Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For the sump adapter plate i will be asking around $400 for the plate, the you will have to drill some holes and tap thread the adapter plate around another $100 for a machining shop a have aluminium lugs welded to your sump to remove to studs to change to longer bolts which will probably cost a further $100. Im selling the plates basically at cost plus aroun 80 for developement cost as i wasted around $800 worth of 10mm cadium plated mild steel working it all out and fitting it perfectly. If people are interested they can PM and if they buy one i will provide accurate and detailed instructions on what to do!!! Thanks

I just like the idea of not having to worry about a worn belt letting go, or a tensioner bearing bolt snapping to blow my motor. I reckon around 80,000 is a good time...hell why not 50,000 kms when the two tensioners + belt comes to $220 for a major service.. :cheers:

If you are worried about pistons contacting valves just sit your head on with the gasket in place and put a piece of plastacein on your valve and rotate your engine and pull the head off to check the thickness of the plastacein. I am pretty sure it will clear. So if you break a belt It will not damage your engine. Just a thought to give you piece of mind.

Gilly

Ben,

I gave Shaun a buzz.

15mm on the drivers side.

12mm on the passenger side.

----

I've chosen a turbo.

GT35R BB with a custom .82 exhaust a/r that has a flange in the scroll to allow the bolt up of a external gate. This way I don't have the extra expense of a custom exhaust manifold. Power difference..

With this exhaust a/r it made 306rwkw on 18-19psi with all the boost in before 4000rpm on a RB30DET. ~1bar at 3500rpm.

I am thinking of getting the exhaust housing powerported or also known as extrude honed to help increase spool rate and power a little.

Generally a good power port with reduce spool by around 200-300rpm so I've been told.

Hopefully it works well..

Now to wait for the exhaust housing to land at my door step then off to buy the core/cover.

Good thing I didn't buy GTR injectors. :)

what did that set u back joel?

and what size wastegate u planning on useing?

I've yet to work out the size I need.

I am aiming for around 20psi absolute max, now to dig up SK's airflow calc's to determine the size required. :)

I am going to try and have a 180degree bend in the wastegate pipe from the turbo and place the wastegate under the turbo with it joining back up from the underneath of the dump/front pipe.

It looks like it will all fit by my measurements.

Then I will make up a nice little exhaust shield and hopefully manage to hide it. I will get the exhaust shield painted black to give it a little more stealth.

The exhaust housing is second hand & has already been machined up so its costing me $100. Sounds like a decent price. Whats $100 compared to everything else. lol.

yeh...

but my "GONNA DO" plan was to do the 120 degree bend from throttle option.

I think that will still fit..

120degree bend won't fit. It really is much closer than you realise.

Stick a bit of stiff hose in the engine bay so it is relatively tight. Close the bonnet and measure the distance you have at the front of the plenum.

Then tack on another 38mm for the extra deck height and minus around 14mm.

You will find you have around 2cm's clearance from the front top of the plenum.

Then watch the bonnet slope down towards the front of the car. You will not fit a pipe over the top of the motor at that point. Maybe a 1" pipe. :P

Standard exhaust manifold... :D

Apparently the .82 starts to limit power up over 320rwkw.

Using a 1.01 rear housing I've heard of the GT35R making around 290rwkw on close to 25psi.

The GT35R .82a/r is rated at 620hp, 1.01a/r is rated at 700hp.

Cubes that exhaust housing looks very like some of the large series TO4's I've seen around .

Sorry to be negative but the genuine GT35R turbine housings have a different shaped passage , to better suit the greater tip hight "paddle wheel" style GT turbines . RS500 had a post ages ago about the downside of using TO4 housings with GT series turbines .

A fellow I know used to weld external gate fittings onto FJ20 and RB30ET exhaust manifolds so maybe this could be done to an RB20/25 exhaust manifold .

Good luck anyway cheers A .

I was told it isn't really a 'performance' housing but has made 306rwkw on 18-19psi with 1bar by around 3500rpm. (spool is subjective)

Moving from this housing to a custom exhaust manifold & garret housing picked up ~20rwkw.

The GT35 compressor map suggests 19psi is around the mark to be making 306rwkw (490fwhp) with a 90% VE.

Big cams etc will obviously increase VE and reduce the boost required to flow the same amount of airflow.

The housing will do for now until I get a custom exhaust manifold made up the way I want (ext. gate underneath with stock turbo positioning). :P

For $100 it will make some decent power fairly easy without having the extra expense at this very moment for an external gate.

I may find I want to step down an exhaust a/r as I am not going to play with aftermarket cams so reversion won't be an issue.

The 3ltr making 20psi by 3000rpm (assumed with a .62a/r) is only just to the right of the surge line.

Should be a good experiment. :)

This "power porting" i've heard of it before but didnt know what were the benefits. From what I've been told a fluid with fine sand is pumped through the housing, not sure if its the exhaust or comp housing but it increases flow.

Has anyone had this done before?, from what Joel is saying it sounds like the first step in lowering the spool up time. Hrmm 200-300 rpm....:aroused:

About the wastegate location.

I have seen RB30ET's with the external wastegate welded to the exhaust housing of the turbo, would this give better response and/ or do damage to the turbo?

My ss exh manifold's external wastegate plumbing needs to be bigger in diameter, i'm looking for the cheapest option but a safe one.

Sorry to be steering away from rb30's but questions outside this thread dont seem to get the same amount of attention.

This "power porting" i've heard of it before but didnt know what were the benefits. From what I've been told a fluid with fine sand is pumped through the housing, not sure if its the exhaust or comp housing but it increases flow.

Has anyone had this done before?, from what Joel is saying it sounds like the first step in lowering the spool up time. Hrmm 200-300 rpm....:aroused:

About the wastegate location.

I have seen RB30ET's with the external wastegate welded to the exhaust housing of the turbo, would this give better response and/ or do damage to the turbo?

My ss exh manifold's external wastegate plumbing needs to be bigger in diameter, i'm looking for the cheapest option but a safe one.

Sorry to be steering away from rb30's but questions outside this thread dont seem to get the same amount of attention.

You can basically power port anything, inlet manifolds, exhaust manifolds, dump pipes, intercooler pipework etc etc.

Wastegate positioning and plumbing is a very exact science, welding it to the exhaust housing is a cheap compromise. There are simply better ways.:rofl:

You can basically power port anything, inlet manifolds, exhaust manifolds, dump pipes, intercooler pipework etc etc.

Wastegate positioning and plumbing is a very exact science, welding it to the exhaust housing is a cheap compromise.  There are simply better ways.:)

Cheers for the speedy reply, always on the ball :rofl:

So if going down the power porting route for the turbo, it would be better to get both sides done? (GT35R .86 exh)

Would there be much benefit in power porting the standard 25 inlet manifold, i'm referring to the bottom half. Would this affect the low down torque?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...