Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

SK , I like the idea of the RB26 head . Better cam profiles , larger valves (by how much I don't know) better and lower inlet manifold , common injector style . Was the RB26 head difficult to come by , obviously it was not cheap . I assume it can use the single turbo exhaust manifold plus coils and ignitor .

Thanks SK , A .

They'd be of interest if you own a 240Z/260Z, 280zx, 1600, Z31, DR30, or import R31.

Basically the newer R200 found in later skylines is too short for our cars.

Back on topic though, so with the 3.0L is worth dropping to say around a ~3.5 LSD you think without harming accceleration?

Would probably sit on nice low revs on the freeway I suppose.

They'd be of interest if you own a 240Z/260Z, 280zx, 1600, Z31, DR30, or import R31.

Basically the newer R200 found in later skylines is too short for our cars.

Back on topic though, so with the 3.0L is worth dropping to say around a ~3.5 LSD you think without harming accceleration?

Would probably sit on nice low revs on the freeway I suppose.

looks at my signature:

HR31 GT Passage Skyline

i think i've got 4.4's as my car was once auto and i was wondering how they would affect the 3L and its power out put. I think the 4.11 and 4.4's are in place to make the non torquey RB20 feel punchy and quick, but what will happen once the 3L with mountains of torque goes in? will the tires light up too easily?

:D

it sits nice and low in the rev range with the std r32 4.3 lsd....dont worry about extras unless its a) got to be sorted in a custom job (like drukenmaster), b)your old diff is rooted.

I always see people asking about big arsed turbos, injectors etc....how about people worry about building the motor, fitting it and getting it running......

 

I always see people asking about big arsed turbos, injectors etc....how about people worry about building the motor, fitting it and getting it running......

I will be fitting my solid fuel lines down the length of the car tonight, followed by the adjustable suspension during the week. Now it is easier to fit the diff and the rear suspension at the same time as they share mounting points, and I need to fit my new suspension in order to fit my modified front crossmember. Now the front crossmember will need to be in so I can fit my modified engine mounts to it, and those mounts will have to be there to sit my RB30DET on.

So sorting out a diff for me to pick up now is crucial to getting my RB30 fitted and running :wassup:

:jk:

Drunkenmaster , later I will look into a 3.7 or 3.5 ratio long nose R200 . Going from 2 litres to 3 should pull this easily . From memory VL's used a 3.45 std with a 3.3 1st gear (NA) .

Be careful, VL's came with 185/60/15's, compare that to my GTST with 245/45/17's, this turrns the 4.363 dif ratio into a 3.9. :)

Drunkenmaster , later I will look into a 3.7 or 3.5 ratio long nose R200 . Going from 2 litres to 3 should pull this easily . From memory VL's used a 3.45 std with a 3.3 1st gear (NA) .

Be careful, VL's came with 185/60/15's, compare that to my GTST with 245/45/17's, this turrns the 4.363 dif ratio into a 3.9. :)

Can someone tell me what valve sizes in RB26 and if ports/stud patern on exhaust side same as RB20/25DET .

No, this is like Groundhog Day. Nissan don't want you swapping GTR bits onto cheaper cars, so they designed it so it was different. :)

Hi,

I'm new to the forum and must say that this thread is oustanding, credit goes to everyone who has contributed.

I recently picked up a r33 GTST with a blown bottom end and after reading this thread i know what bottom end i'll be using.

I have purchased a GT3040 (0.82 exh ) to go with the new engine.

I have a question.

What parts will fit into the RB25DET head from a GTR head?, I have read in another thread that it's possible to use GTR cams in an RB20.

I got my block last week and after removing the head gasket noticed that there was a '2' stamped on each of the pistons and next to each cylinder on the deck. Is this an indication that the cylinders have been bored? The hone in the cylinders is pretty good considering the engine has 200,000k on it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...