Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There is something that has always puzzled me. It seems almost like a double standard.

People on sau always say that it doeisn't matter that the intake piping gets hot, because the air passes throguh it so fast that it doesn't really get a chance to get heated up.

I totally agree that if you stop your car with an open pod, then yes, it will suck hot air in for a split second when you start moving again, but with our turbo cars, all the air under the bonnet will be refreshed in a split second once you start moving again, and it is actually sucking the air.

Once you're moving, all the air will constantly be refreshed, and if it is as sydneykid says that the air moves so quick that it deosn't really have a chance to get hot, then it should be fine.

Food for thought

Edited by MANWHORE
  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Post pics of your set up please Khunjeng

not finished yet mate. Started last week and havnt got it done. As in my post is says I'm runnign with a boxed pod setup atm. Hopefully in a week or so my fab. guys will have made it up.

but it will look like the stock units. Just slightly bigger lid and bigger snorkel. They made an r32 one last week that looked good so we copied it and made it a bit bigger.

As for the heating of pipes...I'm one for following the laws of thermodynamics. The transfer of heat is normally from a high temperature object to a lower temperature object. ie. ur hot pipe to the cold air. time is a factor but so are other things like thickness, temp difference etc. Its obvious some some thermal transfer occurs. How much and how much it effects ur output...dont know excactly but it must have an effect.

Something looks strange how its picked up so much more low end when clearly the stock airbox would not have been a restriction at such airflow levels.

Manwhore... You say the air refreshed... Where do you think the air passes through to get in to the engine bay.

The radiator. The radiator is designed to remove 80-90odd degree heat from the coolant and transfer the heat in to the air.

That heated air is then consumed by the motor.

. Alot of tuners these days tune on street without a dyno, and just checking everything else n dyno.

Where on earth did you get that idea, usually good tuners only do road tunes if they dont have a 4wd dyno, and are tuning an awd car, thats my experience from the 3 dyno shops ive worked at.

I would like to see the test repeated more than once to be conclusive, also a comparison of the boost between the two runs, i would be curious to find out why the afr's changed. Also where was the air temp sensor during the runs? I tend to agree with cubes, why did it make more power at low rpm where the airbox would not be a restriction? I would guess the boost was slightly different in the two runs.

I actually ran without the lid at the drags (R33 gtst) a number of years ago to test the lid 'off'. It was 2 mph slower on the terminal speed, slower through each of the traps at 660 and 100ft too. 102mph Vs 104 mph. Obviously sucking down lovely hot air.

The factory snorkel can be improved on like I said earlier. I ended up cutting a duct to the front part and made a cold air feed for it. Does bugger all having said all that.

Just so happens that I was at Hitmans the other day getting a tune and he pulled the cover off for the last run and got a 2kw increase from mid revs to top end.He reckons a pod would definately be better at a higher output.Bear in mind I have a cold air feed already set up from the old intercooler pipe hole in the guard going to the old air feed under the bonnet.I did this by cutting a hole in the underside of the lid scoop 3" in size.Then ran a heatproof pipe from the old intercooler hole to the new hole under the factory air feed and used a hose clamp both ends.Works great as I know the standard air box can lose 5kws.

Yea but the underside of the R33 Air box is "filtered" air section meaning if you put a 3" induction pipe there it will bypass the airfilter...

The only viable method would be to increase the top lid's intake like this:

post-23753-1169884640.jpg

post-23753-1169884666.jpg

post-23753-1169884679.jpg

What you think?

Regards,

Sarkis

Just so happens that I was at Hitmans the other day getting a tune and he pulled the cover off for the last run and got a 2kw increase from mid revs to top end.He reckons a pod would definately be better at a higher output.Bear in mind I have a cold air feed already set up from the old intercooler pipe hole in the guard going to the old air feed under the bonnet.I did this by cutting a hole in the underside of the lid scoop 3" in size.Then ran a heatproof pipe from the old intercooler hole to the new hole under the factory air feed and used a hose clamp both ends.Works great as I know the standard air box can lose 5kws.

Bonnet down or up on that one?

My idea is to have a 2.5 inch hole in the side of the airbox and run flexitubing down through the spare intercooler hole and have a pod filter and a shroud around it to guide the air as well as having a panel filter up the top.

I'm also planing to make the air box a larger volume by making the box square at the bottom rather than indented. I going to get it plastic welded and this also moves the postion of the air flow meter and makes it easier to fabricate a stainless intake pipe.

this is wat i did..

from my 'sticking my hand in and feeling the temps' test the air inside the airbox and around the front is cooler than the air inside the snorkel. i use the stock intercooler pipes still so i think they block some of the air like a partition type thing..

also i rekon on the s2's the grill blocks to much airflow, theres no gaps or anything in it.

post-19018-1169892828.jpg

Justin - The problem with your method is that it still sucks hot air in... the CAI snorkel must be 100% sealed and have a direct air feed from outside the engine bay... The R32 airbox can have the easiest CAI setup due to the AFM sucking from the lid leaving the the bottom part in direct acess with the SMIC hole...

Dezz - I have had a look and our idea will work... just need to figure out what materials to use...

Cheers

Justin - The problem with your method is that it still sucks hot air in... the CAI snorkel must be 100% sealed and have a direct air feed from outside the engine bay... The R32 airbox can have the easiest CAI setup due to the AFM sucking from the lid leaving the the bottom part in direct acess with the SMIC hole...

Dezz - I have had a look and our idea will work... just need to figure out what materials to use...

Cheers

The same plastic used for the factory snorkel... Personally i'd want something fabricated by a pro, so it keeps the factory look... Maybe someone like SS inductions (they make a lot of intake stuff for holdens and fords) could make something up

Just to clarify...

That was open botten with the fan when you did the B&A yer?

If so, did you happen to do a a run with is closed... well... ideally it would be:

3 runs with snorkel, 3 runs without.

That would be interesting

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...