Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Joel ... this is from the tomei website

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/_2003web-catalogu...l-lub_rset.html

says at the bottom that the restrictors should only be used on the RB25 when using solid lifters, and not with lash type...

thoughts?

Joel ... this is from the tomei website

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/_2003web-catalogu...l-lub_rset.html

says at the bottom that the restrictors should only be used on the RB25 when using solid lifters, and not with lash type...

thoughts?

Well we know the lash type require oil pressure cause they are hydraulic dependant for their movement. But you wouldnt think it would starve them of oil by decreasing the flow. We would be effectively increasing the pressure by reducing the feeds size.

Ok so they fit all but reccomended for only solid type...well that doesnt help the situation ;)

Edited by r33_racer

Hi guys , I would not be ordering a small parallel brass bung from Japan with a 1.5mm (60 thou) hole in it . If you are lucky the basic OD of the thing will very likely be a std brass rod size and only need drilling to size parting off and de burring . Any machine shop could make these for you very easily though you may want more than two to make it worth their while . Actually just had a thought , Nissan L series engines use a similar type of in block head oil restrictor and its just possible that it could fit and work if the ID/OD is suitable .

We have the technology here cheers A .

Bl4ck32,

See how yours goes.. Next time its on the dyno and shaun's gave it a big run quickly unscrew the oil filler cap. My rocker covers were definitely fullish.

Sky30 I believe ran the stock rb30 1.8mm size with an rb20t pump and still wasn't completely happy, I believe he too is looking at going smaller.

Thanks for the obvious tip Discopotato03, I didn't think of such an obvious easy fix (brass rod). ;)

Joel ... this is from the tomei website

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/_2003web-catalogu...l-lub_rset.html

says at the bottom that the restrictors should only be used on the RB25 when using solid lifters, and not with lash type...

Do remember the rb30 block doesn't run piston oil squirters so in the case of the rb30det, its not that simple to know.

Mine... There's simply too much oil in the head with my setup.

Being...

Rb25det oil pump

R32 non-vct rb25 head

Standard rb20/25 2.4mm restrictors

no piston oil squirters

honed block oil return.

I require smaller oil restrictors. :)

The way I look at it is if there's enough oil for 1 x 1.5mm restrictor to feed the rb26 head + keep the valve springs cool + lube the cam lobes and cam bearings then 2 x 1.5mm restrictors is going to be plenty. ;)

is that 2x0.75 per bank?

when i take the head off the RB30 on monday i'll measure the feed and see what size it is, would have to be pretty spot on for the copper rod to go in there right? like only just fit...

Joel, are you saying that there is more pressure going to the head, since there are no piston squirters to reduce the pressure in the system?

No its only 2 x .75mm per head. :)

Same as how we run 2 x 2.4mm or 2 x 1.8mm (rb30).

You will need to obviously measure the od diamater, punch the old one down as it won't be coming out too easy. :)

---

RE: no oil squirters.

I don't completely understand how decreasing oil flow to the head will increase oil flow or pressure to the main bearings based on the fact that all oil pumps run an internal bypass. Say pressure reaches 100psi, the oil pumps spring bypass opens up and prevents any more pressure being made.

I obviously dont understand the mechanics of it as logic would tell me that if I were to increase the heads oil restrictor size then the oil pump would be flowing more oil to create the same pressure, decrease the heads oil restrictor and the pump would be flowing less to create the same oil pressure.

A smaller head restrictor you may notice higher oil pressure lower in the rpm range which is a good thing with the rb30 as higher power (which is what the rb30 does lower in the rpm) requires higher oil pressure.

All I can see running a smaller restrictor doing is leaving more oil in the sump, less in the head, less chances of lifter pump up, less blowby, not really feeding more oil to the bearings UNLESS the heads restrictor was so big it was preventing the bearings from seeing very little oil pressure due to the oil pump never hitting its internal bypass, which in this case I doubt. I am thinking too much. Don't need to. :P

RE: Patrol RB30

As far as I'm aware they are the same RB30E SOHC.

hi all. this WASN'T covered in this thread (actually used the search :) )....are any of you familiar with the RB30 used in a nissan patrol? think it came carbed. Can this engine be used? thank you

What is it exactly that you want to know?

Let me try a few guesses...............

Was there an RB30 used in Patrols? Yes

Is it the same as RB30 used in Commondoors and and Skylines? Yes

Does it have oil squirters? No

Is it a 4wd block? No

Are they cheaper than Commondoor RB30? No

Are there more of them than Commodoor RB30? No

Are they rare? Yes

Would I bother searching out for one? No

Hopefully one of those answered your question.

:P Cheers :laugh:

Edited by Sydneykid
I know of a couple people that have T'd in to the turbo oil return, they are having no problems.

I know of one person have problems and they are T'd in to the return. It could very well be something else, they are running the N1 high pressure oil pump without modification of oil restrictors. Possibly the real issue.

The problem is the oil from the turbo is rather frothy, it is whipped by the ball bearings and the high revs (<200,000 rpm). So feeding un-aerated oil from the cylinder head return into an already aerated mix is not something I would recommend. The flow would be interrupted and the return would not function as well as it needs to. The ball bearing turbo has restricted oil feed going to it, however notice how large the oil return is. That is to allow for the aerated oil, which has much greater volume than the oil on its own.

That’s why we always have the external oil return from the cylinder head going into the top of the LHS sump wing. Never T’d into the turbo oil return.

I don’t ever use plain bearing turbos, so I don’t know whether they would be any different.

:) cheers :P

Cheerz Gary..

Some one in the know. :dry:

Any chance you would have an opinion on the oil restrictors?

There are 3 answers, all previously posted;

RB26 cylinder head= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 1.5 mm restrictor in the other

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings, not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

RB25 with VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 1.5 mm restrictor in the other

Plus leave the VVT oil feed as per standard

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings and VVT actuator but not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

RB25 without VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 2.0 mm restrictor in the other

Plus block off the VVT oil feed

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings, no VVT actuator. Not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

Hope that was of some help

:P cheers :P

RB25 without VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 2.0 mm restrictor in the other

Plus block off the VVT oil feed

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings, no VVT actuator. Not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

Hope that was of some help

:dry: cheers :P

Let me make sure I've got this...

The RB25DET with VVT Disabled.

You run one 2mm oil restrictor as the RB26 does standard and you also block of the VVT oil feed.

Resulting in exactly the same standard setup as the RB26.

So... Myself running a R32 RB25DE head. If it was yours you would block off one of the oil feeds and run 1 2mm feed.

So if I were to run 2 x 1.5's that would still be more than you have suggest for a non vvt head.

I'll add to this my experiences.......

RB30 with R33 25 head. VCT enabled.

On the oil drain issue - head oil return is plumbed into the turbo oil return. Engine has been in and running for nearly 18 months without issue.

On the oil restrictors - I originally built the engine with 2 x 2.4mm restrictors plus the 1.2mm or whatever the VCT is. I had heaps of oil out the breathers if i maintained 4000rpm+ for 5 seconds or more.

About 4 months ago i purchased 2 x 1.5mm Tomei restrictors from Greenline. Punched the old ones down and put the 1.5's on top. So yes they fit the RB30. Oil blown out the breathers is now virtually nil. I did get a little (200ml) after a maintained high speed/rev run but otherwise i haven't checked the catch can since.

Edited by MonstaS4

Awesome MonstaS4,

The two 1.5mm items with non vct should work well. :D

Its always a little iffy when trying new things that really no one (well at least you think there is no one) has had experience with.

One question, which oil pump are you using?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...