Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

is that maxing the turbo out? anyone on here selling 25det gearbox by any chance? and another question? are the 26dett gearboxes able t be modified to run on a rwd car?

Edited by Redliner007
is that maxing the turbo out? anyone on here selling 25det gearbox by any chance? and another question? are the 26dett gearboxes able t be modified to run on a rwd car?

There's a search button for a reason, all of these questions have been answered before.

There's a search button for a reason, all of these questions have been answered before.

well i cant seem to find anything about 26 gearbox being used on rwd cars? sorry if im being a neusence, just want to do things right with out sitting in front of the comp all night thats all

well i cant seem to find anything about 26 gearbox being used on rwd cars?

Im doing one myself

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...-A-t213779.html

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...amp;hl=transfer

Every Rb30 question has been answered more than twice in this thread, take the time to read every page and digest the info.

When your done reading this thread theres 44 topics to read in the Rb30 conversions sub forum. http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/RB...sions-f184.html

Edited by Alf

The R32 head is fine for 300rwkw. R33 if your going to push 400rwkw.

The GT3076 .8 rear .6 port shroud comp can be squeezed to 320rwkw with pair of cams. Mine has made 268rwkw on 15psi and 285rwkw on 17psi. Didn't appear to make a great deal after that as we suspect one of the following resulting in a tooth up/down see saw top end:

* The 232 duration exhaust cam was causing a little problem letting the exh gas out

* Some funky ignition break down began setting in (as there was a fair bit of unburnt fuel around when there shouldn't have been)

* Onset of valve float

Waiting for a set of 264 advertised 221degree @ 0.050" 9mm lift cams should be here in a week or so.

Interestingly the exact same thing occurred in a mates rb30det but using the GT35r .82; on the same dyno his made 270rwkw at 17psi much more and it began see sawing. Only real difference between the motors is mine runs a slightly higher comp and my head has had a bit of work (port polish valve deshroud).

The R33 head has slightly larger inlet ports and are more square open looking compared to the R32's twin round tube looking ports. Exhaust the same, valve size the same.

Redliner007 sorry to say mate; reliable, power and cheap do not get used in the same sentence. My build has thus far cost me about $12,000; this was with the rb25 head already ported, cam'ed upgraded and reco'ed (ie: Head not touched during this build). My target was 300rwkw, which is plenty for a rwd car. So if you want to make a reliable 350rwkw, make sure you have deep pockets, as you'll wont get much change from $20,000, to go from what you have now to what you want. This is provided that someone else is doing the work for you, if dong yourself you will save maybe a quarter of that.

PS: I would personally use a GT35R (0.86a/r), if i was aiming for over 320rwkw.

The R32 head is fine for 300rwkw. R33 if your going to push 400rwkw.

The GT3076 .8 rear .6 port shroud comp can be squeezed to 320rwkw with pair of cams. Mine has made 268rwkw on 15psi and 285rwkw on 17psi. Didn't appear to make a great deal after that as we suspect one of the following resulting in a tooth up/down see saw top end:

* The 232 duration exhaust cam was causing a little problem letting the exh gas out

* Some funky ignition break down began setting in (as there was a fair bit of unburnt fuel around when there shouldn't have been)

* Onset of valve float

Waiting for a set of 264 advertised 221degree @ 0.050" 9mm lift cams should be here in a week or so.

Interestingly the exact same thing occurred in a mates rb30det but using the GT35r .82; on the same dyno his made 270rwkw at 17psi much more and it began see sawing. Only real difference between the motors is mine runs a slightly higher comp and my head has had a bit of work (port polish valve deshroud).

The R33 head has slightly larger inlet ports and are more square open looking compared to the R32's twin round tube looking ports. Exhaust the same, valve size the same.

R32 RB25DE is capable of more than 300rwkw, my motor in it's previous car was making 365rwkw through standard 25DE head/manifold/throttlebody (with a pair of 2540's @ 21psi).

R32 RB25DE is capable of more than 300rwkw, my motor in it's previous car was making 365rwkw through standard 25DE head/manifold/throttlebody (with a pair of 2540's @ 21psi).

Ahh yes it is most definitely.. BUT over 300rwkw the rb25 head tends to make it just that little bit easier.

My own head has a little work done to it (port polish, valve deshroud); comparing to the rb25det head on the same dyno with same turbo mods etc it appears to be making power slightly easier when under 300rwkw. Will be good to see how it goes when pushing over 300.

What cams were you running with that combo? I'm in the process of bolting in a pair of 264 9mm's (see my cam cap scoring possible issue in the forced induction section) :P

Ahh yes it is most definitely.. BUT over 300rwkw the rb25 head tends to make it just that little bit easier.

My own head has a little work done to it (port polish, valve deshroud); comparing to the rb25det head on the same dyno with same turbo mods etc it appears to be making power slightly easier when under 300rwkw. Will be good to see how it goes when pushing over 300.

What cams were you running with that combo? I'm in the process of bolting in a pair of 264 9mm's (see my cam cap scoring possible issue in the forced induction section) :P

252's I think, nothing too serious, valves/springs/etc are all standard but he wouldn't sell me cams with the head so I'm stuck with stock 25DE cams for now :blush:

Was looking into cam upgrade but to go whole hog it's like a 2.5k excercise :P

I'm contemplating seeing if I can get some standard 26 cams reground to suit hydraulic lifters..

i was gonna start another topic but i've started too many already so ill just add a post in here...

have any of you guys had the chance to go through a vehicle inspection with the rb30 bottom ends and what did they say about it being legal or not? do u think i should just grind the 30 number off the motor and restamp rb26 to keep it "legal"?

this issue is the single biggest turn off of doing the conversion. Also the fact if i want over 400hp i really need rods and pistons, were as a rb26 only need a set of forgies and stock rods are good to go to 500hp.

i was gonna start another topic but i've started too many already so ill just add a post in here...

have any of you guys had the chance to go through a vehicle inspection with the rb30 bottom ends and what did they say about it being legal or not? do u think i should just grind the 30 number off the motor and restamp rb26 to keep it "legal"?

this issue is the single biggest turn off of doing the conversion. Also the fact if i want over 400hp i really need rods and pistons, were as a rb26 only need a set of forgies and stock rods are good to go to 500hp.

why not just submit the new engine number to transport?

why not just submit the new engine number to transport?

Hey Shane, its not as easy as that. The rb30 is older (finished production late 80s from memory) than the car (1996) its in so therefore the conversion is illegal in WA (dunno about other states though)

the only way of stating its an rb30 is possibly doing an emmision test which is something not even available to the general public in WA.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...