Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

RE: Patrol RB30

As far as I'm aware they are the same RB30E SOHC.

What is it exactly that you want to know?

Let me try a few guesses...............

Was there an RB30 used in Patrols? Yes

Is it the same as RB30 used in Commondoors and and Skylines? Yes

Does it have oil squirters? No

Is it a 4wd block? No

Are they cheaper than Commondoor RB30? No

Are there more of them than Commodoor RB30? No

Are they rare? Yes

Would I bother searching out for one? No

Hopefully one of those answered your question.

:) Cheers :yes:

excellent ..wow..thanks both I knew if i couldnt find out here then NO ONE would know...once again SAU ....u never let me down.

The reason i ask SydneyKid (Gary?) is because im not in Australia...I'm in Jamaica...if i ask someone to source me RB30 from a GTS they're likely to want to jackup the price on me because of the even the phrase Sk-...if i tell em oh get an old nissan patrol 3.0 carbed engine....they might not be so greedy :) . If they have none here..am I likely to find the RB30e in Japan?

wow respect again for the info. You guys ever think about writing a skyline bible :P

*For R32/R33 with VCT blocked off:

Sydneykid says use a 2.0mm restrictor and block the other one off.

Cubes wants to use 2x 1.5mm holes

If the RB30 has 2x 1.8mm holes, I wonder if only 1x1.8mm hole was

used whether it would be enough???

*For R33 with VCT working:

Sydneykid uses 1x 1.5mm hole and the standard VCT port

MonstaS4 uses 2x 1.5mm holes and the standard VCT port

All that happens if you dont use them is more (too much?) oil gets pumped into the head than is needed when it is better off in the sump!

Edited by VHR32

thanks for all the info guys and good timing to as i am just finishing getting all the parts togewther for mine.

do we have a similar summary for oil pumps and which is the recommended one except for the rb26 n1's and aftermarkerts. eg rb30e, rb30et, rb20de, rb20det etc etc

I'll add to this my experiences.......

RB30 with R33 25 head. VCT enabled.

On the oil drain issue - head oil return is plumbed into the turbo oil return. Engine has been in and running for nearly 18 months without issue.

On the oil restrictors - I originally built the engine with 2 x 2.4mm restrictors plus the 1.2mm or whatever the VCT is. I had heaps of oil out the breathers if i maintained 4000rpm+ for 5 seconds or more.

About 4 months ago i purchased 2 x 1.5mm Tomei restrictors from Greenline. Punched the old ones down and put the 1.5's on top. So yes they fit the RB30. Oil blown out the breathers is now virtually nil. I did get a little (200ml) after a maintained high speed/rev run but otherwise i haven't checked the catch can since.

1 X 2 mm restrictor = same oil flow as 2 X 1.4 mm restrictors

2 X 1.5 mm restrictors = 12% more oil flow than 1 X 2 mm restrictor

The 12% extra flow is why you get oil in the catch can

Hence why we use 1 X 2 mm restrictor, as our cars see lots of continuous high rpm

Also why I don't recommend plumbing the cylinder head external oil feed into the turbo oil return. Driving around town it doesn't matter, but continuous high rpm and it does.

:O cheers :devil:

PS; (for others) the restrictors go in the block not the head.

1. sydneykid when would you consider it worthwhile to do this (oil restrictors). at what power level etc

can you also give me some advice on what size external wastegate would be required for 20/25psi boost. some people say a 38 is mine however others say 40/45 is needed.

would you reccomend cam gears to be done as part of the engine if im doing the forged pistons you reccomended. i presume you get hundreds of pms but we talked re a t66, any luck on pricing?

Suggestions follow;

1. Power level is irrelevant, it's all about how many rpm you use and for how long (continuously) you use that rpm.

2. Some time ago I published the formula that we use for sizing wastegates. I then compared the results from using that formula with over 40 wastegate sizes done by many turbo and other workshops around the country. The results confirmed the accuracy of the formula, with over 90% alignment.

Airflow in lbs per minute = diameter of wastegate in mm X boost correction factor

Let’s use the formula on my own RB31DET

The target is 450 rwkw at 2 bar

450 rwkw = 700 bhp

700 bhp = 70 lbs per minute of airflow = 70 mm (if I was using 19 psi)

I am using 30 psi, so we need to apply the boost correction

70 / 30 X 19 = 44.3 mm

GCG recommended a 44 mm Tial wastegate based on their experience.

This the original thread if you want more details;

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=43638

3. PM me about the turbo, there are a few alternatives with the new releases of aerodynamics from the T04Z work.

:) Cheers ;)

Edited by Sydneykid

thanks for your information sydneykid. all your information regarding everything is absolutely invaluable. id hate to know how many engines have been successfully built with some of your information.

im glad i read this thread as my engine would have otherwise been assembled without the restrictors and i probably would have gone with the bigger is better idea rather than listening to any form of reasoning in respect to the wastegate.

where is a place (other than greenline) that you would know of that would stock these restrictors, or is it simply a case of someone being able to fabricate them?

at present my blocks in pieces as is the head waiting to be sent off for some boring. when i get that back ill assemble it all and get back to you regarding a few questions then we can talk turbo. i look forward to it.

As I mentioned earlier..

Hi Octane Racing Australia

www.hioctaneracing.com.au

$15 each inc. gst + postage.

thanks for that

i read in an earlier thread that you were looking at doing gtr valve springs. i was looking at doing the same then read they also werent all that great.

i then called kelford camtech(im in nz) who do most of the countries top head work. they mentioned there are 3 types of valve springs for the rb25 head which i found interesting. they are 10 dollars dearer than the gtr items from nissan.

they are made by an australian company called performance springs and the quality is meant to be very high.

anyone got any comments on how many kws on a 300 kw engine can be made by cam gears finely adjusting the cams?

anyo

Edited by SirRacer

I've been told to steer clear of aftermarket aussy valve springs by many.

Allen engineering, Chris Milton Engineering and Boostworx to name a few.

I was told to either go s/h gtr springs and have them tested or grab a set of aftermarkets from japan.

I went the s/h low km R33 gtr valve springs. Cost bugger all and are all perfect. :rolleyes:

can someone confrim the sentance below re head bolts

"Use a set of 10mm standard RB25DE head bolts. They fit the RB30 block and are the correct length for the GTR head."

i dont want to retap the block until i rebuild it

pete

Edited by fatz

i know the rb25det head bolts go into the rb30 block..i would assume the rb25de ones are identical. 10mm x 1.5P or 1.25P not sure its probably the later being its going into steel so a fine thread is probably ok. Without checking, my money is on 10mm X 1.25P.

I believe next metric size up is the 12mm bolts which are called half inch. So if your gonna retap it, are you gonna oversize to half inch?

I dont know if the rb25de/t head bolts will work with a gtr head. I would say you would just use the ones that came off that head as its the height of the head that matters..so long as the thread size and pitch is the same you should be laughing.

Question for your question, Doesnt rb26 use half inch head bolts/studs anyway? Isnt that why you have to drill and tap out the block to suit the 26's larger headbolts? A 10mm in a 12mm would leave alot of slop.

iI believe next metric size up is the 12mm bolts which are called half inch. So if your gonna retap it, are you gonna oversize to half inch?

RB20/25/30 = 11 mm

RB26 = 12 mm

There are 12.7 mm (1/2"), it's a common size for small block V8's = cheap

:D cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid

ahh so half inch studs/bolts actually are close to half inch..not just closest metric equivalent full value.

I swear someone called the 12mm head bolts/studs half inch even though half inch is 12.7mm.

Isnt 11mm an odd size since most bolts and studs come in multiples of 2 unless you go relatively small.

ahh so half inch studs/bolts actually are close to half inch..not just closest metric equivalent full value.

I swear someone called the 12mm head bolts/studs half inch even though half inch is 12.7mm.

Isnt 11mm an odd size since most bolts and studs come in multiples of 2 unless you go relatively small.

Yep, that's why the 11 mm studs are expensive compared to 1/2". The 12mm ones are expensive because they have RB26 written on the box.

:D cheers :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...