Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thats a really interesting point lowlux - I was just reading tonight in a book called '21st century performance' where they were comparing variable cam timing and different cam profiles - and guess what - with larger profile cams the vvt made no gain at all, this was on a lexus v8 I think - the book is at work so I cant look it up at the moment. Cant remeber the cam profiles either - sorry.

Has anybody experimented with aftermarket cams and VVT?

Hi All

after alot of ISSUES the rb30 twin cam turbo is alive.seems to be a problem with the VVt as about 5000rpm it stuters and coughs

due to $$$$cost the standard turbo,injectors and ecu have had to make do for the time being.

the rb30 block is also standard NA internals ,all seems well

can anyone suggest a safe boost pressure to run it at?

thanks to this topic/post it has been possible for me to do this conversion ,much appreciation goes out to all who added to it.

now to find a dyno and get a checkup.

cheers

Well you should be running a cr of around 8.3:1. So boost isn't a problem but the ceramic exhaust wheel is.

Due to the extra capacity the turbo now has to spin faster more rpm to keep the same boost pressure as when it was 500cc less.

SO running 1 bar would be like maybe running 16-17psi on a Rb25det.

So be carefull with the ceramic exhaust wheel.. Maybe run 12psi through it max just to be safe.

So how does the off boost torque feel compared to the RB25?

Post us some pics ;)

25t, just to re-cap. You have a R33 with a VVT RB25DET, you changed the bottom end to a stock RB30 without changing any other support systems... Correct?

How does it run, other than the stutter? Does boost come on much faster? Does it feel a lot more torquey?

You could adjust the base timeing for more advance becuase the CR has droped a fair bit, and like joel said, you could run a heap more boost becuse of the lower CR, but the turbo will not like it at all.

HI Guys, I have seen a number of mentions of the VVT change over point being at 5,000 rpm. If your ECU has an adjustable change over point then this is the way we do it.

We run the car up on the dyno with the VVT locked in the "low rpm" position and save the power graph. We then lock VVT in "high rpm" position and also save the power graph. We then overlay the 2 graphs. Where the 2 power curves cross over is the most efficient position for the VVT change over point to be. So we set the ECU to change over at that rpm.

Hope that helps.

Hi all

as suggested i have advanced the timeing to 20deg, made a huge diffrence ,no stuters anymore

just to confirm ,this motor was built with the lowest cost in mind

all 25t parts that could be used were, oil pump,water pump,oil cooler etc

VVt has been retained with the use of a oil hose from the rb30 oil pressure sender port which was plummed into the vvt feed gallery as per a link Joel posted a few pages back.

the rb30 block was given rings and bearings(not needed) as it was the correct thing to do while it was in bits.the RB30 only cost $200 complete

I tried to install the rb25 piston squirtersinto the rb30 block(disaster) the oil gallery casting is too thin and when installed the squiters restricted oil flow to the mains and bigends,a post from Sydney kid stated that the squirters were not necessary so i capped the holes.

the motor feels stronger/torquey across the rev range and running 6psi boost feels like the 25t did with 12psi.

the only other issue worthy of noteing is the bonnet only just closes ,sadley the strut brace has had to be left off. I guess there is always some tradeoffs

cheers

That's a great job 25t, someone brave enough to do a straight, low budget swap of components. I am looking forward to seeing some dyno numbers.

Hi GiJOr33, the VVT changes the timing of the inlet camshaft under instructions from the ECU. So you can have advanced timing for more power at high rpm and retarded timing for more power at low rpm. An adjustable pulley gives one or the other, not both. I would not worry about adding VVT if it was not already there, but if it is why not use it?

Hope that helps

25t, so was it worth the effort and money? How much did it all add up to? A list of what was done vs cost would be great. Do you have any 400m times or dyno charts from before the conversion, a before and after comparison would be good. Does it still rev strongly to 7000rpm?

Have you driven it enough to notice the fuel consumption?

Hi Dennis/all

ive never been down a drag strip ,so i dont know a time,at the moment with the boost set low 6psi its as quick as the 25t was with the boost up at 12psi.

its not been driven very hard yet as its only done 250ks

comsumption seems to be about the same as the original rb25 ,im guessing but the ECU still thinks its 2.5ltrs so the fueling etc is as if it was 2.5ltr ,as soon as the boost is on they run rich anyway?

Sydney kid ,when i get to a Dyno what are the basic things i should be getting checked/changed?

costs =

rb30 motor $200

rings/bearings $200

gaskets/lipseals $100

acid bath,gallery brush,frost plugs$50

oil hose/fittings for VVT $100

cheers

25t ... have you got a pic of the VVT fittings? i had a look back through the thread (and a long thread at that) and didn't see it. I'm keen to see how you've set it up. I've been having a chat with Sydneykid about it and he reckons that you can just ditch the VVT and get an adjustable cam gear for the exhaust side. But i like to see what others have experienced too. I've got forged pistons and stronger rods, with a big turbo... so it will probably be more beneficial to change the cam timing rather than keep the VVT.

Congrats 25t. It'll be nice to see some figures as im looking to do a budget conversion aswell....not too budget but that all depends on how much i sell the calais for :P

You were saying that the bonnet just closed, how would this conversion go with a R32 then? Are the engine bays different size?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
×
×
  • Create New...