Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

me neither :-)

I sell two types now for RB30. the original design and a PHAT rod for serious power.

PHAT'S are heavier but they have a thicker beam, more steel around the bolt area and across the bottom cap.

Ive used both and cant really distinguish any noticable difference in response.

Anyway thats my two cents worth

hmm so we switched the turbine housing over to the modified one by kyle and it holds boost perfectly now with no fluctuations, however its not making power. Before when it was spiking, it was making 290kw now its down to 220kw.

I tell ya i feel like driving the whole race car straight into the brisbane river and letting it sink...starting from scratch, then i can use a 32 like i originally wanted.

Oh Brad did you get my message last night?

Edited by r33_racer

Problem solved.

Looks like the cat or middle muffler has collapsed and blocked most of the exhaust.

Got it to 1 bar after I dropped the exhaust at the dump pipe flange and went for a blat up the street.

Whoo hoo, now to just replace the cat or muffler and back to the dyno.

Think Ill have a few beers tonight.

Hey Spool, you got any specials on your RB30 CP pistons coming up? have the 9:1's got a 6cc dome? My 26 head seems to have 65.5cc. It would seem that using flat tops would give me a comp ratio of 7.88:1 with a .0 deck height, 1.2mm head gasket, 0.5mm oversize. taking the 6cc dome of the 9:1's (if im right) I would actually end up with 8.5:1. Any extra info would be good.

Thanks, Matt

Edited by Godzilla33

Hi Matt

From memory _ I will confirm. The CP's have an 11cc dome on their 9.0:1 pistons.

Ill also calculate your comp from the figure you have given and see what we turn out.

Cheers

Hey Spool, you got any specials on your RB30 CP pistons coming up? have the 9:1's got a 6cc dome? My 26 head seems to have 65.5cc. It would seem that using flat tops would give me a comp ratio of 7.88:1 with a .0 deck height, 1.2mm head gasket, 0.5mm oversize. taking the 6cc dome of the 9:1's (if im right) I would actually end up with 8.5:1. Any extra info would be good.

Thanks, Matt

assuming your head gasket is 87mm in diameter , and using the other figures you have given.

1.2mm gasket

86.5mm bore

11cc dome

65.5 cc combustion chamber

you will get 9.1:0 with the cp 9.0:1 piston

Your calculations using the 6cc dome are correct though.

Thanks for the info, just using the std RB26 head gasket (think its actually 1.28mm) gasket is pretty close to 87mm I think, planning on O ringing. Think I might stick with the flat tops to be safe.

From memory _ I will confirm. The CP's have an 11cc dome on their 9.0:1 pistons.

Gday Spool,

Hmmmm I got an email from QRI and they assured me CP 9.0 were 6cc dome?!

I thought you would be the best person to ask!

Arias apparently have a 13cc dome on one of their pistons which would make even higher c/r :wave:

I had a quiet day at work today so did a bit of emailing and ringing around to find out about pistons....

CP Quantum Racing Industries

All compression ratios are based on zero deck height, 1.2mm head gasket (7.13cc), RB25 @ 62.5cc, RB26 @ 64.5cc. They assure me they have done alot of work to make sure the facts are correct.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20

Flat top with no valve pockets

8.2:1 compression with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20-9.0

6.0cc dome top,

9.0:1 compression with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

*Care must be taken when using on RB26 with more than 11.5mm valve lift*

Also, I thought with RB30ET std 7.8:1 pistons the c/r with a R33 RB25 head is about 7.1:1, so using 8.5:1 (quoted off the ACL website) ACL forgies might make it approx 7.8:1?

Even if the R34 NEO head has smaller chambers, it surely does it reallywork out to be 8.5:1?!?

Or was it all CC'd?

Edited by VHR32

I have the chance to buy a GT30 .82 with custom wheels in it, which apparently made 367rwKw @ 24psi boost (C16) on a RB25.

I'm aiming for 350rwKw on 98 fuel.

Would this be a bit on the small side on a RB30/26 street/track car??

Have a good look around here...

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...bochargers.html

GT30R is listed as GT3076r

GT35R is listed as GT3582r

Have a look at their wheel sizes. The multiple listings of the same GT3076r and gt3582r is off the top of my head just different turbine housing configs (T4, T3 4 bolt etc etc).

Like I said - it was from memory. You could be correct. I think I have a set here, Ill check them and also ring Quantum on Monday to confirm for you ( and me ).

Gday Spool,

Hmmmm I got an email from QRI and they assured me CP 9.0 were 6cc dome?!

I thought you would be the best person to ask!

Arias apparently have a 13cc dome on one of their pistons which would make even higher c/r :)

The NEO head is approx 10cc smaller than the R33 ( I cant remember the exact cc's - I should keep all this info somewhere ). The head was also surfaced when reconditioned and ported, so that decreases the comb chamber a little also.

I cc'd everything when I built my engine, combustion chamber, piston valve reliefs, etc

Also, I thought with RB30ET std 7.8:1 pistons the c/r with a R33 RB25 head is about 7.1:1, so using 8.5:1 (quoted off the ACL website) ACL forgies might make it approx 7.8:1?

Even if the R34 NEO head has smaller chambers, it surely does it reallywork out to be 8.5:1?!?

Or was it all CC'd?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...