it doesnt get any better in terms of response.

Its an RB20, so you need to wait for it to really come on.

R33/R34 hi-flows are virtually the same thing, 5-10rwkw difference really

Ah really, damn, just the thing doesn't start boosting till about 4k rpm and take off in first is horrible, i was assuming 2530 would be about the same lagginess because alot of people complain about laginess in the 34 turboes (most people with stock 33 turbo's on seem to get boost about 500-700rpm earlier than im getting)and the 2530's i haven't heard complaints about, humm, decisions decisions

I guess it depends on personal preference. one man's laggy is another man's response machine.

I've driven an rb20 with an r34 turbo before. It was definitely more laggier than the stock turbo, but I wouldn't exactly call it laggy in the scheme of things.

Highflowing ports out the housing, and fits bigger wheels, so it'll just make it laggier again.

most people say the 2530 is a good match to the rb20, but keep in mind, that it is subjective. Response of the 2530 will probably be similar or slightly laggier to what you've got on there now.

IMO (I ain't no guru, so feel free to post otherwise), the response of an r33/r34 highflow is similar to that of a 2530. The highflow is a little bit laggier, but it makes more power.

Check out the thread about all people's turbo results.

Yeh, the car has had a remap, but i dunno just scores low, so i was thinking 2530 i'd be looking at 190-ish seeing as im making 163 now (which judging from other people results is low)

After reading what other people are saying i think i will go 2530, and just drop some softer suspension in the back to make up for the increased lag

+ when i get my gtr in october, i will already be half way to twin 2530's >_<

Edited by 123456

Ah crap! Guess i'll just try get the N1 model.. I wanted to achieve high 11's on the GTR, duno if the N1 turboes on a rebuild with minor mods will do that and i can just sell the 2530 turbo instead.. Alternately i guess 2 high flowed 33 turboes wouldnt go on a gtr either?

well a r34 neo turbo on a r34 neo engine gets you full boost at like 2800rpm. don't think you can say the turbo on it's own is the whole problem.

you say the split pipe and hi flow cat won't make a big difference? i wouldn't agree there, especially if you have a catback. a full 3" system from turbo back would make a HUGE difference, in terms of power and responsiveness. On an r34 you're looking at about a 30rwkw difference, that's a lot.

ahhh... r34 neo turbo at 14psi..... WHAT THE??

How come none of the rest of you have commented on that f**ked up dyno graph?

Did Sam not give you any hints as to why it peaks so early?

What revs do you make the 14psi?

I'd be trying to figure out what's wrong with it now before changing turbos.

mythbusters ahoy;

gtr turbo flange is different to gtst turbo flange

gtr twin turbo's are smaller than gtst single turbo

gtr 2530s are not the same as single 2530 for gtst

14psi on an rb20 is not the same as 14psi on an rb25 neo

split dump wont make any difference to turbo response

Go and have a chat to Sam

really that turbo should hold all the way to 8000rpm and not run outta puff like the stock turbo, and around 4000rpm the show should be on.

especailly since youve added a larger cat, that makes a big big difference over a compliance one!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
×
×
  • Create New...